Comparison of the Proview pressure phosphene tonometer performed by the patient and examiner with the Goldmann applanation tonometer

Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 29-32

  Danesh Meyer, Helen V ^a   Niederer, Rachel ^a   Gaskin, Brent J ^a   Gamble, Greg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Goldmann; Intraocular pressure; Pressure phosphene tonometry; Proview; Self assessment tonometry

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE ABNORMALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCHOOL CHILD; SELF EXAMINATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TONOMETER; TONOMETRY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; PHOSPHENES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF CARE;

EID: 1542715339     PISSN: 14426404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2004.00753.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. David R, Zangwill L, Briscoe D, Dagan M, Yagev R, Yassur Y. Diurnal intraocular pressure variations: An analysis of 690 diurnal curves. B J Ophthalmol 1992; 76: 280-83.
2. Liu JHK, Kripke DF, Twa MD et al. Twenty-four-hour pattern of intraocular pressure in the aging population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 29 12-17.
3. Asrani S, Zeimer R, Wilensky J, Gieser D, Vitale S, Lindenmuth K. Large diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure are an independent risk factor in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2000; 9: 134-42.
4. Yablonski ME, Asamoto A. Hypothesis concerning the pathophysiology of optic nerve damage in open angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 1993; 2: 119-27.
5. Kothy P, Vargha P, Hollo G. Ocuton-S self tonometry vs. Goldmann tonometry: A diurnal comparison study. Acta Ophthalmol 2001; 79: 294-7.
6. Wilensky JT, Gieser DK, Mori MT, Langenberg PW, Zeimer RC. Self -tonometry to manage patients with glaucoma and apparently controlled intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthalmol 1987; 105: 1072-5.
7. Fresco BB. A new tonometer: The pressure phosphene tonometer. Clinical comparison with Goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 2123-6.
8. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-10.
9. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing two methods of clinical measurement: A personal history. Int J Epidemiol 1995; 24 (Suppl. 1): S7-S14.
10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error. Br Med J 1996; 313: 744.
11. Wessels IF, Oh Y. Tonometer utilization, accuracy, and calibration under field conditions. Arch Ophthalmol 1990; 108: 1709-12.
12. Kao SF, Lichter PR, Bergstrom TJ, Rowe S, Musch DC. Clinical comparison of the Oculab tono-pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Ophthalmology 1987; 94: 1541-4.
13. Frenckel REP, Hong YJ, Shin DH. Comparison of the Tono-pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Arch Ophthalmol 1988; 106: 750-53.
14. Colotto A, Falsini B, Salgarello T et al. Transiently raised intraocular pressure reveals pattern electrogram losses in ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 3 7: 2663-70.