Manufactured but not imported: New directions for research in shared decision making support and skills

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 33-38

  Edwards, Adrian ^a   Evans, Rhodri ^a   Elwyn, Glyn ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Consumer involvement; Decision aids; Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

CANCER THERAPY; CONSUMER; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SKILL; TRAINING; VOCATIONAL EDUCATION;

EID: 0038290733     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00077-6     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T. Shared decision making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango). Soc. Sci. Med. 44:1997;681-692.
2. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T. Decision making in the professional-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc. Sci. Med. 49:1999;651-661.
3. Guadagnoli E., Ward P. Patient participation in decision making. Soc. Sci. Med. 47:1998;329-339.
4. Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision making. J. Health Services Res. Policy. 2:1997;112-121.
5. Elwyn G.J., Edwards A., Kinnersley P. Shared decision making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation. Br. J. Gen. Prac. 49:1999;477-482.
6. Holmes-Rovner M., Valade D., Orlowski C., Draus C., Nabozny-Valerio B., Keiser S. Implementing shared decision making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities. Health Expect. 3:2000;182-191.
7. Elwyn G, Charles C. Shared decision making: the principles and the competences. In: Edwards A, Elwyn G, editors. Evidence-based patient choice: inevitable or impossible? first ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001. p. 118-43.
8. Gwyn R., Elwyn G. When is a shared decision not (quite) a shared decision? Negotiating preferences in a general practice encounter. Soc. Sci. Med. 49:1999;437-447.
9. Kim Y, Kols A, Putjuk F, Heerey M, Rinehart W, Elwyn G, et al. Participation by clients and nurse midwives in family planning decision making in Indonesia. Patient Educ Counsel 2003, in press.
10. Elwyn G., Edwards A., Mowle S., Wensing M., Wilkinson C., Kinnersley P.et al. Measuring the involvement of patients in shared decision making: a systematic review of instruments. Patient Educ. Couns. 43:2001;5-22.
11. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R. Fleeting glimpses: measuring shared decision making in primary care using the OPTION instrument. Qual Safety Health Care 2002, in press.
12. Elwyn G., Edwards A., Kinnersley P., Grol R. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: defining the 'competences' of involving patients in health care choices. Br. J. Gen. Prac. 50:2000;892-899.
13. Towle A., Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. Br. Med. J. 319:1999;766-771.
14. O'Connor A.M., Rostom A., Fiset V., Tetroe J., Entwistle V., Llewelyn-Thomas H.et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. BMJ. 319:1999;731-734.
15. O'Connor A, Fiset V, Rosto A, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions [Cochrane Review]. Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Update Software; 2002.
16. Molenaar S., Spranger s.M., Postma-Shhuit C., Rutgers E., Noorlander J.et al. Feasibility and effects of decision aids. Med. Decision Making. 20:2000;112-127.
17. Feldman-Stewart D., Brundage M.D., van Manen L. A decision aid for men with early stage prostate cancer: theoretical basis and a test by surrogate patients. Health Expect. 4:2001;221-234.
18. Wright P. Document-based decision-making. In: Rouet JF, Levonen A, Biardeau A, editors. Multimedia learning: cognitive and instructional issues. Amsterdam: Pergamon Press; 2001. p. 31-43.
19. Edwards A., Elwyn G. The potential benefits of decision aids in clinical medicine. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 282:1999;779-780.
20. Bekker H. Genetic testing: facilitating informed choices. In: Encyclopaedia of the human genome. Nature Publishing Group; 2002.
21. Bekker H. Why decision analysis facilitates decision making: linking process and outcome measures. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Shared Decision Making in Health Care. Oxford; 2001.
22. Marteau T.M., Dormandy E., Michie S. A multi-dimensional measure of informed choice for use in Down's Syndrome screening. Health Expect. 4:2001;99-108.
23. Entwistle V.A., Sowden A.J., Watt I.S. Evaluating interventions to promote patient involvement in decision making: by what criteria should effectiveness be judged? J. Health Serv. Res. Policy. 3:1998;100-107.
24. O'Connor A.M. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med. Decision Making. 15:1995;25-30.
25. Edwards A., Elwyn G. How should 'effectiveness' of risk communication to aid patients' decisions be judged? A review of the literature. Med. Decision Making. 19:1999;428-434.
26. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Hood K, Robling M, Atwell C, Russell I, et al. The development of COMRADE: a patient-based outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision-making in consultations. Patient Educ Counsel 2003, in press.
27. Mazur D. The new medical conversation. Boulder, Connecticut: Rowman and Littlefield; 2002.
28. Eysenbach G. Recent advances: consumer health informatics. Br. Med. J. 320:2000;1713-1716.
29. Edwards A., Elwyn G. Understanding risk, and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences. Qual. Health Care. 10(Suppl I):2001;i9-13.