On the vulnerability assessment of monumental buildings

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 445-463

  Lagomarsino, Sergio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Damage scenario; Fragility curves; Monumental buildings; Seismic risk analysis; Vulnerability assessment

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKES; MASONRY CONSTRUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RELIABILITY THEORY; SEISMIC PROSPECTING;

FRAGILITY CURVES; MACROSEISMIC INTENSITY; MONUMENTAL BUILDINGS; SEISMIC RISK ANALYSIS; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

MASONRY; MONUMENT; SEISMIC HAZARD; VULNERABILITY;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

EID: 33751549957     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-006-9025-y     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. ATC-21 (1988) Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazard, Applied Technology Council, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Report 154, Washington, DC
2. Benedetti D, Petrini V (1984) On seismic vulnerability of masonry buildings: proposal of an evaluation procedure L'Industria delle Costruzioni, 18. pp 66-78 (in Italian)
3. Braga F, Dolce M, Liberatore D (1982) A statistical study on damaged buildings and an ensuing review of the M.S.K76 scale. In: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Athens
4. Calderini C, Lagomarsino S (2004) The effect of the masonry pattern on the global behaviour of vaults. In: Modena C, Lourenço PB, Roca P (eds) Structural analysis of historical constructions. Proceedings of IV Int. Seminar SAHC, vol 1. Padova, Italy, A.A. Balkema, London, UK, ISBN 04 1536 379 9, pp 619-628
5. Doherty KT, Griffith MC, Lam N, Wilson J (2002) Displacement-based seismic analysis for out-of-plane bending of unreinforced masonry walls, Earthquake Eng Structural Dynamics 31:833-850
6. Fajfar P (2000) A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design, Earthquake Spectra 16(3):573-592
7. Freeman SA (1998) Development and use of capacity spectrum method. In: Proceedings of the 6th US National Conf. Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, EERI, Oakland, California
8. Giuffrè A, Carocci C (1996) Vulnerability and mitigation in historical centres in seismic areas. In: Proceedings 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco 1996
9. Grunthal G (1998) European Macroseismic Scale 1998. Chaiers du Centre Europèèn de Géodynamique et de Sismologie, 15, Luxembourg
10. Heyman J (1966) The stone skeleton, Int J Solids Structures, 2:249-279
11. Heyman J (1982) The masonry arch, Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, UK
12. Irizarry J, Goula X, Susagna T, Roca A, Maňa F (2004) Earthquake risk scenarios for monuments in Barcelona, Spain. In: Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, paper 2162 (CD-Rom)
13. Lagomarsino S (1998) A new methodology for the post-earthquake investigation of ancient churches. In: Proceedings of the XI European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paris, A.A. Balkema (CD-ROM), ISBN 90-5410-982-3. p 67 (12 pages)
14. Lagomarsino S (2005) Vulnerability assessment of historical buildings. In: Xavier Goula, Carlos Sousa Oliveira, Antoni Roca (eds) Assessing and managing earthquake risk, ISBN 1-4020-3524-1
15. Lagomarsino S, Giovinazzi S (2006) Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability assessment of current buildings, Bull Earthquake Eng. DOI 10.1007/s10518-006-9024-z (this issue).
16. Lagomarsino S, Podestà S (2004a) Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches. Part 1 : damage assessment and emergency planning, Earthquake Spectra, 20(2):377-394
17. Lagomarsino S, Podestà S (2004b) Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches. Part 2: statistical analysis of surveyed data and methods for risk analysis, Earthquake Spectra, 20(2):395-412
18. Lagomarsino S, Podestà S, Cifani G, Lemme A (2004a) The 31st October 2002 earthquake in Molise (Italy): a new methodology for the damage and seismic vulnerability survey of churches. In: Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, paper 1366 (CD-Rom)
19. Lagomarsino S, Podestà S, Resemini S, Curti E, Parodi S (2004b) Mechanical models for the seismic vulnerability assessment of churches. In: Modena C, Lourenço PB, Roca P (eds) Structural analysis of historical constructions, Proceedings of IV Int. Seminar SAHC, vol. 2. Padova, Italy, A.A. Balkema, London, UK, ISBN 04 1536 379 9, pp 1091-1101
20. NIBS (1999) HAZUS Earthquake loss estimation methodology: user's manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), National Institute of Building Sciences, vol 1. Washington, DC, 2,3
21. Restrepo-Vélez LF, Magenes G (2004) Experimental testing in support of a mechanics-based procedure for the seismic risk evaluation of unreinforced masonry buildings. In: Modena C, Lourenço PB, Roca P (eds) Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, Proceedings of IV Int. Seminar SAHC, vol 2. Padova, Italy, A.A. Balkema, London, UK, ISBN 041536 379 9, pp 1079-1089