Personalization in the public sector. An inventory of organizational and user obstacles towards personalization of electronic services in the public sector

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 148-164

  Pieterson, Willem ^a   Ebbers, Wolfgang ^a   van Dijk, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845190363     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2005.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adams D.A., Nelson R.P., and Todd P.A. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly 16 2 (1992) 227-247
2. Alpert S.R., Karat J., Karat C.-M., Brodie C., and Vergo J.G. User attitudes regaring a user-adaptive ecommerce Web site. User Modelling and User-Adapted interaction 13 4 (2003) 373-396
3. Beniger J.R. The Control revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society (1986), Harvester, Cambridge, MA
4. Berg M. Kaf en Koren van Kennismanagement: Over Informatietechnologie, de Kwaliteit van Zorg in Het Werk van Professionals (2001), Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam
5. Bewley W.L., Roberts T.L., Schroit D., and Verplank W.L. Human Factors Testing in the Design of Xerox's 8010 "Star" Office Workstation. Paper presented at the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, Massachusetts, United States (1983)
6. Bonett M. Personalization of Web services: Opportunites and challanges. Ariadne Magazine 28 (2004)
7. Briggs P., Simpson B., and De Angeli A. Personalisation and trust: A reciprocal relationship?. In: Karat C.-M., Blom J.O., and Karat J. (Eds). Designing Personalized user experiences in eCommerce (2004), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
8. Byford K.S. Privacy in cyberspace: Constructing a model of privacy for the electronic communications environment. Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal 24 (1998) 1-74
9. Culnan M.J., and Milne G.R. The Culnan-Milne survey on consumers and online privacy notices: Summary of responses. Interagency Public Workshop: Get Noticed, Effective Financial Privacy Notices. Washington DC (2001)
10. Cranor L.F. I Didn't buy it for myself: Privacy and ecommerce personalization. In: Karat C.-M., Blom J.O., and Karat J. (Eds). Designing Personalized User Experiences in eCommerce (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
11. CyberDialogue. Online Consumer Personalization Survey (2001), The personalization consortium, Wakefield
12. Dahlberg T., Maalt N., and Öörni A. Trust Enhanced Technology Acceptance Model-Consumer Acceptance of Mobile Payment Solutions (2004), Helsinki school of economics, Helsinki
13. Davis, F. D. (1986). A Technology Acceptance Model for empirically testing new end user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral Thesis). Massachusetts: Sloan School of Management.
14. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 8 (1989) 982-1003
15. Dickson G.W., DeSanctis G., and McBride D.J. Understanding the effectiveness of computer graphics for decision support: A cumulative experimental approach. Communications of the ACM 29 (1986) 40-47
16. Direct Marketing. Anonymous Web browsing threatens profiling practices of E-marketers. Direct Marketing 64 (2001) (November 2001)
17. Ebbers, W. E. (2002). Facing the Digital World: Connecting a permanently changing Internet to rigid organizational structures (Doctoral Thesis). Enschede: Universiteit Twente.
18. Ebbers W.E. Ambities en prestaties van een digitale Belastingdienst: Verwezenlijking oorspronkelijk 'elektronisch' ambitieniveau van de Belastingdienst nader bekeken. Bestuurskunde 13 8 (2004) 358-365
19. Gefen D., Karahanna E., and Straub D.W. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly 27 1 (2003) 51-90
20. General Accounting Office. Electronic Government-Federal Initiatives Are Evolving Rapidly But They Face Significant Challenges (2000), United States General Accounting Office
21. Fox S., Raine L., Horrigan J., Lenhart J., Spooner T., and Carter C. Trust and Privacy Online: Why Americans Want to Rewrite the Rules (2000), The Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington DC
22. Hinnant C.C., and O'Looney J.A. Examining pre-adoption interest in online innovations: An exploratory study of e-service personalization in the public sector. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50 4 (2003) 436
