Regional copy number-independent deregulation of transcription in cancer

Nature Genetics

Volumn 38, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1386-1396

  Stransky, Nicolas ^a   Vallot, Céline ^a   Reyal, Fabien ^a   Bernard Pierrot, Isabelle ^a   De Medina, Sixtina Gil Diez ^a,b   Segraves, Rick ^c   De Rycke, Yann ^d   Elvin, Paul ^e   Cassidy, Andrew ^e   Spraggon, Carolyn ^e   Graham, Alexander ^e   Southgate, Jennifer ^f   Asselain, Bernard ^d   Allory, Yves ^b   Abbou, Claude C ^b   Albertson, Donna G ^c,g   Thiery, Jean Paul ^a,d,h   Chopin, Dominique K ^b   Pinkel, Daniel ^c   Radvanyi, François ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^e ASTRAZENECA   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR AND CELL BIOLOGY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTONE; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ARTICLE; BLADDER CARCINOMA; CANCER GENETICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DNA METHYLATION; DNA MICROARRAY; EPIGENETICS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE MAPPING; GENE NUMBER; GENE REPRESSION; GENE SILENCING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENOME ANALYSIS; GENOMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN METHYLATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

CELL LINE, TUMOR; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 3; DNA METHYLATION; DNA, NEOPLASM; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; GENE DOSAGE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, NEOPLASTIC; HUMANS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

