Successive cyclicity as residual wh-scope marking

Lingua

Volumn 116, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2107-2153

  Stepanov, Arthur ^a   Stateva, Penka ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b Zentrum fur Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft   (Germany)

Author keywords

Complementation; Incorporation; Indirect dependency; Long distance wh movement; Wh scope marker

Indexed keywords

EID: 33751006476     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. Adger D., and Quer J. Subjunctives, unselected embedded questions and clausal polarity items. In: Kusumoto K. (Ed). Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society. vol. 27, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (1997) 1-15
2. Alexiadou A., and Anagnostopoulou E. Parameterizing AGR: word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16 (1998) 491-539
3. Baker M. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function (1988), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
4. Barss A. Syntactic reconstruction effects. In: Baltin M., and Collins C. (Eds). The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory (2001), Blackwell, Oxford 670-696
5. Bayer J. Directionality and Logical Form (1996), Kluwer, Dordrecht
6. Beck S. Quantified structures as barriers for LF movement. Natural Language Semantics 4 (1996) 1-56
7. Bobaljik, Jonathan, 1995. Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
8. Boeckx C., and Stjepanović S. Heading toward PF. Linguistic Inquiry 32 (2001) 345-355
9. Bošković Z. The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation: An Economy Approach (1997), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
10. Bošković Z. On the Nature of Syntax-Phonology Interface: Cliticization in Slavic (2001), Elsevier
11. Bošković Z. A-movement and the EPP. Syntax 5 (2002) 167-218
12. Bošković Z. On the Locality of Move and Agree: Eliminating the Activation Condition, Generalized EPP and the Phase-Impenetrability Condition (2004), Ms., University of Connecticut, Storrs
13. Burrow J.A., and Turville-Petre T. A Book of Middle English (1992), Blackwell, Cambridge, MA
14. Castillo J.C., Edward Drury J., and Grohmann K.K. The Status of the Merge Over Move Preference (2000), College Park, Ms., University of Maryland
15. Chomsky N. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory (1955), Ms., Harvard University, Cambridge, MA (Revised 1956 version published in part by Plenum, New York, 1975; University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1985)
16. Chomsky N. Remarks on nominalization. In: Jacobs R.A., and Rosenbaum P.S. (Eds). Readings in English Transformational Grammar (1970), Ginn and Co., Waltham, MA 184-221 (Reprinted in Studies on semantics in generative grammar. Mouton, The Hague, 1972, pp. 11-61)
17. Chomsky N. Conditions on transformations. In: Anderson S., and Kiparsky P. (Eds). A Festschrift for Morris Halle (1973), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 232-286
18. Chomsky N. On wh-movement. In: Culicover P., et al. (Ed). Formal Syntax (1977), Academic Press, New York 71-132
19. Chomsky N. Barriers (1986), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
20. Chomsky N. The Minimalist Program (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
21. Chomsky N. Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In: Martin R., et al. (Ed). Step by Step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 89-155
22. Chomsky N. Derivation by phase. In: Kenstowicz M. (Ed). Ken Hale: A Life in Language (2001), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1-50
23. Chung S. Unbounded dependencies in Chamorro grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 13 (1982) 39-77
24. Chung S. The Design of Agreement: Evidence from Chamorro (1998), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
25. Clements G.N. String-vacuous rule application. Linguistic Inquiry 14 (1983) 1-17
26. Cole P., and Hermon G. Partial wh-movement: evidence from Malay. In: Lutz U., et al. (Ed). Wh-Scope Marking (2000), Benjamins, Amsterdam 101-130
27. Collins C. Economy of derivation and the generalized proper binding condition. Linguistic Inquiry 25 (1994) 45-61
28. Comrie, Bernard, 1972. Aspects of sentence complementation in Russian. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, Cambridge University.
29. Davidson D. On saying that. In: Davidson D., and Hintikka J. (Eds). Words and Objections (1969), Reidel, Dordrecht 158-174
30. Dayal V. Scope marking as indirect wh-dependency. Natural Language Semantics 2 (1994) 137-170
31. Dayal V. Locality in WH Quantification: Questions and Relative Clauses in Hindi (1996), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
32. Dayal V. Scope marking: in defence of indirect dependency. In: Lutz U., and Müller G. (Eds). Papers on wh-Scope Marking (1996), Universität Stuttgart/Universität Tübingen/IBM Deutschland, Stuttgart/Tübingen 107-130
33. Dayal V. Scope marking: cross-linguistic variation in indirect dependency. In: Lutz U., et al. (Ed). Wh-Scope Marking (2000), Benjamins, Amsterdam 157-193
34. De Villiers J., Roeper T., and Vainikka A. The acquisition of long-distance rules. In: Frazier L., and De Villiers J. (Eds). Language Processing and Language Acquisition (1990), Kluwer, Dordrecht
