Wh-Expletives And Secondary Predication: German Partial Wh-Movement Reconsidered

Journal of Germanic Linguistics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 5-38

  Felser, Claudia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1342278453     PISSN: 14705427     EISSN: 14753014     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1470542701003178     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Authier, Jean-Marc. 1991. V-governed expletives, case theory, and the projection principle. Linguistic Inquiry 22.721–740.
2. Bayer, Josef. 1996. Directionality and Logical Form. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Beck, Sigrid, and Stephen Berman. 2000. Wh-scope marking: Direct vs. indirect dependency. In Lutz, Müller, and von Stechow (eds.), 17–44.
3. Brandner, Ellen. 2000. Scope marking and clausal typing. In Lutz, Müller, and von Stechow (eds.), 45–75.
4. Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 2000. Moving just the feature. In Lutz, Müller, and von Stechow (eds.), 77–99.
5. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Chomsky, Noam. 1998. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. (MIT occasional papers in linguistics, 15). Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
8. Contreras, Heles. 1995. Small clauses and complex predicates. Small clauses, ed. by Anna Cardinaletti and Maria Teresa Guasti, 135–152. San Diego: Academic Press.
9. Dayal, Veneeta. 1994. Scope marking as indirect wh-dependency. Natural Language Semantics 2.137–170.
10. Dayal, Veneeta. 1996. Scope marking: In defence of indirect dependency. In Lutz and Müller (eds.), 107–130.
11. Dayal, Veneeta. 2000. Scope marking: Cross-linguistic variation in indirect dependency. In Lutz, Müller, and von Stechow (eds.), 157–193.
12. Fanselow, Gisbert, and Anoop Mahajan. 1996. Partial movement and successive cyclicity. In Lutz and Müller (eds.), 131–161.
13. Fanselow, Gisbert, and Anoop Mahajan. 2000. Towards a minimalist theory of wh-expletives, wh- copying, and successive cyclicity. In Lutz, Müller, and von Stechow (eds.), 195–230.
14. Gamon, Michael. 1995. Partial wh-movement in German: A nonhomogeneous wh-dependency. Proceedings of the 24th Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL 24), ed. by V. Samiian and Jeannette Schaeffer, 106–119. Fresno: Department of Linguistics, California State University, Fresno.
15. Haider, Hubert. 1997. Typological implications of a directionality constraint on projections. Studies on universal grammar and typological variation, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou and T. Alan Hall, 17–33. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
16. Haider, Hubert. 2000. Towards a superior account of superiority. In Lutz, Müller, and von Stechow (eds.), 231–248.
17. Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
18. Herburger, Elena. 1994. A semantic difference between full and partial wh-movement in German. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Los Angeles.
19. Hiemstra, Inge. 1986. Some aspects of wh-questions in Frisian. NOWELE 8.97–110.
20. Höhle, Tilman. 2000. The w … w construction: Appositive or scope indicating? In Lutz, Müller, and von Stechow (eds.), 249–270.
21. Horvath, Julia. 1997. The status of “wh-expletives” and the partial wh-movement construction of Hungarian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15.509–572.
22. Horvath, Julia. 2000. On the syntax of “wh-scope” marker constructions: Some comparative evidence. In Lutz, Müller, and von Stechow (eds.), 271–316.
23. Kathol, Andreas. 1999. The scope marking construction in German. Lexical and constructional aspects of linguistic explanation, ed. by Gert Webelhuth, Jean-Pierre Koenig, and Andreas Kathol, 357–371. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
24. Kiss, Katalin. 1991. An argument for movement. Representation and derivation in the theory of grammar, ed. by Hubert Haider and Klaus Netter, 199–215. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
25. Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25.609–665.
26. Lutz, Uli, and Gereon Müller (eds.). 1996. Papers on wh-scope marking. Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340, Bericht No. 76. Stuttgart and Tübingen: University of Stuttgart, University of Tübingen, and IBM Germany.
27. Lutz, Uli, and Arnim von Stechow (eds.). 2000. Wh-scope marking. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
28. Mahajan, Anoop. 1990. The A/A-bar distinction and movement theory. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
29. Mahajan, Anoop. 1996. Wh-expletives and the syntax of partial wh-movement. In Lutz and Müller (eds.), 163–177.
30. Mahajan, Anoop. 2000. Towards a unified treatment of wh-expletives in Hindi and German. In Lutz, Müller, and von Stechow (eds.), 317–332.
31. McDaniel, Dana. 1989. Partial and multiple wh-movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7.565–604.
32. Müller, Gereon. 1997. Partial wh-movement and Optimality Theory. The Linguistic Review 14.249–305.
33. Ouhalla, Jamal. 1996. Remarks on the binding properties of wh-pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 27.676–707.
34. Pafel, Jürgen. 2000. Absolute and relative: On scope in German wh-sentences, was … w-constructions included. In Lutz, Müller, and von Stechow (eds.), 333–358.
35. Reis, Marga. 2000. On the parenthetical features of German was … w constructions and how to account for them. In Lutz, Müller, and von Stechow (eds.), 359–407.
36. Riemsdijk, Henk van. 1983. The correspondence effect and the Empty Category Principle. Studies in generative grammar and language acquisition, ed. by Y. Otsu et al. (eds.), 5–16. Tokyo: Editorial Committee.
37. Rizzi, Luigi. 1992. Argument/adjunct (a)symmetries. Proceedings of NELS 22, 365–381. Dover, DE: Department of Linguistics, University of Delaware.
38. Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Rothstein, Susan. 1995. Pleonastics and the interpretation of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 26.499–529.
40. Sabel, Joachim. 2000. Partial wh-movement and the typology of wh-questions. In Lutz, Müller, and von Stechow (eds.), 409–446.
41. Simpson, Andrew. 2000. Wh-movement and the theory of feature-checking. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
42. Stechow, Arnim von. 2000. Partial wh-movement, scope marking, and transparent Logical Form. In Lutz and Müller (eds.), 1–36.
43. Stechow, Arnim von, and Wolfgang Sternefeld. 1988. Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
44. Stroik, Thomas. 1996. Extraposition and expletive movement: A minimalist account. Lingua 99.237–251.
45. Wahba, Wafaa. 1991. LF movement in Iraqi Arabic. Logical structure and linguistic structure: Cross-linguistic perspectives, ed. by C.-T. James Huang and Robert May, 253–276. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
46. Williams, Edwin. 1997. Lexical and syntactic complex predicates. Complex predicates, ed. by Alex Alsina, Joan Bresnan, and Peter Sells, 13–28. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
47. Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 1994. Dutch is head initial. The Linguistic Review 11.377–406.