A local hidden variable model of quantum correlation exploiting the detection loophole

Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics

Volumn 260, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 323-327

  Gisin, N ^a   Gisin, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BELLS; EFFICIENCY;

BELL INEQUALITIES; BELL THEOREM; DETECTOR EFFICIENCY; HIDDEN VARIABLE; LOCAL HIDDEN-VARIABLE MODELS; QUANTUM CORRELATIONS; ROTATIONAL SYMMETRIES; SINGLET STATE;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0001817392     PISSN: 03759601     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00519-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. J.S. Bell, Physics 1 (1964) 195.
2. D. Rohrlich, S. Popescu, Found. Phys. 24 (1994) 379.
3. P. Pearle, Phys. Rev. D 2 (1970) 1418.
4. J.F. Clauser, M.A. Home, A. Shimony, R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 880; E. Santos, Phys. Rev. A 46 (1992) 3646; P. Kwiat et al., Phys. Rev. A 49 (1994) 3209; E.S. Fry, T. Walther, S. Li, Phys. Rev. A 52 (1995) 4381; Huelga et al., Phys.Rev. A 51 (1995) 5008.
5. J.F. Clauser, M.A. Home, A. Shimony, R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 880; E. Santos, Phys. Rev. A 46 (1992) 3646; P. Kwiat et al., Phys. Rev. A 49 (1994) 3209; E.S. Fry, T. Walther, S. Li, Phys. Rev. A 52 (1995) 4381; Huelga et al., Phys.Rev. A 51 (1995) 5008.
6. J.F. Clauser, M.A. Home, A. Shimony, R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 880; E. Santos, Phys. Rev. A 46 (1992) 3646; P. Kwiat et al., Phys. Rev. A 49 (1994) 3209; E.S. Fry, T. Walther, S. Li, Phys. Rev. A 52 (1995) 4381; Huelga et al., Phys.Rev. A 51 (1995) 5008.
7. J.F. Clauser, M.A. Home, A. Shimony, R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 880; E. Santos, Phys. Rev. A 46 (1992) 3646; P. Kwiat et al., Phys. Rev. A 49 (1994) 3209; E.S. Fry, T. Walther, S. Li, Phys. Rev. A 52 (1995) 4381; Huelga et al., Phys.Rev. A 51 (1995) 5008.
8. J.F. Clauser, M.A. Home, A. Shimony, R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 880; E. Santos, Phys. Rev. A 46 (1992) 3646; P. Kwiat et al., Phys. Rev. A 49 (1994) 3209; E.S. Fry, T. Walther, S. Li, Phys. Rev. A 52 (1995) 4381; Huelga et al., Phys.Rev. A 51 (1995) 5008.
9. ℬ, encoded by a common pseudo-random number generator and a common seed (chosen by the operator).
10. J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 526.
11. M. Steiner, quant-ph/9902014. After completion of this work three articles presenting results similar to Steiner's model, but in the context of Ihv, were brought to our attention (note that contrary to ours, all these models are restricted to spin 1/2 with real coefficients): S. Caser, Phys. Lett. A 92 (1982) 13; D. Home, T.W. Marshall, Phys. Lett. A 113 (1985) 183; J-A. Larsson, Phys. Lett. A 256 (1999) 245.
12. M. Steiner, quant-ph/9902014. After completion of this work three articles presenting results similar to Steiner's model, but in the context of Ihv, were brought to our attention (note that contrary to ours, all these models are restricted to spin 1/2 with real coefficients): S. Caser, Phys. Lett. A 92 (1982) 13; D. Home, T.W. Marshall, Phys. Lett. A 113 (1985) 183; J-A. Larsson, Phys. Lett. A 256 (1999) 245.
13. M. Steiner, quant-ph/9902014. After completion of this work three articles presenting results similar to Steiner's model, but in the context of Ihv, were brought to our attention (note that contrary to ours, all these models are restricted to spin 1/2 with real coefficients): S. Caser, Phys. Lett. A 92 (1982) 13; D. Home, T.W. Marshall, Phys. Lett. A 113 (1985) 183; J-A. Larsson, Phys. Lett. A 256 (1999) 245.
14. M. Steiner, quant-ph/9902014. After completion of this work three articles presenting results similar to Steiner's model, but in the context of Ihv, were brought to our attention (note that contrary to ours, all these models are restricted to spin 1/2 with real coefficients): S. Caser, Phys. Lett. A 92 (1982) 13; D. Home, T.W. Marshall, Phys. Lett. A 113 (1985) 183; J-A. Larsson, Phys. Lett. A 256 (1999) 245.
15. J.S. Bell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38 (1966) 447.
16. J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, R.A. Holt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 880.
17. Note that the detector efficiency includes all possible losses: the η's are the effective efficiencies as they are measured using the technique described in: A.L. Migdall, Physics Today, p. 41, January 1999.
18. A. Garg, D. Mermin, Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987) 3831.
19. Ph.H. Eberhard, Phys. Rev. A 47 (1993) R747.
20. M. Żukowsky, A. Zeilinger, M.A. Horne, A. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 4287.