The Risks of Test-Tube Baby Making in Egypt

Risk, Culture, and Health Inequality: Shifting Perceptions of Danger and Blame

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 57-78

  Inhorn, Marcia C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751323554     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Abbey, Antonia, Frank M. Andrews, and L. Jill Halman. 1991. “Gender’s Role in Responses to Infertility.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 15(2): 295-316.
2. Amin, Ezzat. 2001. “The Epidemiologic Transition in Egypt.” Paper presented at the preconference workshop on “The Epidemiologic Transition among Arab Populations: Local-Global Connections.” University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, May 10.
3. Andrews, Lori B. 1999. The Clone Age: Adventures in the New World of Reproductive Technology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
4. Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5. Basyouny, Iman Farid. 1997. Just a Gaze-Female Clientele of Diet Clinics in Cairo: An Ethnomedical Study. Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press.
6. Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
7. Becker, Gaylene. 2000. The Elusive Embryo: How Women and Men Approach New Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
8. Bharadwaj, Aditya. 2001. “Conception Politics: Medical Egos, Media Spotlights, and the Contest over Testtube Firsts in India.” In Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies, eds. Marcia C. Inhorn and Frank van Balen, 315-333. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
9. Blank, Robert. 1998. “Regulation of Donor Insemination.” In Donor Insemination: International Social Science Perspectives, eds. Ken Daniels and Erica Haimes 131-150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Cates, W., Timothy M.M. Farley, and Patrick J. Rowe. 1985. “Worldwide Patterns of Infertility: Is Africa Different?" The Lancet 2(8455): 596-598.
11. Collet, M., J. Reniers, E. Frost, R. Gass, F. Yvert, A. Leclerc, C. Roth-Meyer, B. Ivanoff, and A. Meheus. 1988. “Infertility in Central Africa: Infection Is the Cause.” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 26(3): 423-428.
12. Condit, Celeste Michelle. 1994. “Hegemony in a Mass-Mediated Society: Concordance about Reproductive Technologies.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 11(3): 205-230.
13. Corea, Gena, Renate Duelli Klein, Jalna Hanmer, Helen B. Holmes, Betty Hoskings, Madhu Kishwar, Janice Raymond, Robyn Rowland, and Roberta Steinbacher. 1987. Man-Made Women: How New Reproductive Technologies Affect Women. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
14. DeClerque, Julia, Amy Ong Tsui, Mohammed Futuah Abul-Ata, and Delia Barcelona. 1986. “Rumor, Misinformation and Oral Contraceptive Use in Egypt.” Social Science & Medicine 23(1): 83-92.
15. Delaney, Carol. 1991. The Seed and the Soil: Gender and Cosmology in Turkish Village Society. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
16. Devroey, Paul, M. Vandervorst, Peter Nagy, and Andre Van Steirteghem. 1998. “Do We Treat the Male or His Gamete?" Human Reproduction 13 (Supplement 1): 178-185.
17. Douglas, Mary. 1992. Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge Press.
18. Early, Evelyn A. 1993. Baladi Women of Cairo: Playing with an Egg and a Stone. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
19. El-Mehairy, Theresa. 1984. Medical Doctors: A Study of Role Concept and Job Satisfaction, the Egyptian Case. Leiden, The Netherlands: E. J. Brill.
20. Ericksen, Karen, and Tracy Brunette. 1996. “Patterns and Predictors of Infertility among African Women: A Cross-national Survey of Twenty-seven Nations.” Social Science & Medicine 42(2): 209-220.
21. Fakih, Dr. Michael. Personal communication. June 19, 2002.
22. Farquhar, Dion. 1996. The Other Machine: Discourse and Reproductive Technologies. New York: Routledge Press.
23. Franklin, Sarah. 1997. Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. New York: Routledge Press.
24. Freeman, Carla. 1999. High Tech and High Heels in the Global Economy: Women, Work, and Pink-collar Identities in the Caribbean. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
25. Freudenburg, William R. 1988. “Perceived Risk, Real Risk.” Science 242(4875): 44-49.
26. Furedi, Frank. 1997. Culture of Fear: Risk-Taking and the Morality of Low Expectation. London: Cassell.
27. Ginsburg, Faye D., and Rayna Rapp. 1995. “Introduction: Conceiving the New World Order.” In Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction, eds. Faye D. Ginsburg and Rayna Rapp, 1-17. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
28. Greil, Arthur L., Thomas M. Leitko, and Karen L. Porter. 1988. “Infertility: His and Hers.” Gender & Society 2(2): 172-199.