EID: 33751530055     PISSN: 10614036     EISSN: 15461718     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ng1923     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Solinas-Toldo, S. et al. Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: biochips to screen for genomic imbalances. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 20, 399-407 (1997).
2. Pinkel, D. et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat. Genet. 20, 207-211 (1998).
3. Hughes, T.R. et al. Widespread aneuploidy revealed by DNA microarray expression profiling. Nat. Genet. 25, 333-337 (2000).
4. Hyman, E. et al. Impact of DNA amplification on gene expression patterns in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 62, 6240-6245 (2002).
5. Pollack, J.R. et al. Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12963-12968 (2002).
6. Masayesva, B.G. et al. Gene expression alterations over large chromosomal regions in cancers include multiple genes unrelated to malignant progression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 8715-8720 (2004).
7. Heidenblad, M. et al. Microarray analyses reveal strong influence of DNA copy number alterations on the transcriptional patterns in pancreatic cancer: implications for the interpretation of genomic amplifications. Oncogene 24, 1794-1801 (2005).
8. Crawley, J.J. & Furge, K.A. Identification of frequent cytogenetic aberrations in hepatocellular carcinoma using gene-expression microarray data. Genome Biol. 3, RESEARCH0075 (2002).
9. Zhou, Y. et al. Genome-wide identification of chromosomal regions of increased tumor expression by transcriptome analysis. Cancer Res. 63, 5781-5784 (2003).
10. Kano, M. et al. Expression imbalance map: a new visualization method for detection of mRNA expression imbalance regions. Physiol. Genomics 13, 31-46 (2003).
11. Midorikawa, Y. et al. Distinct chromosomal bias of gene expression signatures in the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 64, 7263-7270 (2004).
12. Furge, K.A., Dykema, K.J., Ho, C. & Chen, X. Comparison of array-based comparative genomic hybridization with gene expression-based regional expression biases to identify genetic abnormalities in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Genomics 6, 67 (2005).
13. Yang, X.J. et al. A molecular classification of papillary renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 65, 5628-5637 (2005).
14. Fujii, T. et al. A preliminary transcriptome map of non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 62, 3340-3346 (2002).
15. Cohen, B.A., Mitra, R.D., Hughes, J.D. & Church, G.M. A computational analysis of whole-genome expression data reveals chromosomal domains of gene expression. Nat. Genet. 26, 183-186 (2000).
16. Spellman, P.T. & Rubin, G.M. Evidence for large domains of similarly expressed genes in the Drosophila genome. J. Biol. 1, 5 (2002).
17. Reyal, F. et al. Visualizing chromosomes as transcriptome correlation maps: evidence of chromosomal domains containing co-expressed genes-a study of 130 invasive ductal breast carcinomas. Cancer Res. 65, 1376-1383 (2005).
18. Yi, Y., Mirosevich, J., Shyr, Y., Matusik, R. & George, A.L., Jr. Coupled analysis of gene expression and chromosomal location. Genomics 85, 401-412 (2005).
19. Frigola, J. et al. Epigenetic remodeling in colorectal cancer results in coordinate gene suppression across an entire chromosome band. Nat. Genet. 38, 540-549 (2006).
20. Turner, B.M. Cellular memory and the histone code. Cell 111, 285-291 (2002).
21. Nguyen, C.T. et al. Histone H3-lysine 9 methylation is associated with aberrant gene silencing in cancer cells and is rapidly reversed by 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Cancer Res. 62, 6456-6461 (2002).
22. Daigo, Y. et al. Molecular cloning of a candidate tumor suppressor gene, DLC1, from chromosome 3p21.3. Cancer Res. 59, 1966-1972 (1999).
23. Nakamura, Y. et al. Phospholipase Cdelta1 is required for skin stem cell lineage commitment. EMBO J. 22, 2981-2991 (2003).
24. Chambeyron, S. & Bickmore, W.A. Chromatin decondensation and nuclear reorganization of the HoxB locus upon induction of transcription. Genes Dev. 18, 1119-1130 (2004).
25. Huebert, D.J. & Bernstein, B.E. Genomic views of chromatin. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 15, 476-481 (2005).
26. Gialitakis, M. et al. Coordinated changes of histone modifications and HDAC mobilization regulate the induction of MHC class II genes by trichostatin A. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 765-772 (2006).
27. Bird, A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 16, 6-21 (2002).
28. van Driel, R., Fransz, P.F. & Verschure, P.J. The eukaryotic genome: a system regulated at different hierarchical levels. J. Cell Sci. 116, 4067-4075 (2003).
29. Zardo, G. et al. Integrated genomic and epigenomic analyses pinpoint biallelic gene inactivation in tumors. Nat. Genet. 32, 453-458 (2002).
30. Hurst, L.D., Pal, C. & Lercher, M.J. The evolutionary dynamics of eukaryotic gene order. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 299-310 (2004).
31. Sproul, D., Gilbert, N. & Bickmore, W.A. The role of chromatin structure in regulating the expression of clustered genes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 775-781 (2005).
32. Chang, H.Y. et al. Gene expression signature of fibroblast serum response predicts human cancer progression: similarities between tumors and wounds. PLoS Biol. 2, E7 (2004).
33. Diez de Medina, S.G. et al. Decreased expression of keratinocyte growth factor receptor in a subset of human transitional cell bladder carcinomas. Oncogene 14, 323-330 (1997).
34. Chirgwin, J.M., Przybyla, A.E., MacDonald, R.J. & Rutter, W.J. Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease. Biochemistry 18, 5294-5299 (1979).
35. Coombs, L.M. et al. Simultaneous isolation of DNA, RNA, and antigenic protein exhibiting kinase activity from small tumor samples using guanidine isothiocyanate. Anal. Biochem. 188, 338-343 (1990).
36. Labarca, C. & Paigen, K. A simple, rapid, and sensitive DNA assay procedure. Anal. Biochem. 102, 344-352 (1980).
37. Snijders, A.M. et al. Genome-wide-array-based comparative genomic hybridization reveals genetic homogeneity and frequent copy number increases encompassing CCNE1 in fallopian tube carcinoma. Oncogene 22, 4281-4286 (2003).
38. Jain, A.N. et al. Fully automatic quantification of microarray image data. Genome Res. 12, 325-332 (2002).
39. Neuvial, P. et al. Spatial normalization of array-CGH data. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 264 (2006).
40. Hupé, P., Stransky, N., Thiery, J.P., Radvanyi, F. & Barillot, E. Analysis of array CGH data: from signal ratio to gain and loss of DNA regions. Bioinformatics 20, 3413-3422 (2004).
41. Southgate, J., Hutton, K.A., Thomas, D.F. & Trejdosiewicz, L.K. Normal human urothelial cells in vitro: proliferation and induction of stratification. Lab. Invest. 71, 583-594 (1994).
42. Xiong, Z. & Laird, P.W. COBRA: a sensitive and quantitative DNA methylation assay. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 2532-2534 (1997).
43. O'Neill, L.P. & Turner, B.M. Immunoprecipitation of native chromatin: NChIP. Methods 31, 76-82 (2003).
44. Kent, W.J. BLAT-the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. 12, 656-664 (2002).
45. R development core team R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2006).