Perioperative documentation: Are we doing enough?

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 166-169

  Roach, Vijay J ^a   Lau, T K ^a   Ngan Kee, Warwick D ^a   Wormald, Peter J ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PERITONEUM ADHESION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCAR;

EID: 0031837153     PISSN: 00048666     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1998.tb02993.x     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. College Policy Document P6. 1996 Minimum Requirements for the Anaesthesia Record.
2. Litigation in Obstetrics and Gynaecology; Proceedings of the Fourteenth Study Group of the Royal College of Obstetrician and Gynaecologists. Chamberlain G V P, Orr C J P, Sharp (eds) The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists London, United Kingdom.
3. Australian Medical Association Code of Ethics, July, 1992.
4. Taylor J L. Medical Malpractice. John Wright and Sons, Bristol, United Kingdom. 1980.
5. Campion F. Good medical records can be strongest malpractice defense. In Grand Rounds on Medical Malpractice. American Medical Association 1990.