29. Hamberger, L., and P.O. Janson. 1997. “Global Importance of Infertility and Its Treatment: Role of Fertility Technologies.” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 58(1): 149-158.
30. Handwerker, Lisa. 2001. “The Politics of Making Modern Babies in China: Reproductive Technologies and the ‘New’ Eugenics.” In Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies, eds. Marcia C. Inhorn and Frank van Balen, 298-314. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
31. Hannerz, Ulf. 1996. Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places. London: Routledge Press.
32. Hartouni, Valerie. 1997. Cultural Conceptions: On Reproductive Technologies and the Remaking of Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33. Howards, Stuart S. 1995. “Treatment of Male Infertility.” The New England Journal of Medicine 332(5): 311-317.
34. Inhorn, Marcia C. 1994. Quest for Conception: Gender, Infertility, and Egyptian Medical Traditions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
35. Inhorn, Marcia C. 1996. Infertility and Patriarchy: The Cultural Politics of Gender and Family Life. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
36. Inhorn, Marcia C. 2002. “Global Infertility and the Globalization of New Reproductive Technologies: Illustrations from Egypt.” Social Science & Medicine.
37. Inhorn, Marcia C. 2003. "‘The Worms Are Weak’: Male Infertility and Patriarchal Paradoxes in Egypt.” Men & Masculinities 5: 238-258.
38. Inhorn, Marcia C. Forthcoming, 2003. Local Babies, Global Science: Gender, Religion, and In Vitro Fertilization in Egypt. New York: Routledge Press.
39. Kahn, Susan Martha. 2000. Reproducing Jews: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception in Israel. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
40. Kahn, Susan Martha. 2001. “Rabbis and Reproduction: The Uses of New Reproductive Technologies among Ultraorthodox Jews in Israel.” In Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies, eds. Marcia C. Inhorn and Frank van Balen, 283-297. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
41. Kamischke, Axel, and Eberhard Nieschlag. 1998. “Conventional Treatments of Male Infertility in the Age of Evidence-Based Andrology.” Human Reproduction 13 (Supplement 1): 62-75.
42. Kasperson, Roger E. 1992. “The Social Amplification of Risk: Progress in Developing an Integrative Framework.” In Social Theories of Risk, eds. Sheldon Krimsky and Dominic Golding, 153-178. Westport, CT: Praeger.
43. Klein, Renate. 1989. Infertility: Women Speak Out about Their Experiences of Reproductive Medicine. London: Pandora Press.
44. Kleinman, Arthur M. 1992. “Local Worlds of Suffering: An Interpersonal Focus for Ethnographies of Illness Experience.” Qualitative Health Research 2(2): 127-134.
45. Lane, Sandra D. 1997. “Gender and Health: Abortion in Urban Egypt.” In Population, Poverty, and Politics in Middle East Cities, ed. Michael E. Bonine, 208-234. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
46. Larsen, Ulla. 1994. “Sterility in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Population Studies 48(3): 459-474.
47. Larsen, Ulla. 2000. “Primary and Secondary Infertility in Sub-Saharan Africa.” International Journal of Epidemiology 29(2): 285-291.
48. Leonard, Lori. 2001. “Problematizing Fertility: ‘Scientific’ Accounts and Chadian Women’s Narratives.” In Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies, eds. Marcia C. Inhorn and Frank van Balen, 193-214. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
49. Lublin, Nancy. 1998. Pandora’s Box: Feminism Confronts Reproductive Technology. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
50. McNeil, Maureen, Ian Varcoe, and Steven Yearley, eds. 1990. The New Reproductive Technologies. London: Macmillan.
51. Meirow, Dror, and Joseph G. Schenker. 1997. “The Current Status of Sperm Donation in Assisted Reproduction Technology: Ethical and Legal Considerations.” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 14(3): 133-138.
