Prioritization of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems success measures: Viewpoints of two organizational stakeholder groups

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 1554-1560

  Ifinedo, Princely ^a   Nahar, Nazmun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

ERP; ERP systems success; Evaluation; Functional or middle managers; Measures; Prioritization; Stakeholders; Top management

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DATABASE SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; RELIABILITY THEORY; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ERP SYSTEMS SUCCESS; MIDDLE MANAGERS; PRIORITIZATION; STAKEHOLDERS;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING;

EID: 33751024633     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (61)

1. Abdinnour-Helm, S., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., and Lengnick-Hall, C. A. Pre-implementation attitudes and organizational readiness for implementing an Enterprise Resource Planning system, EJOR, 146, (2003), 258-273
2. Anthony, R. N. Planning and Control Systems: A Framework of Analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, 1965.
3. Ballantine, J., Bonner, M., Levy, M., Martin, A., Munro, I., and Powell, P. L. Developing a 3-D model of information systems success. In Information Systems Success, Edward Garrity and G. Lawrence Sanders (Eds.), Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 1997.
4. Brancheau, J., and Wetherbe, J. Key issues in information systems management. MISQ, 11, 1 (1987), 23-45.
5. Brynjolfsson, E., and Hitt, L. "Paradox lost" firm level evidence on the return of information systems spending, Mgt. Sci., 42, 4 (1996), 541-558.
6. Cameron, K.S. Effectiveness as paradox: consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Mgt. Sci., 32, 5 (1986), 539-553.
7. Clouther, S. Industrial ERP Market Turns Positive after Years of Declining Revenues, ARC Advisory Group], http://www.arcwire.com. Accessed (6/7/2005).
8. Davenport, T. H. Saving IT's soul: human-centered information management. HBR, (April, 1994), 119-131.
9. Davenport, T. Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. HBR, 76, 4 (1998), 121-131.
10. DeLone, W. H., and McLean, E. R. Information systems success: the quest for the dependable variable. ISR, 3, 1 (1992), 60-95.
11. Doll, W. J., and Torkzadeh, G. The measure of end-user computing satisfaction. MISQ, 12, 2 (1988), 259-274.
12. Esteves, J., and Pastor. J. Enterprise resource planning systems research: An annotated bibliography. CAIS, 7, 8 (2001), 1-52.
13. Everdingen, Y., Hillegersberg, J., and Waarts, E. ERP adoption by European midsize companies. CACM, 43, 4 (2000), 27-31.
14. Fraser, C., and Zarkada-Fraser, A. Investigating the effectiveness of managers through an analysis of stakeholder perceptions. Journal of Mgt. Dev., 22, 9 (2003), 762-783.
15. Freeman, R. E. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston, MA, 1984.
16. Gable, G. G., Sedera, D., and Chan T. Measuring enterprise systems success: A preliminary model. In Proceedings of the 9th. AMCIS, Tampa, Florida, 2003, 576-591.
17. Grover, V., Jeong, S. R., and Segars, A. H. Information systems effectiveness: The construct space and patterns of application, I & M, 31, (1996), 177-191.
18. Gupta, A. A stakeholder analysis approach for interorganizational systems. IMDS, 95, 6 (1995) 3-7.
19. Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Thatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice-Hall International, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1998.
20. Hallikainen, P., Laukkanen, S., and Sarpola, S. Reasons for ERP acquisition. In Proceedings of the 6th. (ICEIS), Porto, Portugal, 2004.
21. Hofstede, G. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Sage Publications, NY, 2001.
22. Ifinedo, P. Do organisational-technological contingency factors influence the perception of ERP systems success? An exploratory study in the Baltic-Nordic region of Europe, In Proceedings of the IBIMA Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, 2005, 427-437.
23. Ifinedo, P. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems success measurement: An extended model, In Proceedings of the 8th. (ICEIS), Paphos, Cyprus, 2006, Forthcoming.
24. Igbaria, M. End-user computing effectiveness: A structural equation model. Omega, 18, 6 (1990), 637-652.
25. Keen, P. MIS Research: Reference disciplines and a cumulative tradition. In Proceedings of the ICIS, 1980, Philadelphia, PA.
26. Ko, D., Kirsch, J. L., and King, W. R. Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations. MISQ, 29, 1 (2005), 59-85.
27. Laukkanen, S., Sarpola, S, and Hallikainen, P. ERP system adoption Does size matter? In Proceeding of the 38HICSS, Hawaii, 1-9, 2005.
28. Lederer, A. L., and Mendelow, A. L. Convincing top management of the strategic potential of information systems, MISQ, 12, 4 (1988), 525-534.
