Students' use of technological features while solving a mathematics problem

Journal of Mathematical Behavior

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 252-266

  Lee, Hollylynne Stohl ^a   Hollebrands, Karen F ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Applet; Design; Mathematics; Middle school; Problem solving; Research methodology; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751237956     PISSN: 07323123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2006.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ainsworth S.E. A functional taxonomy of multiple representations. Computers and Education 33 2-3 (1999) 171-188
2. Balacheff, N., & Sutherland, R. (1994). Epistemological domain of validity of microworlds: The case of Logo and Cabri-géomètre. In R. Lewis & P. Mendelsohn (Eds.), Lessons from learning (pp. 137-150), IFIP Conference TC3WG3.3 North Holland.
3. Clements D.H. From exercises and tasks to problems and projects: Unique contributions of computers to innovative mathematics education. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 19 (2000) 9-47
4. Clements D.H. Viewpoint: We need integrated research and software development. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 22 3 & 4 (2000) 179-183
5. Clements D.H., and Battista M.T. Developing effective software. In: Kelly E., and Lesh R.A. (Eds). Handbook of innovative research design in mathematics and science education (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 761-776
6. Dufour-Janvier B., Bednarz N., and Belanger M. Pedagogical considerations concerning the problem of representation. In: Janvier C. (Ed). Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (1987), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 109-122
7. Healy L., and Hoyles C. Software tools for geometrical problem solving: Potentials and pitfalls. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 6 3 (2001) 235-256
8. Jonassen D.H. Learning to solve problems: An instructional design guide (2004), San Francisco, Wiley
9. Kaput J. Technology and mathematics education. In: Grouws D. (Ed). A handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (1992), MacMillan, New York 515-556
10. Lee H.S. Facilitating students' problem solving: Prospective teachers' learning trajectory in a technological context. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 8 3 (2005) 223-254
11. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics (1989), Author, Reston, VA
12. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Principles and standards for school mathematics (2000), Author, Reston, VA
13. Polya G. How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. 2nd ed. (1957), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
14. Repenning, A., (2002). AgentSheets. Software distributed at, http://agentsheets.com.
15. Roschelle J., and Jackiw N. Technology design as educational research: Interweaving imagination, inquiry and impact. In: Kelly A., and Lesh R. (Eds). Research design in mathematics and science education (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ 777-797
16. Schoenfeld A.H. Mathematical problem solving (1985), Academic Press, Orlando, FL
17. Schoenfeld A. Cognitive science and mathematics education (1987), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
18. Schoenfeld A.H. Learning to think mathematically: Problem-solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In: Grouws D. (Ed). Handbook on research on mathematics teaching and learning (1992), Macmillan, New York 334-367
19. Underwood J., Hoadley C., Lee H.S., Hollebrands K.F., DiGiano C., and Renninger K.A. IDEA: Identifying design principles in educational applets. Educational Technology Research and Development 53 2 (2005) 99-112
20. Yerushalmy M. Functions of interactive visual representations in interactive mathematical textbooks. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 10 (2005) 217-249