A clinical evaluation of proview pressure phosphene tonometry in children

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 83, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 817-822

  Chung, Ida ^a   Bartolone, Amelia ^a   Swanson, William H ^a   Thau, Andrea P ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Intraocular pressure; Pediatric population; Pressure phosphene tonometry; Proview

Indexed keywords

DISPLAY DEVICES; MERCURY (METAL); PATIENT TREATMENT; PEDIATRICS;

INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; PEDIATRIC POPULATION; PRESSURE PHOSPHENE TONOMETRY; PROVIEW;

OPHTHALMOLOGY;

EYE DROPS; MERCURY;

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MONITOR; NORMAL HUMAN; PEDIATRICS; PRESSURE PHOSPHENE TONOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TONOMETER; TONOMETRY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; PHOSPHENES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 33751052080     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000239101.75107.3c     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Moller HU. Milestones and normative data. In: Taylor D, ed. Paediatric Ophthalmology. Malden: Blackwell Science Ltd, 1997:42-56.
2. Bordon AF, Katsumi O, Hirose T. Tonometry in pediatric patients: a comparative study among Tono-pen, Perkins, and Schiotz tonometers. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1995;32:373-7.
3. Brindley GS. The site of electrical excitation of the human eye. J Physiol 1955;127:189-200.
4. Lipetz LE. The x-ray and radium phosphenes. Br J Ophthalmol 1955;39:577-98.
5. Grusser OJ, Grusser-Cornehls U, Kusel R, Przybyszewski AW. Responses of retinal ganglion cells to eyeball deformation: a neurophysiological basis for 'pressure phosphenes.' Vision Res 1989;29:181-94.
6. Fresco BB. A new tonometer - the pressure phosphene tonometer: clinical comparison with Goldman tonometry. Ophthalmology 1998;105:2123-6.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
8. Li J, Herndon LW, Asrani SG, Stinnett S, Allingham RR. Clinical comparison of the Proview eye pressure monitor with the Goldmann applanation tonometer and the Tonopen. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1117-21.
9. Danesh-Meyer HV, Niederer R, Gaskin BJ, Gamble G. Comparison of the Proview pressure phosphene tonometer performed by the patient and examiner with the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004;32:29-32.
10. Alvarez TL, Gollance SA, Thomas GA, Greene RJ, Marchetto PM, Moore EJ, Realini T, Liebmann JM, Ritch R, Lama P, Fechtner RD. The Proview phosphene tonometer fails to measure ocular pressure accurately in clinical practice. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1077-85.
11. Lam DS, Leung DY, Chiu TY, Fan DS, Cheung EY, Wong TY, Lai JS, Tham CC. Pressure phosphene self-tonometry: a comparison with Goldmann tonometry in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:3131-6.
12. Lievens CW, Wroten C, Menard K, Jernigan P, Connor CG. Using the Proview eye pressure monitor in a pediatric population. J Optom Vis Devel 2003;34:71-4.
13. Chew GS, Sanderson GF, Molteno AC. The pressure phosphene tonometer - a clinical evaluation. Eye 2005;19:683-5.
14. Brigatti L, Maguluri S. Reproducibility of self-measured intraocular pressure with the phosphene tonometer in patients with ocular hypertension and early to advanced glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2005;14:36-9.
15. Eisenberg DL, Sherman BG, McKeown CA, Schuman JS. Tonometry in adults and children. A manometric evaluation of pneumatonometry, applanation, and TonoPen in vitro and in vivo. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1173-81.
16. Herse P, Hans A, Hall J, Langejans J, Markoulli M. The Proview Eye Pressure Monitor: influence of clinical factors on accuracy and agreement with the Goldmann tonometer. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2005;25:416-20.