A process modeling methodology for automation of manual and time dependent processes

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Nagel, Robert L ^a   Stone, Robert B ^a   McAdams, Daniel A ^a  

^a Architectural and Environmental Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFORMAL MAPPING; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROCESS ENGINEERING;

FUNCTIONAL MODELING; HUMAN CENTRIC PROCESS; TIME DEPENDENT PROCESSES;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 33751317681     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/detc2006-99437     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Ulrich, K.T. and S.D. Eppinger, Product Design and Development. 2004, Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
2. Cutherell, D., Chapter 16: Product Architecture, in The PDMA Handbook of New Product Development, M. Rosenau Jr., Editor. 1996, Wiley and Sons.
3. Fenves, S., A Core Product Model for Representing Design Information. 2001, National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD.
4. Hundal, M., A Systematic Method for Developing Function Structures, Solutions and Concept Variants. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 1990. 25(3): p. 243-256.
5. Miles, L., Techniques of Value Analysis Engineering. 1972, New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Pahl, G. and W. Beitz, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. 1996: Springer Verlag.
7. Tumer, I. Y. and R.B. Stone, Analytical Methods for Mapping Function to Failure During High-Risk Component Development. Research in Engineering Design, 2003. 14(1): p. 25-33.
8. Ullman, D.G., The Mechanical Design Process 3rd Edition. 2002, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
9. Dieter, G., Engineering Design: A Materials and Processing Approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Series in Mechanical Engineering, ed. J. Holman and J. Lloyd. 1991, New York: McGraw-Hill. 721.
10. Otto, K. and K. Wood, Product Design Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development. 2001, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11. Hirtz, J., et al., A Functional Basis for Engineering Design: Reconciling and Evolving Previous Efforts. Research in Engineering Design, 2002. 13(2): p. 65-82.
12. U.S. Office of Personnel Management. OPM Workforce Planning: 5 Step Workforce Planning Model. 2001 [cited 12 Jan. 2006; Available from: http://www.opm.gov/workforceplanning/wfpmodel.htm.
13. Sharman, D. and A. Yassine, Characterizing Complex Product Architectures. Systems Engineering, 2004. 7(1): p. 35-60.
14. Ju, T.L. Process Definition for Adaptable Workflow Management Systems. in XML Europe Conference. 2001. Berlin, Germany: Internationales Congress Centrum (ICC).
15. Eder, J. and W. Liebhart. The Workflow Activity Model WAMO. in International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS). 1995. Vienna, Austria.
16. NIST, Integration Definition for Function Modeling (IDEFO). 1993: Information Processing Standards Publications (FIPS PUBS).
17. Stone, R. and K. Wood, Development of a Functional Basis for Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2000. 122(4): p. 359-370.
18. Ahmed, S. and K. Wallace. Evaluating a Functional Basis. in Proceedings of DETC'03. 2003. Chicago, IL: ASME.
19. Kärcher Futuretech GmbH, TEP 90 Decontamination System: State of the Art in Decon Technology, in NBC Protection Systems. 2005: Germany.
20. Stone, R., K. Wood, and R. Crawford, Using Quantitative Functional Models to Develop Product Architectures. Design Studies, 2000. 21(3): p. 239-260.
21. McAdams, D., R.B. Stone, and K.L. Wood, Functional interdependance and product similarity based on customer needs. Research in Engineering Design, 1999. 11(1).