52. Mitchell, Tim. 1991. “America’s Egypt: Discourse of the Development Industry.” Middle East Report 21(2): 18-36.
53. Nicholson, Roberto F., and Roberto E. Nicholson. 1994. “Assisted Reproduction in Latin America.” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 11(9): 438-444.
54. Okonofua, Friday. 1996. “The Case against New Reproductive Technologies in Developing Countries.” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 103(10): 957-962.
55. Overall, Christine, ed. 1989. The Future of Human Reproduction. Toronto, Ontario: The Women’s Press.
56. Population Reference Bureau. 1999. World Population Data Sheet: Demographic Data and Estimates for the Countries and Regions of the World. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.
57. Ratcliff, Kathryn Strother, ed. 1989. Healing Technology: Feminist Perspectives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
58. Raymond, Janice G. 1993. Women as Wombs: Reproductive Technologies and the Battle Over Women’s Freedom. San Francisco: Harper.
59. Robertson, John A. 1996. “Legal Troublespots in Assisted Reproduction.” Fertility and Sterility 65(1): 11-12.
60. Rothman, Barbara Katz. 1989. Recreating Motherhood: Ideology and Technology in a Patriarchal Society. New York: W.W. Norton.
61. Rowland, Robyn. 1992. Living Laboratories: Women and Reproductive Technology. London: Octopus Publishing.
62. Sandelowski, Margarete, and Sheryl de Lacey. 2001. “The Uses of a ‘Disease’: Infertility as Rhetorical Vehicle.” In Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies, eds. Marcia C. Inhorn and Frank van Balen, 33-51. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
63. Sandelowski, Margarete, Betty G. Harris, and Beth Perry Black. 1992. “Relinquishing Infertility: The Work of Pregnancy for Infertile Couples.” Qualitative Health Research 2(3): 282-301.
64. Scholz, T., S. Bartholomaus, I. Grimmer, H. Kentenich, and M. Obladen. 1999. “Problems of Multiple Births After ART: Medical, Psychological, Social and Financial Aspects.” Human Reproduction 14(12): 2932-2937.
65. Sciarra, J. 1994. “Infertility: An International Health Problem.” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 46(2): 155-163.
66. Sciarra, J. 1997. “Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Global Importance.” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 58(1): 107-119.
67. Scutt, Jocelynne A., ed. 1990. The Baby Machine: Reproductive Technology and the Commercialisation of Motherhood. London: Merlin Press.
68. Serour, Gamal I. 1992. “Medically Assisted Conception: Dilemma of Practice and Research-Islamic Views.” In Proceedings of the First International Conference on “Bioethics in Human Reproduction Research in the Muslim World,” 10-13 December, 1991, ed. Gamal I. Serour, 234-242. Cairo: International Islamic Center for Population Studies and Research, Al-Azhar University.
69. Serour, Gamal I. 1996. “Bioethics in Reproductive Health: A Muslim’s Perspective.” Middle East Fertility Society Journal 1(1): 30-35.
70. Slovic, Paul. 1992. “Perception of Risk: Reflections on the Psychometric Paradigm.” In Social Theories of Risk, eds. Sheldon Krimsky and Dominic Golding, 117-152. Westport, CT: Praeger.
71. Spallone, Patricia, and Deborah Lynn Steinberg, eds. 1987. Made to Order: The Myth of Reproductive and Genetic Progress. Oxford: Pergamon.
72. Squier, Susan Merrill. 1994. Babies in Bottles: Twentieth-Century Visions of Reproductive Technology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
73. Stanworth, Michelle, ed. 1987. Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. Cambridge: Polity Press.
74. Thompson, Charis M. 2001. “Fertile Ground: Feminists Theorize Infertility.” In Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies, eds. Marcia C. Inhorn and Frank van Balen, 52-78. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
75. Van Balen, Frank, and Trudie Gerrits. 2001. “Quality of Infertility Care in Poor-Resource Areas and the Introduction of New Reproductive Technologies.” Human Reproduction 16(2): 215-219.
76. Van Dyck, Jose. 1995. Manufacturing Babies and Public Consent: Debating the New Reproductive Technologies. London: Macmillan.
77. World Health Organization. 1987. “Infections, Pregnancies, and Infertility: Perspectives on Prevention.” Fertility and Sterility 47(6): 964-968.