Difference between dosimeter and tidal breathing methacholine challenge: Contributions of dose and deep inspiration bronchoprotection

Chest

Volumn 128, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 4018-4023

  Allen, Nathan D ^a   Davis, Beth E ^a   Hurst, Thomas S ^a   Cockcroft, Donald W ^a,b  

^a ROYAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b Department of Respiratory Medicine   (Canada)

Author keywords

Airway responsiveness; Deep inspiration; Dosimeter; Methacholine; Tidal breathing method

Indexed keywords

METHACHOLINE;

ADULT; AIRWAY DYNAMICS; ARTICLE; ASTHMA; BREATHING DISORDER; BRONCHUS HYPERREACTIVITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DOSE RESPONSE; DOSIMETER; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHALATION TEST; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROVOCATION TEST; TIDAL BREATHING METHACHOLINE TEST; TIDAL VOLUME;

EID: 30344474323     PISSN: 00123692     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1378/chest.128.6.4018     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Crapo RO, Casaburi R, Coates AL, et al. Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161:309-329
2. Cockcroft DW, Killian DN, Mellon JJA, et al. Bronchial reactivity to inhaled histamine: a method and clinical survey. Clin Allergy 1977; 7:235-243
3. Cockcroft DW, Davis BE, Todd DC, et al. Methacholine challenge: comparison of two methods. Chest 2005; 127:839-844
4. Skloot G, Permutt S, Togias A. Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: a problem of limited smooth muscle relaxation with inspiration. J Clin Invest 1995; 96:2393-2403
5. Scichilone N, Permutt S, Togias A. The lack of the bronchoprotective and not the bronchodilatory ability of deep inspiration is associated with airway hyperresponsiveness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163:413-419
6. Brusasco V, Crimi E, Barisione G, et al. Airway responsiveness to methacholine: effects of deep inhalations and airway inflammation. J Appl Physiol 1999; 87:567-573
7. 1. Chest 2000; 117:881-883
8. 20 extrapolation. Chest 1998; 114:1796-1797
9. 20: comparison of linear and logarithmic interpolation. Chest 1983; 84:505-506
10. 20. Chest 2002; 122:1499-1500
11. Bennett JB, Davies RJ. A comparison of histamine and methacholine bronchial challenges using the DeVilbiss 646 nebulizer and the Rosenthal-French dosimeter. Br J Dis Chest 1987; 81:252-259
12. Josephs LK, Gregg I, Mullee MA, et al. Nonspecific bronchial reactivity and its relationship to the clinical expression of asthma: a longitudinal study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989; 140:350-357
13. Avital A, Noviski N, Bar-Yishay E, et al. Nonspecific bronchial reactivity in asthmatic children depends on severity but not on age. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991; 144:36-38
14. Fredberg JJ. Frozen objects: small airways, big breaths, and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000; 106:615-624
15. Ford LE, Seow CY, Pratusevich VR. Plasticity in smooth muscle. a hypothesis. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1994; 72:1320-1324
16. Seow CY, Pratusevich VR, Ford LR. Series-to-parallel transition in the filament lattice of airway smooth muscle. J Appl Physiol 2000; 89:869-876
17. Kuo KH, Herrera AM, Wang L, et al. Structure-function correlation in airway smooth muscle adapted to different lengths. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2003; 285:C384-C390
18. Wang L, Pare PD, Seow CY. Effects of length oscillation on the subsequent force development in swine tracheal smooth muscle. J Appl Physiol 2000; 88:2246-2250
19. Mehta D, Gunst SJ. Actin polymerization stimulated by contractile activation regulates force development in canine tracheal smooth muscle. J Physiol 1999; 519:829-840
20. Wang L, Pare PD. Deep inspiration and airway smooth muscle adaptation to length change. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2003; 137-169-78
21. Salome CM, Thorpe CW, Diba C, et al. Airway re-narrowing following deep inspiration in asthmatic and nonasthmatic subjects. Eur Respir J 2003; 22:62-68
22. Ma X, Cheng Z, Kong H, et al. Changes in biophysical and biochemical properties of single bronchial smooth muscle cells from asthmatic subjects. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2002; 283:L1181-L1189
23. Ryan G, Dolovich MB, Roberts RS, et al. Standardization of inhalation provocation tests: two techniques of aerosol generation and inhalation compared. Am Rev Respir Dis 1981; 123:195-199
24. Wubbel C, Asmus MJ, Stevens G, et al. Methacholine challenge testing: comparison of the two American Thoracic Society-recommended methods. Chest 2004; 125:453-458
25. Juniper EF, Hargreave FE. Airway responsiveness assessed by aerosol inhalation tests: variability in results due to unexpected differences between calibrated nebulizers. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1986; 77:171
26. Simard B, Turcotte H, Cockcroft DW, et al. Deep inspiration avoidance and methacholine response in normal subjects and patients with asthma. Chest 2005; 127:135-142
27. Todd DC, Davis BE, Hurst TS, et al. Dosimeter methacholine challenge: comparison of maximal versus submaximal inhalations. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 114:517-519