Documentation on the anesthetic record: Correlation with clinically important variables

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 53, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1086-1091

  Tessler, Michael J ^a   Tsiodras, Athanasios ^a   Kardash, Kenneth J ^a   Shrier, Ian ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY; ALLERGY; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT VARIABLE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VITAL SIGN;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHETICS; DATA COLLECTION; DOCUMENTATION; DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY; HOSPITALS, TEACHING; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PREOPERATIVE CARE;

EID: 33751038417     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03022875     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Mackay P. The anaesthetic record - an essential monitor. Anaesth Intensive Care 1988; 16: 25-7.
2. Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society. Guidelines to the practice of anesthesia. Revised 2005. Supplement to the Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. Available from URL; http:www.cas.ca/members/sign_in/ guidelines/practice_of_anesthesia.
3. Devitt JH, Rapanos T, Kurrek M, Cohen MM, Shaw M. The anesthetic record: accuracy and completeness. Can J Anesth 1999: 46; 122-8.
4. Kluger MT, Tham EJ, Coleman NA, Runciman WB, Bullock MF. Inadequate pre-operative evaluation and preparation: a review of 197 reports from the Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Anaesthesia 2000: 55; 1173-8.
5. Roach VJ, Lau TK, Kee WD, Wormald PJ. Perioperative documentation: are we doing enough? Aust NZ Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 38: 166-9.
6. Rahman K, Jenkins JG. Failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics: no more frequent but still managed badly. Anaesthesia. 2005; 60: 168-71.
7. Rowe L, Galletly DC, Henderson RS. Accuracy of text entries within a manually compiled anaesthetic record. Br J Anaesth 1992; 68: 381-7.
8. Ausset S, Bouaziz H, Brosseau M, Kinirons B, Benbamou D. Improvement of information gained from the pre-anaesthetic visit through a quality-assurance programme. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 280-3.
9. Marco AP, Buchman D, Lancz C. Influence of form structure on the anesthesia preoperative evaluation. J Clin Anesth 2003; 15: 411-7.
10. Reich DL, Wood RK Jr, Mattar R, et al. Arterial blood pressure and heart rate discrepancies between hand-written and computerized anesthesia records. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 612-6.
11. Hollenberg JP, Pirraglia PA, Williams-Russo P, et al. Computerized data collection in the operating room during coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison to the hand-written anesthesia record. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1997; 11: 545-51.
12. Todd MM, Burmeister LF. Principles of successful sample surveys (Editorial). Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 1251-2.