Exploring the black box of a decision aid: What information do patients select from an interactive Cd-Rom on treatment options in breast cancer?

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 122-130

  Molenaar, Sjaak ^a   Sprangers, Mirjam ^a   Oort, Frans ^a   Rutgers, Emiel ^b   Luiten, Ernest ^c   Mulder, Jan ^d   van Meeteren, Marjolijn ^a   de Haes, Hanneke ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b ANTONI VAN LEEUWENHOEK HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c ST ANNA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^d MEDISCH SPECTRUM TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Decision making; Interactive decision aids

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPACT DISK; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLE SIZE; SCORING SYSTEM; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGEON; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AVOIDANCE LEARNING; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CD-ROM; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; MASTECTOMY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNCERTAINTY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33751416461     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.022     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Emanuel E.J., and Emanuel L.L. Four models of the doctor-patient relationship. J Am Med 267 (1996) 2221-2226
2. van den Borne H.W. The patient from receiver of information to informed decision-maker. Pat Educ Couns 34 (1998) 89-102
3. Degner L.F., Kristjanson L.J., Bowman D., et al. The patient-physician relationship: information needs and decisional preferences of in women with breast cancer. J Am Med 277 (1997) 1485-1492
4. Harris K.A. The informational needs of patients with cancer and their families. Cancer Pract. 6 (1998) 39-46
5. Goel V., Sawka C.A., Thiel E.C., Gort E.H., and O'Connor A.M. Randomized trial of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer. Med Decision Making 21 (2001) 1-6
6. Rees C., and Bath P.A. The informational needs and source preferences of women with breast cancer and their family members: a review of the literature published between 1988 and 1998. J Adv Nursing 31 (2001) 833-841
7. Deadman J.M., Leinster S.J., Owens R.G., Dewey M.E., and Slade P.D. Taking responsibility for cancer treatment. Soc Sci Med 53 (2001) 669-677
8. Kasper J.F., Mulley A.G., and Wennberg J.E. Developing shared decision-making programs to improve the quality of health care. Qual Rev Bull 18 (1992) 183-190
9. Charles C., Gafni A., and Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 49 (1999) 651-661
10. Tattersall M.H.N. Informing and involving cancer patients in their own care. Lancet Oncol 3 (2002) 629-637
11. Arora N.K., Johnson P., Gustafson D.H., McTavish F., Hawkins R.P., and Pingree S. Barriers to information access, perceived health competence, and psychosocial health outcomes: test of a mediation model in a breast cancer sample. Pat Educ Couns 47 (2002) 37-46
12. Wills C.E., and Holmes-Rovner M. Patient comprehension of information for shared treatment decision making: state of the art and future directions. Pat Edu Couns 50 (2003) 285-290
13. O'Connor A.M., Stacey D., Rovner D., et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library (2003), Update Software, Oxford [issue 1]
14. Molenaar S., Sprangers M.A.G., Postma-Schuit F.C.E., et al. Feasibility and effects of decision aids. Med Decision Making 20 (2000) 112-127
15. Bekker H.L., Hewison J., and Thornton J.G. Understanding why decision aids work: linking process with outcome. Pat Edu Couns 50 (2003) 323-329
16. O'Connor A., Jacobsen M.J., Elmslie T., et al. Simple vs complex patient decision aids: is more necessarily better?. Med Decision Making 20 (2000) 496 Abstract
17. Edwards A., Evans R., and Elwyn G. Manufactured but not imported: new directions for research in shared decision making support and skills. Pat Edu Couns 50 (2003) 33-38
18. Murray E., Davis H., See Tai S., Coulter A., Gray A., and Haines A. Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy in primary care. Br Med J 323 (2001) 1-6
19. Phelan E.A., Deyo R.A., Cherkin D.C., et al. Helping patients decide about back surgery: a randomized trial of an interactive video program. Spine 26 (2001) 206-211
20. Rostom A., O' Connor A.M., Tugwell P., and Wells G. A randomized trial of a computerized versus an audio-booklet decision aid for women considering post-menopausal hormone replacement therapy. Pat Edu Couns 46 (2002) 67-74
21. Morgan M.W., Deber R.B., Llewellyn-Thomas H.A., Gladstone P., Cusimano R.J., O'Rourke K., and Tomlinson G. Randomized, controlled trial of an interactive videodisc decision aid for patients with ischemic heart disease. J Gen Intern Med 15 (2000) 685-693
22. Levine M.N., Gafni A., Markham B., et al. A bedside decision instrument to elicit a patient's preference concerning adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Ann Int Med 117 (1992) 53-58
23. Barry M.J., Cherkin D.C., Chang Y., et al. A randomised trial of a multimedia shared decision-making program for men facing a treatment decision for benign prosthetic hyperplasia. Dis Man Clin Outcomes 1 (1997) 5-14
24. Street R.L., Voigt B., Geyer V.C., Manning T., and Swanson G.P. Increasing patiënt involvement in choosing treatment for early breast cancer. Cancer 76 (1995) 2275-2285
25. Lewis D. Computer-based approaches to patient education. A review of the literature. JAMA 6 (1999) 272-282
26. Molenaar S., Sprangers M.A.G., Rutgers E.J.Th., et al. Decision support for patients with early-stage breast cancer: effects of an interactive breast cancer CDROM on treatment decision, satisfaction, and quality of life. J Clin Oncol 19 (2001) 1676-1687
27. Molenaar S., Sprangers M., Rutgers E.J.T., Mulder H.J., Luiten E.J., and de Haes J.C. Interactive CDROM on the choice between breast-sparing treatment and mastectomy: positive responses from patients and surgeons (Article in Dutch). Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 145 (2001) 1004-1008
28. Measuring functioning and well-being. In: MOS Stewart A.L., and Ware J.E. (Eds). The medical outcomes study approach (1992), Duke University Press, Durham
29. Kempen G.I.J.M. Het meten van de gezondheidstoestand van ouderen. Een toepassing van een Nederlandse versie van de MOS-schaal. (Assessment of health status among the elderly; an application of a Dutch version of the MOS-survey). Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 23 (1992) 132-140
30. O'Connor A.M. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decision Making 15 (1995) 25-30
31. Koedoot N., Molenaar S., Oosterveld P., et al. The decisional conflict scale: further validation in two samples of Dutch oncology patients. Pat Educ Couns 45 (2001) 187-193
32. © (1995), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor