Space-time separation during obstacle-avoidance learning in monkeys

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 96, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 2613-2632

  Torres, Elizabeth ^a   Andersen, Richard ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; BODY POSTURE; GEOMETRY; LEARNING; MALE; MOTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL ORIENTATION;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; AVOIDANCE LEARNING; COGNITION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FOREARM; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33751227793     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00188.2006     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abend W, Bizzi E, and Morasso P. Human arm trajectory formation. Brain 105: 331-348, 1982.
2. Alexander RM. A minimum energy cost hypothesis for human arm trajectories. Biol Cybern 76: 97-105, 1997.
3. Atkeson CG and Hollerbach JM. Kinematics features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. J Neurosci 5: 2318-2330, 1985.
4. Della-Maggiore V, Malfait N, Ostry DJ, and Paus T. Stimulation of the posterior parietal cortex interferes with arm trajectory adjustments during learning of new dynamics. J Neurosci 24: 9971-9976, 2004.
5. Do Carmo M. Riemannian Geometry. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992.
6. Feynman R, Leighton RB, and Sands M. The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1965.
7. Flash T and Hogan N. The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5: 1688-1703, 1985.
8. Glover S, Miall C, and Rushworth F. Parietal rTMS disrupts the initiation but not the execution of on-line adjustments to a perturbation of object size. J Cogn Neurosci 17: 124-136, 2005.
9. Harris CM and Wolpert DM. Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394: 780-784, 1998.
10. Hatsopoulos NG, Paninski L, and Donoghue JP. Sequential movement representations based on correlated neuronal activity. Exp Brain Res 149: 478-486, 2003.
11. Jordan MI and Wolpert DM. Computational Motor Control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
12. Jose JV and Saletan EJ. Classical Mechanics: A Contemporary Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998.
13. Karnath H-O and Perenin M. Cortical control of visually guided reaching: evidence from patients with optic ataxia. Cereb Cortex 15: 1561-1569, 2005.
14. Kay D. Theories and Problems of Tensor Calculus. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988.
15. Konczak J and Dichgans J. The development of hand trajectory formation and joint kinematics during reaching in infancy. In: Three-Dimensional Kinematics of Eye, Head, and Limb Movements, edited by Fetter M, Haslwanter T, Misslisch H, and Tweed D. Sydney, Australia: Harwood Academic, 1997.
16. Lanczos C. The Variational Principles of Mechanics. New York: Dover, 1970.
17. McNitt-Gray J. Neuromuscular Control and Performance of Gymnastics Landing. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science, 2000.
18. Morasso P and Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Trajectory formation and handwriting: a computational model. Biol Cybern 45: 131-142, 1982.
19. Nishikawa KC, Murray ST, and Flanders M. Do arm postures vary with the speed of reaching? J Neurophysiol 81: 2582-2586, 1999.
20. Rencher AC. Methods of Multivariate Analysis. New York: Wiley, 1995.
21. Shadmehr R and Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208-3224, 1994.
22. Sirigu A, Duhamel J, Cohen L, Pillon B, Dubois B, and Agid Y. The mental representation of hand movement after parietal cortex damage. Science 273: 1564-1568, 1996.
23. Soechting J, Buneo C, and Flanders M. Moving effortless in three dimensions: does Donders' law apply to arm movement? J Neurosci 15: 6271-6280, 1995.
24. Todorov E. Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nat Neurosci 7: 907-915, 2004.
25. Todorov E and Jordan M. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5: 1226, 2002.
26. Torres EB. Theoretical framework for the study of sensori-motor integration. In: Cognitive Science. La Jolla, CA: University of California San Diego, 2001, p. 115.
27. Torres EB and Zipser D. Reaching to grasp with a multi-jointed arm. I. A computational model. J Neurophysiol 88: 1-13, 2002.
28. Torres EB and Zipser D. Simultaneous control of hand displacements and rotations in orientation-matching experiments. J Appl Physiol 96: 1978-1987, 2004.
29. Uno Y, Fukumura N, Suzuki R, and Kawato M. A computational model for recognizing objects and planning handshapes in grasping movements. Neural Netw 8: 839-851, 1995.
30. Uno Y, Kawato M, and Suzuki R. Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement. Minimum torque-change model. Biol Cybern 61: 89-101, 1989.
31. Viviani P and Flash T. Minimum jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21: 2-53, 1995.
32. Viviani P and Schneider RA. A developmental study of the relationship between geometry and kinematics of drawing movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17: 198-218, 1991.
33. Wada Y and Kawato M. A via-point time optimization algorithm for complex sequential trajectory formation. Neural Netw 17: 353-364, 2004.
34. Zipser D and Andersen R. A back-propagation programmed network that simulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons. Nature 331: 679-684, 1988.