Modeling endogenous learning and imperfect competition effects in climate change economics

Climatic Change

Volumn 79, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 121-141

  Viguier, Laurent ^a,b   Barreto, Leonardo ^c   Haurie, Alain ^d   Kypreos, Socrates ^c   Rafaj, Peter ^e  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^e INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

Author keywords

Climate policy; Dynamic games; Economic models; Emissions trading; Endogenous technological learning; Strategic behavior

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; GAME THEORY; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

CLIMATE POLICY; DYNAMIC GAMES; ECONOMIC MODELS; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENDOGENOUS TECHNOLOGICAL LEARNING; STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; EMISSION; LEARNING; POLICY STRATEGY; SIMULATION;

EID: 33751538027     PISSN: 01650009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-006-9070-1     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aumann RJ (1974) Subjectivity and correlation in randomized strategies. Journal of Mathematical Economics 1:67-96
2. Babiker M, Criqui P, Ellerman D, Reilly J, Viguier L (2003) Assessing the impact of carbon tax differentiation in the European Union. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 8(3):187-197
3. Babiker M, Reilly J, Viguier L (2004) Is international emission trading always beneficial? The Energy Journal 25(2):33-56
4. Başar T, Olsder G (1989) Dynamic noncooperative game theory. Academic Press, London
5. Bahn O, Kypreos S (2002) MERGE-ETL: An optimisation equilibrium model with two different endogenous technological learning formulations. PSI Report 02-16, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen
6. Barreto L (2001) Technological learning in energy optimisation models and the deployment of emerging technologies. Thesis no. 14151, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ)
7. Barreto L, Kypreos S (2004a) Emissions trading and technology deployment in an energy-systems "Bottom-Up" model with technology learning. European Journal of Operational Research 158:243-261
8. Barreto L, Kypreos S (2004b) Extensions to the Energy-System GMM Model for SAPIENTIA. Report to the EC-sponsored SAPIENTIA Project ENK6-CT-2002-00614, Paul Scherrer Institute, Energy Economics Group, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
9. Barrett S (1997) The strategy of trade sanctions in international environmental agreements. Resource and Energy Economics 19:345-561
10. Barrett S (1999) A theory of full international cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Politics 11(4):519-41
11. Bernard A, Haurie A, Vielle M, Viguier L (2005) A two-level dynamic game of carbon emissions trading between Russia, China, and Annex B Countries. Journal of Economic Dynamic & Control. Preliminary Accepted for Publication
12. Bernard A, Paltsev S, Reilly J, Vielle M, Viguier L (2003) Russia's role in the Kyoto Protocol. Report 98, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge MA
13. Bernard A, Vielle M (1998) La structure du modèle GEMINI-E3. Economie & Prévision 5(136)
14. Bernard A, Vielle M (2003) Measuring the welfare cost of climate change policies: A comparative assessment based on the computable general equilibrium model GEMINI-E3. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 8(3):199-217
15. Buchner B, Carraro C, Cersosimo I, Marchiori C (2005) Back to Kyoto? US participation and the linkage between R&D and climate cooperation. In: Haurie A, Viguier L (eds) Cloupling climate and economic dynamics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Chapt. 5
16. Carraro C, Siniscalco D (1996) R&D cooperation and the stability of international environmental agreements, In: Carraro C (ed) International environmental negotiations. Kluwer Academic Publishers
17. Ciscar J, Soria A (2004) Kyoto and beyond Kyoto climate policy: comparison of open-loop and feedback game outcomes. In: Carraro C, Fragnelli V (eds) Game practice and the environment. Cheltenham, UK -Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar
18. Criqui P (1996) POLES 2.2, Technical Report, JOULE II Programme, European Commission DG XVII - Science Research Development, Bruxelles, Belgium
19. 2 reduction under flexibility mechanisms and technical progress. International Journal of Global Energy Issues 14:155-168
20. Dockner E, Jorgensen S, Long N, Sorger G (2000) Differential games in economics and management sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
21. EC (2002) Communication from the commission on impact assessment. Technical Report COM(2002) 276 Final, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium
22. Fishbone L, Abilock H (1981) MARKAL, a linear programming model for energy systems analysis: technical description of the BNL version. International Journal of Energy Research 5:353-375
23. Forgo F, Fulop J, Prill M (2005) Game theoretic models for climate change negotiations. European Journal of Operational Research 160:252-267
24. Germain M, Toint P, Tulkens H, de Zeew A (1998) Transfers to sustain core-theoretic cooperation in international stock pollutant control. Discussion Paper 9832, CORE
25. 2 abatement in the presence of induced technological change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39:1-38
26. Hahn R (1984) Market power and transferable property rights. Quarterly Journal of Economics 99(4):753-765
27. Haurie A, Moresino F, Vielle M, Viguier L (2005a) A coupled equilibrium model of international climate policy. Mimeo
28. Haurie A, Moresino F, Viguier L (2005b) A two-level differential game of international emissions trading. Annals of the International Society of Dynamic Games. To appear
29. Haurie A, Viguier L (2003) A stochastic dynamic game of carbon emissions trading. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 8:239-248
30. IEA (2002) Beyond Kyoto. Energy dynamics and climate stabilisation. Paris, France: International Energy Agency
31. Kemfert C (2005) Climate policy cooperation games between developed and developing nations: a quantitative, applied analysis. In: Haurie A, Viguier L (eds) Cloupling climate and economic dynamics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Chapt. 5
32. Kouvaritakis N, Soria A, Isoard S (2000) Modelling energy technology dynamics: methodology for adaptive expectations models with learning by doing and learning by searching. Int. J. of Global Energy Issues 14(1/2/3/4):104-115
33. Kypreos S (2000) The MERGE model with endogenous technological change. In: Proceedings of the economic modeling of environmental policy and endogenous technological change workshop. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 16-17
34. Kypreos S (2005) Modeling experience curves in MERGE. Energy 30(14):2721-2737
35. Kypreos S, Bahn O (2002) A MERGE model with endogenous technological change. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 8:249-259
36. Loulou R, Lavigne D (1996) MARKAL model with elastic demands: application to GHG emission control, In: Carraro C, Haurie A (eds) Operations research and environmental management. Vol. 5 of The FEEM/KLUWER International series on economics, energy and environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 201-220
37. Manne A, Barreto L (2004) Learn-by-doing and carbon dioxide abatement. Energy Economics 26:621-633
38. Manne A, Richels R (2001) An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gases. Nature 401:675-677
39. 2 abatement. In: International Energy Workshop. Stanford, USA, pp. 18-20
40. Messner S (1997) Endogenised technological learning in an energy systems model. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 7:291-313
41. Philibert C, Pershing J (2001) Considering the options: Climate targets for all countries. Climate Policy 1:211-227
42. Rafaj P, Kypreos S, Barreto L (2005) Flexible carbon mitigation policies: analysis with a global multi-regional MARKAL model. In: Haurie A Viguier L (eds) Cloupling climate and economic dynamics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Chapt. 5
43. Rosen JB (1965) Existence and uniqueness of equilibrium points for concave N-person games. Econometrica 33(3):520-534
44. Stavins R (1995) Transaction costs and tradable permits. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29:133-48
45. Viguier L, Vielle M, Haurie A, Bernard A (2006) A two-level computable equilibrium model to assess the strategic allocation of emission allowances within the european union. Computers & Operations Research 33(2):369-385