Ameboid cell motility: A model and inverse problem, with an application to live cell imaging data

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 244, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 169-179

  Coskun, Huseyin ^a   Li, Yi ^b,c   Mackey, Michael A ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c HUNAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d IA United States   (United States)

Author keywords

Ameboid movement; Cancer cell; Cell motility; Inverse problem

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; CYTOPLASM; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MOTILITY; NEWTONIAN FLUID; SIMULATION; TUMOR;

ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL MOTILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPLASM; CYTOSKELETON; GLIOBLASTOMA; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMAGING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISCOELASTICITY;

CELL MEMBRANE; CELL MOVEMENT; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CYTOSKELETON; ELASTICITY; GLIOBLASTOMA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; TUMOR CELLS, CULTURED; VISCOSITY;

EID: 33751160032     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.07.025     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abercrombie M. The Croonian lecture, 1978: the crawling movement of metazoan cells. Proc. R. Soc. London B: Biol. Sci. 207 (1980) 129-147
2. Alberts B., Johnson A., Lewis J., Raff M., Roberts K., and Walter P. Molecular Biology of the Cell (2002), Garland, New York
3. Alt W., and Dembo M. Cytoplasm dynamics and cell motion: two-phase flow models. Math. Biosci. 156 (1999) 207-228 (special issue entitled epidemiology, cellular automata, and evolution)
4. Bausch A.R., Moller W., and Sackmann E. Measurement of local viscoelasticity and forces in living cells by magnetic tweezers. Biophys. J. 76 (1999) 573-579
5. Bottino D., Mogilner A., Roberts T., Stewart M., and Oster G. How nematode sperm crawl. J. Cell Sci. 115 (2002) 367-384
6. Bray D. Cell Movements (2001), Garland, New York
7. Caille N., Thoumine O., Tardy Y., and Meister J.J. Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. J. Biomech. 35 2 (2002) 177-188
8. Chicurel M. Cell migration research is on the move. Science 295 (2002) 606-609
9. Coskun, H., 2006a. A continuum model with free boundary formulation and the inverse problem for ameboid cell motility. Preprint.
10. Coskun, H., 2006b. Mathematical models for cell motility and model-based inverse problems. PhD Thesis, Department of Mathematics, University of Iowa.
11. Cox E., and Huttenlocher A. Regulation of integrin-mediated adhesion during cell migration. Microsc. Res. Tech. 43 (1998) 412-419
12. Defilippi P., Olivo C., Venturino M., Dolce L., Silengo L., and Tarone G. Actin cytoskeleton organization in response to integrin-mediated adhesion. Microsc. Res. Tech. 47 (1999) 67-78
13. DiMilla P.A., Barbee K., and Lauffenburger D.A. Mathematical model for the effects of adhesion and mechanics on cell migration speed. Biophys. J. 60 (1991) 15-37
14. Dong C., and Skalak R. Leukocyte deformability: finite-element modeling of large viscoelastic deformation. J. Theor. Biol. 158 (1992) 173-193
15. Feneberg W., and Westphal M. Dictyostelium cells' cytoplasm as an active viscoplastic body. Eur. Biophys. J. 30 (2001) 284-294
16. Gracheva M.E., and Othmer H.G. A continuum model of motility in ameboid cells. Bull. Math. Biol. 66 (2004) 167-193
17. Heidemann S.R., Kaech S., Buxbaum R.E., and Matus A. Direct observations of the mechanical behaviors of the cytoskeleton in living fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 145 (1999) 109-122
18. Ianzini F., and Mackey M.A. Development of the large scale digital cell analysis system. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 99 (2002) 289-293
19. Ianzini, F., Bresnahan, L., Wang, L., Anderson, K., Mackey, M.A., 2002. The Large Scale Digital Cell Analysis System and its use in the quantitative analysis of cell populations. In: Dittmar, A., Beebe, E. (Eds.), Second Annual International IEEE-EMB Special Topic Conference on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology (Madison, WI, 2002), IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 470-475.
