Some loopholes to save quantum nonlocality

AIP Conference Proceedings

Volumn 750, Issue , 2005, Pages 1-20

  Accardi, Luigi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751224530     PISSN: 0094243X     EISSN: 15517616     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1874552     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. L. Accardi and A. Fedullo, "On the statistical meaning of complex numbers in quantum theory", Lettere al Nuovo Cimento, 34, 161-172 (1982), University of Salerno preprint May (1981).
2. L. Accardi, "Topics in quantum probability", Phys. Rep., 77 pp. 169-192 (1981).
3. L. Accardi, The probabilistic roots of the quantum mechanical paradoxes , In: The wave-particle dualism, S. Diner, G. Lochak, and F. Selleri (eds.) Reidel, Dordrecht (1984) pp. 297-330.
4. L. Accardi, Einstein-Bohr: one all, in: The interpretation of quantum theory: where do we stand? Acta Enciclopedica, Istituto dell'Enciclopedia Italiana (1994) pp. 95-115, Volterra preprint No. 174 (1993).
5. L. Accardi and M. Regoli, Locality and Bell's inequality, in: QP-PQ XIII, Foundations of Probability and Physics, A. Khrennikov (ed.), World Scientific (2002) 1-28 Preprint Volterra, N. 427 (2000) quant-ph/0007005.
6. L. Accardi, K. Imafuku and M. Regoli, "On the physical meaning of the EPR-chameleon experiment", Infinite dimensional analysis, quantum probability and related topics , 5, N. 1, pp. 1-20 (2002), quant-ph/0112067 Volterra Preprint N. 494 December (2001).
7. L. Accardi, K. Imafuku and M. Regoli, Adaptive dynamical systems and the EPR-chameleon experiment, in: Proc. Conf. "Foundations of Probability and Physics-2", Vaxjo, June 2-7 (2002), Vaxjo University Press, Ser. Math. Modelling in Phys., Engin., and Cogn. Sc., vol. 5 (2003) pp. 11-36.
8. A. Aspect, P. Grangier and G. Roger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982).
9. P. Ball, Exorcising Einstein's spooks, Nature 29 November (2001).
10. J.S. Bell, "Bertlmann's Socks and the Nature of Reality", Journal de Physique, 42, Colloque suppl. C2, pp. 41-61 (1981).
11. J.S. Bell, On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox", Physics, 1 no. 3, pp. 195-200 (1964).
12. G. Brassard, R. Cleve and A. Tapp, The cost of exactly simulating quantum entanglement with classical communication , quant-ph/9901035.
13. T. Brody, (Springer 1994): Compilation Ed. by De La Pena and P. Hudson Real and imaginary non localit in: Brody T., De La Pena Nuovo Cimento, 58B, p. 455 (1979), [citato da A. Rizzi].
14. J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony and R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Letters, 49, pp. 1804-1806 (1969),
15. in: "J. S. Bell, Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics", Cambridge Univ. Press (1987).
16. M. Czachor, "On classical models of spin", Foundations of Physics Letters, vol. 5 n. 3 (1992).
17. M. Czachor, "On some class of random variables leading to violations of the Bell inequality", Physics Letters A, vol. 129, n. 5 6 (1988).
18. W. De Baere andW. Struyve, Subquantum nonreproducibility and the complete local description of physical reality , Preprint (2001).
19. W.M. de Muynck, Interpretations of quantum mechanics, and interpretations of violation of Bell's inequality , Preprint 2001.
20. W.M. de Muynck, W. De Baere and H. Martens, "Interpretations of quantum mechanics, joint measurement of incompatible observables, and counterfactual definiteness", Foundations of Physics , 24, (12) pp. 1589-1663 (1994), Discussed in: [32].
21. R.P. Feynmann, R.P. Leighton and M. Sands, Lectures on Physics, III, Addison-Wesley (1966).
22. L.E. Szabo and A. Fine, A local hidden variable theory for the GHZ experiment , quant-ph/0007102.
23. R.D. Gill, quant-ph/0301059 Time, Finite Statistics, and Bell's Fifth Position, Richard D. Gill in: Proc. of "Foundations of Probability and Physics-2", Ser. Math. Modelling in Phys., Engin., and Cogn. Sc., vol. 5/, Växjö Univ. Press (2003) pp. 179-206.
24. N. Gisin and B. Gisin, "A local hidden variable model of quantum correlation exploiting the detection loophole", Phys. Lett. A, 260, pp. 323-327 (1999), Quant-ph/9905018 6 may 1999, version of April, 22 (2001).
25. K. Hess and W. Philipp, "A possible loophole in the Bell's theorem and the problem of decidability between the views of Einstein and Bohr", PNAS, 98, 25, pp. 14228-14233 (2001).
26. K. Hess and W. Philipp, "A possible loophole in the theorem of Bell", PNAS, 98, 25, pp. 14224-14227 (2001).
27. A.Yu. Khrennikov, Non-Archimedean analysis: quantum paradoxes, dynamical systems and biological models , Kluwer Acad.Publ., Dordreht (1997).
28. A. Khrennikov, O.G. Smolyanov and A. Truman, Kolmogorov probability spaces describing Accardi models of quantum correlations, to appear in: Open Systems and Information Dynamics (2004).
29. T. Miyadera and M. Ohya, On Chameleon effect and Bell's inequality, communication at the: International Conference: Quantum Information 2003, mathematical, physical engineering and industrial aspects (ICQI03IIAS), November, 5-7, (2003), to appear.
30. P. Pearle, "Hidden-variable example based upon data rejection", Physical Review D vol. 2 (8) pp. 1418-1425 (1970).
31. S. Notarrigo, "A Newtonian separable model which violates Bell's inequality", Il Nuovo Cimento, 83B, (2) pp. 173-187 (1984).
32. M. Steiner, Towards quantifying non-local information transfer: finite-bit non-locality , quant-ph/9902014.
33. H.P. Stapp, "Comments on "Interpretation of quantum mechanics, joint measurement od incompatible observables, and counterfactual definitess", Foundations of Physics , 24 (12) (1994).
34. A. Tartaglia, "Is the EPR paradox a paradox?", Eur. J. Phys., 19, p. 307 (1998).
35. G. Weigh, T. Jennewein, C. Simon, H. Weinfurter and A. Zeillinger, "Violation of Bell's inequalitiy under strict Einstein locality conditions", Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, pp. 5039-5043 (1998).