29. Markus, L., and Tanis, C. The Enterprise systems experience-from adoption to Success. In R.W. Zmud (Ed.) Framing the domains of IT research: Glimpsing the fFuture Through the Past. Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Inc, Cincinnati, OH, 2000, 173-207.
30. Markus, M. L., Tanis, C., and Fenema, P. C. Multisite ERP Implementation. CACM, 43, 4 (2000), 42-46.
31. Martin, M. An ERP Strategy, Fortune, 2 (February 1998), 95-97.
32. Mockaitis, A. The influence of national cultural values on management attitudes: A comparative study across three countries. Ph.D Thesis, Management and Administration, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania, 2002.
33. Moynihan, T. What chief executives and senior managers want from their IT departments, MISQ, 14, 1 (1995), 15-26.
34. Myers, B.L., Kappelman, L.A., and Prybutok, V.R. A case for including work group productivity measures in a comprehensive IS assessment model. In Proceedings of the 27th. Decision Sciences Institute, 1996, 756-758.
35. Myers, B. L., Kappelman, L. A., and Prybutok, V. R. A comprehensive model for assessing the quality and productivity of the information systems function: Toward a theory for information systems assessment. IRM Journal, 10, 1, (1997), 6-25.
36. Nahar, N., and Savolainen, V. IT-enabled international promotion of technology transfer in the enterprise resource planning space. Studies in Informatics and Control, 9, 3 (2000), 233-251
37. Nelson, K. G., and Somers, T. M. Exploring ERP success from an end-user perspective. In Proceedings of the 7th. AMCIS, Florida, USA, 2001.
38. Nissinen, M. The Baltics as a Business Location for Information Technology and Electronics Industries. VTT Research Notes 2166, Helsinki: Edita Prima Oy, 2002.
39. Nunnally, J. C. Psychometric Theory, (2nd. Edn.). McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1978.
40. Parker, C. P., Dipboye, R. L., and Jackson, S. L. Perceptions of organizational politics: An investigation of antecedents and consequences. Journal of Mgt., 21, 5 (1995), 891-912.
41. Pfeffer, J. Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1992.
42. Pijpers, G., G., M., Bemelmans, T. M. A., Heemstra, F. J., and van Montfort, K, A. G. M. Senior executives' use of information technology, IST, 43, (2001), 959-971.
43. Pouloudi, A. and Whitley, E. A. Stakeholder identification in the inter-organizational systems: gaining insights for the drug use management systems. EJIS, 6, (1997), 1-14.
44. Rao, S. S. Enterprise resource planning: Business needs and technologies, IMDS, 100, 2 (2000), 81-88.
45. Reilly, K. ERP Market Report Showing Overall Growth of 14% in 2004. www.amrresearch.com/content/Display. Accessed (15/10/2005).
46. Rousseau, D. M. Characteristics of departments, positions, and individuals: contexts for attitudes and behavior. ASQ, 21, 4 (1978), 598-616.
47. Sammon, D., Adam, F., and Carton, F. Benefit realisation through ERP: The re-emergence of data warehousing. EJISE, 6, 2 (2003), 155-164.
48. Sedera, D., Gable G., and Chan T., Measuring enterprise systems success: A preliminary model. In Proceedings of the 9th. AMCIS, Tampa, Florida, 2003.
49. Sedera, D., Gable G., and Chan T. Knowledge management for ERP success, In Proceeding of the 7th. PACIS, Adelaide, Australia, 2003.
50. Seddon, P. B. A re-specification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. ISR, 18, 3 (1997), 240-253.
51. Seeley, M., and Targett, D. Patterns of senior executives' personal use of computers, I & M, 35, (1999), 315-330.
52. Schein, E. H. The role of the CEO in the management of change: The case of information technology. Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA. 1992.
53. Shang, S., and Seddon, P. B. Assessing and managing the benefits of enterprise systems: the business manager's perspective, ISJ, 12, (2002), 271-299.
54. Singletary, L, Pawlowski, S., and Watson, E. What is applications integration? Understanding the perspectives of managers, IT professionals, and End Users. In Proceedings of the 9th. AMCIS, Tampa, Florida, 2003.
55. Somers, T. M., and Nelson, K. G. A taxonomy of players and activities across the ERP project life cycle. I & M, 41, (2004), 257-278.
56. Strong, D. M., Volkoff, O., and Elmes, M. B. ERP systems and the paradox of control. In Proc. of 9th. AMCIS, Tampa, Florida, 2003.
57. Tan, C. W., and Pan, S. L. ERP Success: The search for a comprehensive framework", In Proceedings of the 8th. AMCIS, Dallas, Texas, 2002.
58. Teo, T.S. H., and Ang, J. S. K. Critical success factors in the alignment of IS plans with business plans, IJIM, 19, (1999), 173-185
59. Weiss, J. A., Gruber, J. E., and Carver, R. H. Reflections on value: policy makers evaluate Federal Information Systems, PAR, 46, (November 1986), 497-505.
60. Wilkes, R., and Dickson, G. Assessment of the information systems organizations: An empirical investigation of assessor perspectives. In Proceedings of the 8th, ICIS, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987, 428-439.
61. World Economic Forum [WEF]. The Networked Readiness Index Rankings 2003. http://www.weforum.org/. Accessed (5/10/2004).