Bowel preparation for CT-colonography: Comparison of two different cleansing protocols

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 460-464

  Juchems, Markus S ^a   Hoffmann, Martin H K ^a   Schmidt, Stefan A ^b   Apostel, Anna ^a   Brambs, Hans Juergen ^a   Aschoff, Andrik J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ULM   (Germany)

^b Karl Olga Krankenhaus   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bowel preparation; CT; CT colonography

Indexed keywords

BODY FLUIDS; GENETIC ENGINEERING; PATIENT TREATMENT; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;

BOWEL PREPARATION; CLEANSING PROTOCOLS; CT-COLONOGRAPHY; MULTI-PLANAR-REFORMATTED (MPR) IMAGES;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

BISACODYL; GOLYTELY; LAXATIVE; MACROGOL; NULYTELY; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASCENDING COLON; BODY POSTURE; COLON DILATATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT POSITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM; SIGMOID; SUPINE POSITION;

BISACODYL; CATHARTICS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; ELECTROLYTES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; PRONE POSITION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOLUTIONS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SUPINE POSITION; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS;

EID: 33751164205     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Pickhardt P.J., Choi J.R., Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349 (2003) 2191-2200
2. Fenlon H.M., Nunes D.P., Schroy III P.C., et al. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 341 (1999) 1496-1503
3. Neri E., Giusti P., Battolla L., et al. Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 223 (2002) 615-619
4. Cotton P.B., Durkalski V.L., Pineau B.C., et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291 (2004) 1713-1719
5. Rockey D.C., Paulson E., Niedzwiecki D., et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365 (2005) 305-311
6. Hoppe H., Quattropani C., Spreng A., et al. Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol 182 (2004) 1151-1158
7. Macari M., Milano A., Lavelle M., Berman P., and Megibow A.J. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. Am J Roentgenol 174 (2000) 1543-1549
8. Vos F.M., van Gelder R.E., Serlie I.W., et al. Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology 228 (2003) 878-885
9. Macari M., Lavelle M., Pedrosa I., et al. Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology 218 (2001) 274-277
10. Ginnerup Pedersen B., Moller Christiansen T.E., Viborg Mortensen F., Christensen H., and Laurberg S. Bowel cleansing methods prior to CT colonography. Acta Radiol 43 (2002) 306-311
11. Zalis M.E., Perumpillichira J., Del Frate C., and Hahn P.F. CT colonography: digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction initial observations. Radiology 226 (2003) 911-917
12. Lefere P., Gryspeerdt S., Marrannes J., Baekelandt M., and Van Holsbeeck B. CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium. Am J Roentgenol 184 (2005) 1836-1842
13. Lefere P.A., Gryspeerdt S.S., Dewyspelaere J., Baekelandt M., and Van Holsbeeck B.G. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 224 (2002) 393-403
14. Bielen D., Thomeer M., Vanbeckevoort D., et al. Dry preparation for virtual CT colonography with fecal tagging using water-soluble contrast medium: initial results. Eur Radiol 13 (2003) 453-458
15. Lefere P., Gryspeerdt S., Baekelandt M., and Van Holsbeeck B. Laxative-free CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 183 (2004) 945-948
16. Ristvedt S.L., McFarland E.G., Weinstock L.B., and Thyssen E.P. Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 98 (2003) 578-585
17. Svensson M.H., Svensson E., Lasson A., and Hellstrom M. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 222 (2002) 337-345
18. Juchems M.S., Ehmann J., Brambs H.-J., and Aschoff A.J. A retrospective evaluation of patient acceptance of CT colonography ("virtual colonoscopy") in comparison to conventional colonoscopy in an average risk screening population. Acta Radiol 46 (2005) 664-670
19. Luccichenti G., Cademartiri F., Nogueira L., et al. Pitfalls and feasibility of a protocol of virtual colonography designed for the screening of colo-rectal pre-cancerous lesions. Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense 76 (2005) 20-27
20. Yee J., Kumar N.N., Hung R.K., et al. Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. Radiology 226 (2003) 653-661
21. Chen S.C., Lu D.S., Hecht J.R., and Kadell B.M. CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. Am J Roentgenol 172 (1999) 595-599
22. Ell C., Fischbach W., Keller R., et al. A randomized, blinded, prospective trial to compare the safety and efficacy of three bowel-cleansing solutions for colonoscopy (HSG-01*). Endoscopy 35 (2003) 300-304
23. Forbes G.M., Edwards J.T., Foster N.M., Wood C.J., and Mendelson R.M. Randomized single blind trial of two low-volume bowel preparations for screening computed tomographic colonography. Abdom Imaging 30 (2005) 48-52