Advantages of magnetic resonance imaging over computed tomography in preoperative evaluation of pediatric cochlear implant candidates

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 976-982

  Parry, David Alan ^a   Booth, Timothy ^a   Roland, Peter S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implantation; HRCT; MRI; Pediatric

Indexed keywords

APLASIA; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILDHOOD DISEASE; COCHLEA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOLYMPHATIC SAC; HIGH RESOLUTION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEURORADIOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFT TISSUE; TEMPORAL BONE; VESTIBULE;

CHILD; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; EAR, INNER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TEMPORAL BONE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 24944469025     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000185049.61770.da     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Cheng AK, Rubin HR, Powe NR, et al. Cost-utility analysis of the cochlear implant in children. JAMA 2000;284:850-6.
2. Mohr P, Feldman J, Dunbar J, et al. The societal costs of severe to profound hearing loss in the United States. Int J Tech Assess 2000;16:1120-35.
3. Jackler RK, Dillon WP: Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the inner ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;99:494-504.
4. Mafong DD, Shin EJ, Lalwani AK. Use of laboratory evaluation and radiologic imaging in the diagnostic evaluation of children with sensorineural hearing loss. Laryngoscope 2002;112:1-7.
5. Bamiou DE, Worth S, Phelps P, et al. Eighth nerve aplasia and hypoplasia in cochlear implant candidates: The clinical perspective. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:492-6.
6. Seidman DA, Chute PM, Parisier S, et al. Temporal bone imaging for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 1994;104:562-5.
7. Casselman JW, Offeciers FE, Govaerts PJ, et al. Aplasia and hypoplasia of the vestibulocochlear nerve: Diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1997;202:773-81.
8. Arriaga MA, Carrier D. MRI and clinical decisions in cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 1996;17:547-53.
9. Lemmerling MM, Mancuso AA, Antonelli PJ, Kubilis PS. Normal modiolus: CT appearance in patients with a large vestibular aqueduct. Radiology 1997;204;213-9.
10. Phelps PD, Proops DW. Imaging for cochlear implants. J Laryngol Otol 1999;113:21-3.
11. Steenerson RL, Gary LB. Multichannel cochlear implantation in obliterated cochleas using the Gantz procedure. Laryngoscope 1994;104:1071-3.
12. Okamoto K, Ito J, Furusawa T, et al. MRI of enlarged endolymphatic sacs in the large vestibular aqueduct syndrome. Head Neck Radiol 1998;40:167-72.
13. Aschendorff A, Marangos N, Laszig R. Large vestibular aqueduct syndrome and its implication for cochlear implant surgery. Am J Otol 1997;18(Suppl):S57.
14. Okumura T, Takahashi H, Honjo I, et al. Sensorineural hearing loss in patients with large vestibular aqueduct. Laryngoscope 1995;105:289-94.
15. Nager GT, Proctor B. Anatomic variations and anomalies involving the facial canal. Oto Clin North Am 1991;24:531-53.
16. Goh JPN, Chan LL, Tan TY. MRI of cochlear otosclerosis. Br J Radiol 2002;75:502-5.