23. Hoegler T., and Schuster T. Quo Vadis e-Government?-A Trap Between Unsuitable Technologies and Deployment Strategies. Paper presented at EGOV 2002 (2002)
24. Hoffman D.L., Novak T.P., and Peralta M. Building consumer trust online. Communications of the ACM 42 4 (1999) 80-85
25. Hoogwout M. Super pilots, subsidizing or self-organization: Stimulating e-government initiatives in dutch local governments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2739 (2003) 85-90
26. Horton R.P., Buck T., Waterson P.E., and Clegg C.W. Explaining intranet use with the Technology Acceptance Model. Journal of Information Technology 16 (2001) 137-249
27. Igbaria M., Zinatelli N., Cragg P., and Cavaye A.L.M. Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly 21 3 (1997) 279-305
28. Ke W., and Wei K.K. Successful E-Government in Singapore. Communications of the ACM 47 6 (2004) 95-99
29. Legris P., Ingham J., and Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the Technology Acceptance Model. Information and Management 40 3 (2003) 191-204
30. Ling T. Delivering joined-up government in the UK: Dimensions, issues and problems. Public Administration 80 4 (2002) 615-648
31. O'Hara C., and Staff F.C.W. The Big Payoff. Federal Computer Week, November 06. (2000)
32. Manber U., Patel A., and Robinson J. Experience with personalization on Yahoo!. Communications of the ACM 43 8 (2000) 35-39
33. Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the theory of planned behaviour. Information systems research 2 3 (1991) 173-191
34. Ministerie van Binnenlandse zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties. Voortgangsrapportage Elektronische Overheid (2005), Ministerie van Binnenlandse zaken, Den Haag
35. Pappa D., and Makropoulos C. Designing a Brokerage Platform for the Delivery of E-Government Services to the Public. In: Wimmer M.A. (Ed). KMGove 2004, LNAI 3035 (2004) 178-189
36. Pijpers G.M., Bemelmans T.M.A., Heemstra F.J., and Montfort K.A.G.M.v. Senior executives' use of information technology. Information and Software Technology 43 (2001) 959-971
37. PriceWaterhouseCoopers. Die Zukunft heiβt E-Government: Deutschlands Städte auf dem Weg zur virtuellen Verwaltung (2000), PriceWaterhouseCoopers
38. Relyea H.C. E-Gov: Introduction and Overview. Government Information. Quarterly 19 1 (2002) 9-35
39. Rennhard M., Rafaeli S., Mathy L., Plattner B., and Hutchinson D. Towards pseudonymous e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research 4 (2004) 83-111
40. Rogers E.M. Difussion of Innovations. 5 ed (2003), The Free Press, New York
41. Roy Morgan Research (2001). Privacy and the community. Available:http://www.privacy.gov.au/publications/rcommunity.rtf[2004, December, 10th].
42. Sonntag M., and Wimmer M. Legal Aspects of One-Stop Government: The Case of Applying for a Building Permission. Paper presented at EGOV 2003, 2nd International Conference on e-Government, Heidelberg, Germany. (2003)
43. Szjana B. Empirical evaluation of the revised Technology Acceptance Model. Management Science 41 1 (1996) 85-92
44. Tapscott D., and Caston A. Paradigm Shift: The New Promise of Information Technology (1993), McGraw-Hill, New York
45. In: van der Geest T.M., van Dijk J.A.G.M., and Pieterson W.J. (Eds). Alter Ego: State of the Art on User Profiling. An Overview of the Most Relevant Organisational and Behavioural Aspects Regarding User Profiling (2005), Telematica Instituut, Enschede
46. van Dijk J.A.G.M. The Deepening Divide, Inequility in the Information Society (2005), Thousand Oaks, London
47. van Venrooy A. Nieuwe Vormenvan Interorganisationele Publieke Dienstverlening (2002), Eburon, Delft
48. Venkatesh V., and Davis F.D. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences 27 3 (1996) 451-481
49. Vereniging van Nederlandse Gemeenten. Intergemeentelijke Samenwerking en ICT: De Grenzen Verkennnen (2003), Den Haag: VNG
50. Wang H., Lee M.K.O., and Wang C. Consumer privacy concerns about Internet marketing. Communications of the ACM 41 3 (1998) 63-70
51. Warkentin M., Gefen D., Pavlou P.A., and Rose G.M. Encouraging citizen adoption of e-Government by building trust. Electronic Markets 12 3 (2002) 157-162
52. Weber M. Gezag en Bureaucratie: Geredigeerd en Ingeleid Door Prof. Dr. A. van Braam (1970), Universitaire Pers Rotterdam, Rotterdam
53. West D.M. Global E-Government, Center for Public Policy (2004), Brown University, Rhode Island