35. Erteschik, Naomi, 1973. On the nature of island constraints. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
36. Fanselow G., and Mahajan A. Towards a minimalist theory of wh-expletives, wh-copying and successive cyclicity. In: Lutz U., et al. (Ed). Wh-Scope Marking (2000), Benjamins, Amsterdam 195-230
37. Felser C. Wh-expletives and secondary predication: German partial wh-movement reconsidered. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 13 (2001) 5-38
38. Felser C. Wh-copying, phases and successive cyclicity. Lingua 114 (2004) 543-574
39. Fox D. Economy in Semantic Interpretation (2000), MITWPL and MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
40. Franks S. Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax (1995), Oxford University Press, New York
41. Giejgo, Janina Aurelia, 1981. Movement rules in Polish syntax. Doctoral dissertation, University College, London.
42. Halle M., and Marantz A. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In: Hale K., and Jay Keyser S. (Eds). The View from Building. vol. 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger (1993), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 111-176
43. Hamblin C.L. Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10 (1973) 41-53
44. Hand M. On saying that again. Linguistics and Philosophy 14 (1991) 349-365
45. Herburger, Elena, 1994. A semantic difference between full and partial wh-movement in German. Paper presented at the 68th Annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Boston, MA.
46. Höhle T.N. The W-...W-construction: appositive or scope indicating. In: Lutz U., and Müller G. (Eds). Papers on wh-Scope Marking (1996), Universität Stuttgart/Universität Tübingen/IBM Deutschland, Stuttgart/Tübingen 37-58
47. Holland G.B. Subordination and relativization in Early Indo-European. In: Brugman C., and Macaulay M. (Eds). Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. University of California, Berkeley (1984) 609-622
48. Horvath J. The status of 'wh-expletives' and the partial wh-movement construction of Hungarian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15 (1997) 509-572
49. Huang, C.-T. James, 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
50. Izvorski R. The syntax and semantics of correlative proforms. Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society. vol. 26, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (1996) 133-147
51. Kiparsky P., and Kiparsky C. Fact. In: Bierwisch M., and Heidolph K.E. (Eds). Progress in Linguistics (1970), Mouton, The Hague 143-173
52. Kiss K.E. Configurationality in Hungarian (1987), D. Reidel, Dordrecht
53. Koster J. Domains and dynasties (1987), Foris, Dordrecht
54. Lahiri U. On the proper treatment of "expletive wh" in Hindi. Lingua 112 (2002) 501-540
55. Lasnik H. Verbal morphology: syntactic structures meets the minimalist program. In: Campos H., and Kempchinsky P. (Eds). Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Carlos Otero (1995), Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC 251-275
56. Lasnik H. Chains of arguments. In: Epstein S.D., and Hornstein N. (Eds). Working Minimalism (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 189-215
57. Lasnik H., and Saito M. On the nature of proper government. Linguistic Inquiry 15 (1984) 235-289 (Reprinted in Essays on restrictiveness and learnablity, Howard Lasnik. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990, pp. 198-255)
58. Lasnik H., and Saito M. On the subject of infinitives. In: Dobrin L.M., et al. (Ed). Papers from the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society Part One: The General Session (1991), Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 324-343
59. Lasnik H., and Saito M. Move α: Conditions on its Application and Output (1992), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
60. LePore E., and Loewer B. You can say that again. Midwest Studies in Philosophy (1989) XIV
61. In: Lutz U., and Müller G. (Eds). Papers on wh-Scope Marking (1996), Universität Stuttgart//Universität Tübingen/IBM Deutschland, Stuttgart/Tübingen
62. In: Lutz U., Müller G., and von Stechow A. (Eds). Wh-Scope Marking (2000), John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia
63. Mahajan A. Wh-expletives and the syntax of partial wh-movement. In: Lutz U., and Müller G. (Eds). Papers on wh-Scope Marking (1996), Universität Stuttgart/Universität Tübingen/IBM Deutschland, Stuttgart/Tübingen 163-177
64. Mahajan A. Towards a unified treatment of wh-expletives in Hindi and German. In: Lutz U., et al. (Ed). Wh-Scope Marking (2000), Benjamins, Amsterdam 317-332
65. Marácz L. Asymmetries in Hungarian (1989), University of Groningen, Groningen
66. McCloskey J. Quantifier float and wh-movement in Irish English. Linguistic Inquiry 31 (2000) 57-84
67. McCloskey J. Resumption, successive cyclicity and the locality of operations. In: Epstein S., and Seeley D. (Eds). Prospects for Derivational Explanation (2000), Blackwell, Oxford
68. McCloskey J. The morphosyntax of wh-extraction in Irish. Journal of Linguistics 37 (2001) 67-100
69. McDaniel, Dana, 1986. Conditions on wh-chains. Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.
70. McDaniel D. Partial and multiple wh-movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7 (1989) 565-604
