Imaging of cochlear implants

Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 385-392

  Chaturvedi, A ^a   Mohan, C ^a   Mahajan, S B ^a   Kakkar, Vipin ^a  

^a Command Hospital ^*  (India)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; HRCT temporal bone; MRI cochlea

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE MALFORMATION; BONE SCINTISCANNING; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA DUCT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONGENITAL BLOOD VESSEL MALFORMATION; CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE AVAILABILITY; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INNER EAR MALFORMATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MASTOID; MIDDLE EAR MALFORMATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RELIABILITY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; TEMPORAL BONE;

EID: 33751226864     PISSN: 09713026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.29025     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Gleeson TG, Lacy PD, Bresnihan M, Gaffney R, Brennan P, Viani L. High resolution computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the pre-operative assessment of cochlear implant patients. J Laryngol Otol. 2003 Sep; 117(9):692-5.
2. Fishman AJ, Holliday RA. Principles of Cochlear Implant Imaging. Cochlear Implants. Thieme Medical Publishers Inc: 2000.pgs 79-103
3. Jackler RK, Luxford WM, House WF. Congenital Malformations of the inner ear: a classification based on embryogenesis. Laryngoscope 1987; 97:2-14.
4. Harnsberger HR, Dart DJ, Parkin JL, Smoker WR, Osborne AG. Cochlear Implant candidates: assessment with CT and MR imaging. Radiology 1987 164: 53-57.
5. Schwartz JD, Mandell DM, Faerber EN et al. Labyrinthine ossification: etiologies and CT findings. Radiology 1985; 157:395-98.
6. Abdullah A, Mahmud MR, Maimunah A, Zulfiqar MA, Saim L, Mazlan R. Preoperative high resolution CT and MR imaging in cochlear implantation. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2003 Jul; 32(4):442-5.
7. Jackler RK, Luxford WM, Schindler Ra, McKerrow WS. Cochlear patency problems in cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 1987;97:801-805
8. Parry DA, Booth T, Roland PS. Advantages of magnetic resonance imaging over computed tomography in preoperative evaluation of pediatric cochlear implant candidates. Otol Neurotol. 2005 Sep; 26(5):976-82.
9. Bettman R, Beek E, Van Olphen A, Zonneveld F, Huizing E. MRI versus CT in assessment of cochlear patency in cochlear implant candidates. Acta Otolaryngol. 2004 Jun; 124(5):577-81.
10. Frau GN; Luxford WM, William WM, Berliner K. High Resolution Computed Tomography in Evaluation of Cochlear Patency in Implant Candidates. J of Laryngology and Otology 1994; 108:743-748.
11. Lemmerling M, Vanzeileghem B, Dhooge I, et al. CT and MRI of the semicircular canals in normal and diseased temporal bone. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:1210-9.
12. Purcell D, Johnson J, Fischbein N, Lalwani A. Establishment of normative cochlear and vestibular measurements to aid in the diagnosis of inner ear malformations. Otol Head Neck Surg 2003; 128:78-87.
13. Magnetic resonance imaging and cochlear implants: compatibility and safety aspects. Teissl C, Kremser C, Hochmair ES, Hochmair-Desoyer IJ. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Jan; 9(1):26-38.
14. Clinical results of the CLARION magnet less cochlear implant. Weber BP, Neuburger J, Goldring JE, Santogrossi T, Koestler H, Battmer RD, Lenarz T. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1999 Apr; 177:22-6.
15. Ellul S, Shelton c, Davidson, HC, Harnsberger HR. Preoperative Cochlear implant imaging: Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging Enough? American Journal of Otology 2000; 21:528-533.