Evaluation of semi-automatic arterial stenosis quantification

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 167-175

  Hoyos, Marcela Hernández ^a,c   Serfaty, Jean Michel ^a,b   Maghiar, Albinka ^b   Mansard, Catherine ^a   Orkisz, Maciej ^a   Magnin, Isabelle E ^a   Douek, Philippe C ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b LOUIS PRADEL HOSPITAL   (France)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Carotid artery stenosis; Computer assisted image processing; Magnetic resonance angiography; Three dimensional image; Vascular diseases

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751438301     PISSN: 18616410     EISSN: 18616429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-006-0049-1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Lee VS, Doug JM, Krinsky GA, Rofsky NM (2000) Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: artifacts and pitfalls. Am J Roentgenol 175:197-205
2. Barbier C, Lefevre F, Bui P, Denny P, Aiouaz C, Becker S (2001) Contrast-enhanced MRA of the carotid arteries using 0.5 Tesla: comparison with selective digital angiography. J Radiol 82:245-249
3. Vanninen RL, Manninen HI, Partanen PK, Tulla H, Vainio PA (1996) How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography? Neuroradiol 38:299-305
4. Serfaty JM, Chirossel P, Chevallier JM, Ecochard R, Froment JC, Douek PC (2000) Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease. Am J Roentgenol 175:455-463
5. van Bemmel CM, Elgersma OEH, Vonken EPA, Fiorelli M, Leeuven MS, Niessen WJ (2004) Evaluation of semiautomated internal carotid artery stenosis quantification from 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced MRA. Invest Radiol 39:418-426
6. van Bemmel CM, Viergever MA, Niessen WJ (2004) Semi-automatic segmentation and stenosis quantification of 3D contrast-enhanced MR Angiograms of the internal carotid artery. Magn Reson Med 51:753-760
7. Wong KS, Lam WW, Liang E, Huang YN, Chan YL, Kay R (1996) Variability of magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography in grading middle cerebral artery stenosis. Stroke 6:1084-1087
8. NASCET Partners (1991) Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 325:445-453
9. ECAAS Partners (1995) Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 273:1421-1428
10. Elgersma OE, Wust AF, Buijs PC, van Der Graaf Y, Eikelboom BC, Mali WP (2000) Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography. Radiol 216:511-516
11. Hernández Hoyos M, Orkisz M, Puech P, Mansard-Desbleds C, Douek P, Magnin IE (2002) Computer assisted analysis of 3D MRA images. Radiographics 22:421-436
12. Hernández Hoyos M, Orkisz M, Douek PC, Magnin IE (2005) Assessment of carotid artery stenoses in 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, based on improved generation of the centerline. Mach Graph Vis 14:349-378
13. Hernández Hoyos M, Orlowski P, Piatkowska-Janko E, Bogorodzki P, Orkisz M (2006) Vascular centerline extraction in 3D MR angiograms for phase contrast MRI blood flow measurement. J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 1:51-61
14. Mukundan R, Ramakrishnan KR (1998) Moment functions in image analysis, theory and applications. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore 150 p
15. Hofman M, Visser F, van Rossum A, Vink Q, Sprenger M, Westerhof N (1995) In vivo validation of magnetic resonance blood volume flow measurements with limited spatial resolution in small vessels. Magn Reson Med 33:778-784
16. Hoogeveen R, Bakker C, Mali W, Viergever M (1997) Vessel diameter measurements in TOF and PC angiography: a need for standardization? In: 5th annual meeting International Society of Magnetic Resonance Medicine, Vancouver, p 1847
17. Hoogeveen RM, Bakker C, Viergever MA (1998) Limits to the accuracy of vessel diameter measurement in MR Angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:1228-1235
18. Frangi AF, Niessen WJ, Hoogeveen RM, Walsum T, Viergever MA (1999) Model-based quantitation of 3-D magnetic resonance angiographic images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:946-956
19. Renaudin CP, Barbier B, Roriz R, Revel D, Amiel M (1994) Coronary arteries: new design for three-dimensional arterial phantom. Radiol 190:579-582
20. Nonent M, Serfaty J-M, Nigoghossian N, Rouhart F, Derex L, Rotaru C, et al. (2004) Concordance rate differences of 3 noninvasive imaging techniques to measure carotid stenosis in clinical routine practice: results of the CARMEDAS multicenter study. Stroke 2235:682-686
21. Douek P, Revel D, Chazel S, Falise B, Villard J, Amiel M (1995) Fast MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries and arteries of the lower extremity: value of bolus-enhanced, whole-volume subtraction technique. Am J Roentgenol 165:431-437
22. Bland J, Altman D (1986) Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet I:307-310