Orton-Gillingham and Orton-Gillingham-based reading instruction: A review of the literature

Journal of Special Education

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 171-183

  Ritchey, Kristen D ^a   Goeke, Jennifer L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750980698     PISSN: 00224669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00224669060400030501     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bhat, P., Rapport, M. J., & Griffin, C. C. (200(1). A legal perspective on the use of specific reading methods for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly. 21, 283-297.
2. Biasotto, V. L. (1993). Project ASSIST Institute: An Orton-Gillingham/ Spalding based curriculum for teachers and volunteers. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 260-270.
3. Brown, V., Hammill, D. D., & Wiederholt, J. (1978). The Test of Reading Comprehension. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
4. Chandler, C. T., Munday, R., Tunnell, J. W., & Windham, R. (1993). Orton Gillingham: A reading strategy revisited. Reading Improvement. 30, 59-64.
5. Clark, D. B., & Uhry, J. K. (1995). Dyslexia: Theory and practice of remedial instruction. Baltimore: York Press.
6. Cohen. J. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Cox, A. R. (1992). Foundations for literacy: Structures and techniques for multisensory teaching of basic written language skills. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishers Service.
8. Dooley, B. (1994). Multisensorially integrating reading and composition: Effects on achievement of remedial readers in middle school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Demon: Texas Woman's University..
9. Edmark Reading Program. (1984). Redwood, WA: Edmark Corporation.
10. Enfield, M. L. (1971). Specific language disability programs in Bloomington, Minnesota Public Schools. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 21, 95-110.
11. Enfield, M. L., & Greene, V. (1997). Project read. Bloomington. MN: Language Circle Enterprise.
12. Fast ForWord. (1998). Berkely, CA: Scientific Learning Corporation.
13. Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Winikates, D., Mehta, P., Schatschneider, C., & Fletcher, J. M. (1997). Early interventions for children with learning disabilities. Scientific Studies in Reading, 1, 255-276.
14. Gersten, R., Chard, D., & Baker, S. (2000), Factors enhancing sustained use of research-based instructional practices. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 445-457.
15. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators of group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149-164.
16. Gillingham, A., & Stillman, B. W. (1960). Remedial training for children with specific disability in reading, spelling, and penmanship. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.
17. Gillingham, A., & Stillman, B. W. (1997). The Gillingham manual: Remedial training for children with specific disability in reading, spelling, and penmanship. (8th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.
18. Greenwood, C. R., & Abbott, M. (2001). The research to practice gap in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 276-289.
19. Guyer, B. P., Banks, S. R., & Guyer, K. E. (1993). Spelling improvement for college students who are dyslexic. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 186-193.
20. Guyer, B. P., & Sabatino, D. (1989). The effectiveness of a multisensory Alphabetic Phonics approach with college students who are learning disabled. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 430-434.
21. Hammill, D., & Larsen, S. C. (1988). The test of written language-2nd edition. Austin. TX: ProEd.
22. Herman, R. (1993). The Herman method for reversing reading failure. Sherman Oaks, CA: Herman Method Institute.
23. Hook, P., Macaruso, P., & Jones, S. (2001). Efficacy of Fast ForWord training on facilitating acquisition of reading skills by children with reading difficulties: A longitudinal study. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 75-96.
24. Hutcheson, L., Selig, H., & Young, N. (1990). A success story: A large urban district offers a working model for implementing multisensory teaching into the resource and regular classroom. Annals of Dyslexia, 40, 79-96.
25. Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). The Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
26. Joshi, R. M., Dahlgren, M., & Boulware-Gooden, R. (2002). Teaching reading in an inner city school through a multisensory approach. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 229-242.
27. Karlsen, B. R., & Gardner, E. (1985). Stanford diagnostic reading test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
28. Knight, J. K. (1995). Starting over: An overview. In C. W. McIntyre & J. S. Pickering (Eds.), Clinical studies of multisensory structured language education (pp. 231-232). Salem, OR: International Multisensory Structured Language Education Council.
29. Lindamood, C., & Lindamood, P. (1979). The Lindamood auditory conceptualization test. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
30. Litcher, J. H., & Roberge, L. P. (1979). First grade intervention for reading achievement of high risk children. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 24, 238-244.
31. MacGinitie, W. H., & MacGinitie, R. K. (1989). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests, Itasca, IL: Riverside.
32. McIntyre, C. W., & Pickering, J. S. (Eds.). (1995). Clinical studies of multisensory structured language education. Salem, OR: International Multisensory Structured Language Education Council.
33. No Child Left Behind. (2002). Retrieved September 27, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02.html
34. Oakland, T., Black, J. L., Stanford, G., Nussbaum, N. L., & Balise, R. R. (1998). An evaluation of the Dyslexia Training Program: A multisensory method for promoting reading in students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 140-147.
35. Ogden, S., Hindman, S., & Turner, S. D. (1989). Multisensory programs in the public schools: A brighter future for LD children. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 247-267.
36. Orton, S. (1937). Reading, writing, and speech problems in children. New York: Norton.
37. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Simpson, S. B., Swanson, J. M., & Kunkel, K. (1992). The impact of an intensive multisensory reading program on a population of learning disabled delinquents. Annals of Dyslexia, 42, 54-66.
39. Slingerland, B. H., & Aho, M. (1994-1996). Slingerland reading program. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.
40. Spalding, R. B., & Spalding, W. T. (1990). The writing road to reading (4th ed.). New York: Quill.
41. Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1993). The effects of multisensory structured language instruction on native language and foreign language aptitude skills of at-risk high school foreign language learners: A replication and follow-up study. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 194-216.
42. Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Kenneweg, S., & Miller, K. (1991). Use of an Orton-Gillingham approach to a foreign language to dyslexic/learning-disabled students: Explicit teaching of phonology in a second language. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 96-118.
43. Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Pohlman, J., Skinner, S., & Artzer, M. (1992). The effects of multiscnsory structured language instruction on native language and foreign language aptitude skills of at-risk foreign language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 42, 25-53.
44. Stoner, J. (1991). Teaching at-risk students to read using specialized techniques in the regular classroom. Reading and Writing. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 3, 19-30.
45. Torgesen, J. K., & Bryant, B. R. (1994). The test of phonological awareness. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
46. Traub, N., & Bloom, F. (1992). Recipe for reading (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.
47. Vickery, K. S., Reynolds, V. A., & Cochran, S. W. (1987). Multisensory teaching approach for reading, spelling, and handwriting: Orton-Gillingham based curriculum in a public school setting. Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 189-200.
48. Westrich-Bond, A. (1993). The effect of direct instruction of a synthetic sequential phonics program on the decoding abilities of elementary school learning disabled students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New Brunswick: The State University of New Jersey, Rutgers.
49. Wilson, B. A. (1996). Wilson reading system. Millbury, MA: Wilson Language Training Corporation.
50. Woodcock, R. W. (1973). Woodcock reading mastery test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
51. Woodcock, R. W. (1989). Woodcock reading mastery test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
52. Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery test-Revised/Normative Update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
53. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson psychoeducational battery-Revised. Chicago: Riverside.