71. McDaniel D., Chiu B., and Maxfield T.L. Parameters for wh-movement types: evidence from child English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13 (1995) 709-753
72. Mitchell B., and Robinson F.C. A Guide to Old English (1992), Blackwell, Cambridge, MA
73. Müller G. A-Bar Syntax: A Study of Movement Types (=Studies in Generative Grammar 42) (1995), Mouton de Gruyter, New York
74. Müller G. Partial wh-movement and optimality theory. In: Lutz U., and Müller G. (Eds). Papers on wh-Scope Marking (1996), Universität Stuttgart/Universität Tübingen/IBM Deutschland, Stuttgart/Tübingen 179-230
75. Müller G., and Sternefeld W. Extraction, lexical variation and the theory of barriers. In: Egli U., et al. (Ed). Lexical Knowledge in the Organization of Language (1995), John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia 35-80
76. Myers, Scott, 1984. Zero-derivation and inflection. In: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics. vol. 7: Papers from the January 1984 MIT Workshop in Morphology. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
77. Nunes J., and Uriagereka J. Cyclicity and extraction domains. Syntax 3 (2000) 20-43
78. Ormazabal, Javier, 1995. The syntax of complementation: on the connection between syntactic structure and selection. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
79. Pafel J. Absolute and relative: On scope in German wh-sentences including w...w-constructions. In: Lutz U., et al. (Ed). Wh-Scope Marking (2000), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 333-358
80. Pesetsky, David, 1982. Paths and Categories. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
81. Pesetsky D. Zero Syntax vol. 2 (1992), Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA
82. Pesetsky D. Zero Syntax (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
83. Plessis H.d. Wh-movement in Afrikaans. Linguistic Inquiry 8 (1977) 723-726
84. Postal P. On certain ambiguities. Linguistic Inquiry 5 (1974) 367-424
85. Raposo E., and Uriagereka J. Long-distance case assignment. Linguistic Inquiry 21 (1990) 505-537
86. Roberts I. Excorporation and minimality. Linguistic Inquiry 22 (1991) 209-218
87. Roberts I. Two types of head movement in romance. In: Lightfoot D., and Hornstein N. (Eds). Verb Movement (1994), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 207-242
88. Ross, John Robert, 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
89. Rothstein S.D. Pleonastics and the interpretation of pronoun. Linguistic Inquiry 26 (1995) 499-529
90. Rumfitt I. Content and context: the paratactic theory revisited and revised. Mind 102 407 (1993) 429-454
91. Saddy, Douglas, 1991. Wh scope mechanisms in Bahasa Indonesia. In: Cheng, Lisa, Demirdache, Hamida (Eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 15. MITWPL, Cambridge, MA, pp. 183-218.
92. Segal G., and Speas M. On saying [that]. Mind and Language 1 (1986) 124-132
93. Snyder W. Wh-Extraction and the Lexical Representation of Verbs (1992), Ms., MIT, Cambridge
94. Stepanov A. Wh-scope marking in Slavic. Studia Linguistica 54 (2000) 1-40
95. Stepanov, Arthur, 2001. Cyclic domains in syntactic theory. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs (distributed by MITWPL).
96. Stepanov A., and Georgopoulos C. Structure building and the conceptual interface: an analysis of Russian long-distance wh-questions. In: Lindseth M., and Franks S. (Eds). Proceedings of the V Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (1997), Michigan Slavic Publications, Ann Arbor, MI 275-294
97. Svenonius P. C-selection as feature-checking. Studia Linguistica 48 (1994) 133-155
98. Thornton, Rosalind, 1990. Adventures in long-distance moving: the acquisition of complex wh-questions. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
99. Torrego E. On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects. Linguistic Inquiry 15 (1984) 103-129
100. Torrego E., and Uriagereka J. Indicative Dependents (1993), Ms., University of Massachusetts and University of Maryland, Amherst, MA and College Park, MD
101. Turano G. Overt and covert dependencies in Albanian. Studia Linguistica 52 (1998) 149-183
102. Ura, Hiroyuki, 1996. Multiple feature-checking: a theory of grammatical function splitting. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
103. Uriagereka, Juan, 1988. On government. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
104. Uriagereka J. Minimal restrictions on Basque movements. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17 (1999) 403-444
105. van Geenhoven V. Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions (1998), CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA
106. van Riemsdijk H. Correspondence effects and the empty category principle. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature vol. 12 (1982), University of Tilburg
107. von Stechow A. Partial wh-movement, scope marking and transparent logical form. In: Lutz U., et al. (Ed). Wh-Scope Marking (2000), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 447-478
108. Wahba W.A.-F.B. LF movement in Iraqi Arabic. In: James Huang C.-T., and May R. (Eds). Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure (1991), Kluwer, Dordrecht 253-276
109. Zwicky A.M. In a manner of speaking. Linguistic Inquiry 2 (1971) 223-233