20. Karcher H., Lammerding J., Huang H., Lee R.T., Kamm R.D., and Kaazempur-Mofrad M.R. A three-dimensional viscoelastic model for cell deformation with experimental verification. Biophys. J. 85 (2003) 3336-3349
21. Kaverina I., Krylyshkina O., and Small J.V. Regulation of substrate adhesion dynamics during cell motility. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 34 (2002) 746-761
22. Lauffenburger D., and Horwitz A. Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell 84 (1996) 359-369
23. MacKintosh F.C. Theoretical models of viscoelasticity of actin solutions and the actin cortex. Biol. Bull. 194 (1998) 351-353
24. Marella S.V., and Udaykumar H.S. Computational analysis of the deformability of leukocytes modeled with viscous and elastic structural components. Phys. Fluids 16 2 (2004) 244-264
25. McGarry J.G., Klein-Nulend J., Mullender M.G., and Prendergast P.J. A comparison of strain and fluid shear stress in stimulating bone cell responses-a computational and experimental study. FASEB J. 18 15 (2004)
26. Mitchison T.J., and Cramer L.P. Actin-based cell motility and cell locomotion. Cell 84 (1996) 371-379
27. Mogilner A., and Edelstein-Keshet L. Regulation of actin dynamics in rapidly moving cells: a quantitative analysis. Biophys. J. 83 (2002) 1237-1258
28. Mogilner A., and Verzi D.W. A simple 1-D physical model for the crawling nematode sperm cell. J. Stat. Phys. 110 (2003) 1169-1189
29. Mogilner, A., Marland, E., Bottino, D., 2000. A minimal model of locomotion applied to the steady gliding movement of fish keratocyte cells. In: Maini, P.K., Othmer, H.G. (Eds.), Mathematical Models for Biological Pattern Formation, The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications, Frontiers in Application of Mathematics, vol. 121. Springer, New York, pp. 269-294.
30. Munevar S., Wang Y., and Dembo M. Traction force microscopy of migrating normal and H-ras transformed 3T3 fibroblasts. Biophys. J. 80 (2001) 1744-1757
31. Palecek S.P., Schmidt C.E., Lauffenburger D.A., and Horwitz A.F. Integrin dynamics on the tail region of migrating fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 109 Part 5 (1996) 941-952
32. Palecek S.P., Loftus J.C., Ginsberg M.H., Lauffenburger D.A., and Horwitz A.F. Integrin-ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cell-substratum adhesiveness. Nature 385 (1997) 537-540
33. Palsson E., and Othmer H.G. A model for individual and collective cell movement in Dictyostelium discoideum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97 (2000) 10448-10453
34. Schmid-Schönbein G., Kosawada T., Skalak R., and Chien S. Membrane model of endothelial cells and leukocytes: a proposal for the origin of a cortical stress. J. Biomech. Eng. 117 (1995) 171-178
35. Small J.V. Microfilament-based motility in non-muscle cells. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1 (1989) 75-79
36. Sultan C., Stamenovic D., and Ingber D.E. A computational tensegrity model predicts dynamic rheological behaviors in living cells. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32 4 (2004) 520-530
37. Theriot J., and Mitchison T. Actin microfilament dynamics in locomoting cells. Nature 352 (1991) 126-131
38. Verkhovsky A.B., Svitkina T.M., and Borisy G.G. Self-polarization and directional motility of cytoplasm. Curr. Biol. 9 (1999) 11-20
39. Yanai M., Butler J.P., Suzuki T., Kanda A., Kurachi M., Tashiro H., and Sasaki H. Intracellular elasticity and viscosity in the body, leading, and trailing regions of locomoting neutrophils. Am. J. Physiol. 277 (1999) C432-C440
40. Yanai M., Butler J.P., Suzuki T., Sasaki H., and Higuchi H. Regional rheological differences in locomoting neutrophils. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 287 (2004) C603-C611
41. Yeung A., and Evans E. Cortical shell-liquid core model for passive flow of liquid-like spherical cells into micropipets. Biophys. J. 56 (1989) 139-149