Data- and literature-based reflections on western european evaluation standards and practices

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 2004, Issue 104, 2004, Pages 43-54

  Beywl, Wolfgang ^a   Speer, Sandra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248047026     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.135     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Beywl, W., and Speer, S., “Qualitätskriterien für Evaluationen in der Berufsbildung.“Berufsbildung in Wissenschaft und Praxis, 2003, no. 6, 13-17.
2. Beywl, W., and Speer, S., “Developing Standards to Evaluate Vocational Education and Training Programs.“In P.Descy and M.Tessaring (eds.), The Foundations of Evaluation and Impact Research: Third Report on Vocational Training Research in Europe-Background Report.Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2004.
3. Beywl, W., Speer, S., and Kehr, J., Wirkungsorientierte Evaluation im Rahmen der Armutsund Reichtumsberichterstattung.Bonn: Bundesministerium für Gesundheit und Soziale Sicherung, 2004.
4. Beywl, W., and Widmer, T., “Die Standards im Vergleich mit weiteren Regelwerken zur Qualität fachlicher Leistungserstellung.“In J. R.Sanders (ed.), Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation.Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 2000.
5. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Evaluation (ed.).Standards für Evaluation.Cologne: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Evaluation, 2002.
6. European Commission.The MEANS Collection, European Communities.Luxembourg: European Commission, 1999.
7. European Commission.“Focus on Results: Strengthening Evaluation of Commission Activities, Brussels”2000.[http://europa.eu.int/comm/budget/evaluation/pdf/sec20001051_en.pdf].
8. European Commission.“Evaluation Standards and Good Practice: Brussels”2002[http://europa.eu.int/comm/budget/evaluation/pdf/C_2002_5267_final_en.pdf].
9. European Commission.“Evaluation of Socio-Economic Development-The Guide.”2003.[www.evalsed.info/frame_guide_intro.asp].
10. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation.The Program Evaluation Standards.(2nd ed.)Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1994.
11. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation.Handbuch der Evaluationsstandards.Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 2000.
12. Müller-Kohlenberg, H., and Beywl, W., “Standards der Selbstevaluation.“Zeitschrift für Evaluation, 2003, no. 3, 79-93.
13. Pawson, J. M., and Tilley, N., Realistic Evaluation.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1997.
14. Rossi, P. H., Freeman, H. E., and Lipsey, M. W., Evaluation: A Systematic Approach.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1999.
15. Stufflebeam, D. L. (ed.).Evaluation Models.New Directions for Evaluation, no. 89.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
16. Uusikylä, P., and Virtanen, P., “Meta-Evaluation as a Tool for Learning: A Case Study of the European Structural Fund Evaluations in Finland.“Evaluation, 2000, 6(1), 50-65.
17. Vedung, E., Evaluation im öffentlichen Sektor.Vienna: Boehlau, 1998.
18. Williams, K., de Laat, B., and Stern, E., The Use of Evaluation in the Commission Services: Final Report.Paris: Technopolis France, 2002.