Robotics and clinical research: Collaborating to expand the evidence base for rehabilitation

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2006, Pages

  Huang, Grant D ^a,b   Peduzzi, Peter ^c,d   Kerkovich, Danielle ^e  

^a VA Cooperative Studies Program   (United States)

^b UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^c VA Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center   (United States)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e VA Health Services Research and Development Service   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; BIOMEDICINE; BODY WEIGHT; BONE DISEASE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; IMPLANT; LIMB AMPUTATION; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; MUSCLE DISEASE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT MOBILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TISSUE REGENERATION; TRAINING; TREADMILL; VETERAN;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; REHABILITATION; ROBOTICS; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS;

EID: 33751032569     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 07487711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2006.05.0042     Document Type: Editorial

References (15)

1. Voelker R. Rehabilitation medicine welcomes a robotic revolution. JAMA. 2005;294(10):1191-95.
2. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Emken JL, Cramer SC. Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2004;6:497-525.
3. Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Ferraro M, Fasoli S, Palazzolo J, Rohrer B, Edelstein L, Hogan N. Robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation: From evidence-based to science-based rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2002;8(4):54-70.
4. Newsam CJ, Baker LL. Effect of an electric stimulation facilitation program on quadriceps motor unit recruitment after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(12):2040-45.
5. Loeb GE, Peck RA, Moore WH, Hood K. BION system for distributed neural prosthetic interfaces. Med Eng Phys. 2001;23(1):9-18.
6. Glasgow RE, Magid DJ, Beck A, Ritzwoller D, Estabrooks PA. Practical clinical trials for translating research to practice: Design and measurement recommendations. Med Care. 2005;43(6):551-57.
7. Weinrich M, Stuart M, Hoyer T. Rules for rehabilitation: An agenda for research. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19(2):72-83.
8. Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: Increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA. 2003;290(12):1624-32.
9. Duncan PW, Lai SM, Tyler D, Perera S, Reker DM, Studenski S. Evaluation of proxy responses to the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke. 2002;33(11):2593-99.
10. Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S. Persistent consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke. 2002;33(7):1840-44.
11. Hogan N. Impedance control: An approach to manipulation: Part I - Theory. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 1985;107(1):1-7.
12. Hogan N. Impedance control: An approach to manipulation: Part II - Implementation. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 1985;107(1):8-16.
13. Hogan N. Impedance control: An approach to manipulation: Part III - Applications. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 1985;107(1):17-24.
14. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? Curr Opin Neurol. 2001;14(6):745-52.
15. Fuhrer MJ. Conducting multiple-site clinical trials in medical rehabilitation research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(11):823-31.