The effect of challenge method on sensitivity and reactivity to adenosine 5′-monophosphate in subjects with suspected asthma

Chest

Volumn 130, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1448-1453

  Prieto, Luis ^a   Reig, Isabel ^b   Rojas, Rocio ^a   Ferrer, Anna ^a   Domenech, Juan ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DR PESET   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL CLÍNICO SAN CARLOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Adenosine 5 monophosphate; Airway responsiveness; Asthma; Challenge methods; Reactivity

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE; ANTIHISTAMINIC AGENT; BETA 2 ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; BRONCHODILATING AGENT; CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CORTICOSTEROID; CROMOGLYCATE DISODIUM; LEUKOTRIENE RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; LONG ACTING DRUG; NEDOCROMIL SODIUM; THEOPHYLLINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTHMA; BREATHING; BRONCHUS HYPERREACTIVITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DOSIMETER; FEMALE; FORCED EXPIRATORY VOLUME; HUMAN; INHALATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OPEN STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROVOCATION TEST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

EID: 33751222285     PISSN: 00123692     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1378/chest.130.5.1448     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Polosa R, Ng WH, Crimi N, et al. Release of mast-cell-derived mediators after endobronchial adenosine challenge in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 151:624-629
2. Van Schoor J, Joos GF, Kips TC, et al. The effect of ABT-761, a novel 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor, on exercise-and adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997; 155:875-880
3. 20 methacholine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163:1546-1550
4. Van den Toorn LM, Prins JB, Overbeek SE, et al. Adolescents in clinical remission of atopic asthma have elevated exhaled nitric oxide levels and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 162:953-957
5. 20 of methacholine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 164:1127-1132
6. Sterk PJ, Fabbri LM, Quanjer PH, et al. Airway responsiveness: standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults: statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J 1993; 6(suppl):53-83
7. American Thoracic Society. Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161:309-329
8. Joos GF, O'Connor B, Anderson SD, et al. Indirect airway challenges: statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J 2003; 21:1050-1068
9. Orehek J, Gayrard P, Smith AP, et al. Airway responses to carbachol in normal and asthmatic subjects: distinction between bronchial sensitivity and reactivity. Am Rev Respir Dis 1977; 115:937-943
10. Cockcroft DW, Killian DN, Mellon JJA, et al. Bronchial reactivity to inhaled histamine: a method and clinical survey. Clin Allergy 1977; 7:235-243
11. Chai H, Farr RS, Froehlich LA, et al. Standardization of bronchial inhalation challenge procedures. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1975; 56:323-327
12. Phillip SGD, Scott VL, Richards R, et al. Effect of nedocromil sodium and sodium cromoglycate against bronchoconstriction induced by inhaled adenosine 5′-monophosphate. Eur Respir J 1989; 2:210-217
13. 2 adrenergic tolerance in mild asthma. Thorax 1998; 53:110-113
14. Currie GP, Jackson GM, Lee DKC, et al. Allergen sensitization and bronchial hyper-responsiveness to adenosine monophosphate in asthmatic patients. Clin Exp Allergy 2003; 33:1405-1408
15. Prieto L, Bruno L, Gutiérrez V, et al. Airway responsiveness to adenosine 5′-monophosphate and exhaled nitric oxide measurements: predictive vales as markers for reducing the dose of inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic subjects. Chest 2003; 124:1325-1333
16. Van den Berge M, Kerstjens HAM, de Reus DM, et al. Provocation with adenosine 5′-monophosphate, but not methacholine, induces sputum eosinophilia. Clin Exp Allergy 2004; 34:71-76
17. Avital A, Godfrey S, Springer C. Exercise, methacholine, and adenosine 5′-monophosphate challenges in children with asthma: relation to severity of the disease. Pediatr Pulmonol 2000; 30:207-214
18. Prieto L, Gutiérrez V, Liñana J, et al. Bronchoconstriction induced by inhaled adenosine 5′-monophosphate in subjects with allergic rhinitis. Eur Respir J 2001; 17:64-70
19. Prieto L, Gutiérrez V, Uixera S, et al. Effect of cigarette smoking on airway responsiveness to adenosine 5′-monophosphate in subjects with allergic rhinitis. Chest 2003; 123:993-997
20. Ryan G, Dolovich MB, Roberts RS, et al. Standardization of inhalation provocation tests: two techniques of aerosol generation and inhalation compared. Am Rev Respir Dis 1981; 123:195-199
21. Siersted HC, Walker CM, O'Shaughnessy AD, et al. Comparison of two standardized methods of methacholine inhalation challenge in young adults. Eur Respir J 2000; 15:181-184
22. Wubbel C, Asmus MJ, Steven G, et al. Methacholine challenge testing: comparison of the two American Thoracic Society-recommended methods. Chest 2004; 125:453-458
23. Cockcroft DW, Davis BE, Todd DC, et al. Methacholine challenge: comparison of two methods. Chest 2005; 127:839-844
24. Prieto L, Ferrer A, Domenech J, et al. The effect of challenge method on sensitivity, reactivity and maximal response to methacholine. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2006; 97:175-181
25. Allen ND, Davis BE, Hurst TS, et al. Difference between dosimeter and tidal breathing methacholine challenge: contributions of dose and deep inspiration bronchoprotection. Chest 2005; 128:4018-4023
26. American Thoracic Society. Standardization of spirometry, 1987 update. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987; 136:1285-1298
27. Quanjer P. Standardized lung function testing. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 1983; 19(suppl):1-93
28. Prieto L, Marin J. Methacholine inhalation challenge: practical consequences of using duplicate spirograms after each concentration. Ann Allergy 1993; 70:487-490
29. 20: comparison of linear and logarithmic interpolation. Chest 1983; 84:505-506
30. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i:307-310
31. Daxun Z, Rafferty P, Richards R, et al. Airway refractoriness to adenosine 5′-monophosphate after repeated inhalation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989; 83:152-158