A legal perspective on the use of specific reading methods for students with learning disabilities

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 283-297

  Bhat, Preetha ^b   Rapport, Mary Jane K ^a   Griffin, Cynthia C ^b  

^a JFK Partners   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034361575     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1511350     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Anderson, R., Hiebert, E., Scott, J., & Wilkinson, I. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading. Champaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.
2. Austin Independent School District, 25 IDELR 875 (SEA Tex. 1997).
3. Bend-Lapine School District, 23 IDELR 583 (SEA Or. 1995).
4. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
5. Brandywine School District, 21 IDELR 1013 (SEA Del. 1994).
6. Brown, I.S., & Felton, R.H. (1990). Effects of instruction on beginning reading skills in children at risk for reading disability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 223-241.
7. Clark, D.B. (1988). Dyslexia: Theory and practice of remedial instruction. Parkton, MD: York Press.
8. Doe v. The Board of Education of Tullahoma City Schools, 9 F. 3d 455 (6th Cir. 1993).
9. E. S. v. Independent School District No. 196, 135 F. 3d 566 (8th Cir. 1998).
10. Epstein, M.H., & Cullinan, D. (1981). Project EXCEL: A behaviorally-oriented educational program for learning disabled pupils. Education and Treatment of Children, 4, 357-373.
11. Evans v. The Board of Education of the Rhineheck Central School District, 930 F. Supp. 83 (S.D.N.Y. 1996).
12. Florence County School District Four v. Carter, 114 S. Ct. 361 (1993).
13. Fontana, J. (1995). Portfolio assessment: Its beginnings in Vermont and Kentucky. NASSP Bulletin, 79(573), 25-30.
14. Frankiewicz, R.G. (1985). An evaluation of the Alphabetic Phonics Program offered in the one-to-one mode. Houston, TX: Neuhaus Education Center.
15. Fremont Unified School District, 27 IDELR 1092 (SEA Cal. 1997).
16. Garden City Public Schools, 18 IDELR 686 (SEA Mich. 1991).
17. Gittelman, R., & Feingold, I. (1983). Children with reading disorders: Efficacy of reading remediation. Journal of Childhood Psychology and Psychiatry, 24, 167-191.
18. Grafton Public School, 22 IDELR 528 (SEA Mass. 1995).
19. Gwinnett County School System, 27 IDELR 890 (SEA Ga. 1998).
20. Hampden-Wilbraham Regional School District, 16 EHLR 534 (SEA Mass. 1990).
21. Hawaii Department of Education, 25 IDELR 782 (SEA Haw. 1997).
22. Kathleen H. v. Massachusetts Department of Education, 28 IDELR 1067 (1st Cir. 1998).
23. Kennedy K.M., & Blackman, J. (1993). Effectiveness of the Lindamood Auditory Discrimination in Depth program with students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 8, 253-259.
24. Lenn v. Portland School Committee, 998 F. 2d 1083 (1st Cir. 1993).
25. Lyon, G.R. (1995). Research initiatives in learning disabilities: Contributions from scientists supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Journal of Child Neurology, 10, 120-126.
26. Marin County Office of Education and Tamalpais Union High School District, 1988-89 EHLR, 401:293 (SEA Cal. 1989).
27. Mehrens, W.A. (1992). Using performance assessment for accountability purposes. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11(1), 3-9.
28. Meyer, L.A., Green, E.A., & Crummey, L. (1986). Are first grade basal reading programs really all that much alike? An analysis of the labyrinth of instructional approaches to decoding, comprehension, and story text comprehensibility in four programs. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc.
29. Montgomery County Public Schools, 24 IDELR 975 (SEA Md. 1996).
30. Moubry v. Independent School District Number 696, 28 IDELR 848 (D. Minn. 1998).
31. North Attelborough Public Schools, 23 IDELR 285 (SEA Mass. 1995).
32. Norton Public Schools, 16 EHLR 832 (SEA Mass. 1995).
33. Oak View Union School District, 24 IDELR 183 (SEA Cal. 1995).
34. Ogden, S., Hindman, S., & Turner, S.D. (1989). Multisensory programs in the public schools: A brighter future for LD children. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 247-267.
35. Pascoe v. Washingtonville Central School District, 29 IDELR 31 (S.D.N.Y. 1998).
36. Pomona Unified School District, 19 IDELR 603 (SEA Cal. 1993).
37. Popham, J.A. (1999). Classroom assessment. What teachers need to know (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
38. Rochester School District, 18 IDELR 327 (SEA Vt. 1991).
39. Santa Barbara High School District, 26 IDELR 473 (SEA Cal. 1997).
40. Sargent, J.K. (1998). The handbook of private schools (79th ed.). Boston, MA: Porter Sargent Publications.
41. School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of the Commonwealth of Mass., 471 U.S. 359 (1985).
42. Snow, C., Burns, M.S., & Griffln, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
43. Somerville Public Schools, 22 IDELR 764 (SEA Mass. 1995).
44. Vickerey, K.S., Reynolds, V., & Cochran, S. W. (1987). Multisensory teaching approach for reading, spelling, and hand writing: Orton-Gillingham based curriculum in a public setting Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 189-199.
45. Vista Unified School District, 24 IDELR 189 (SEA Cal. 1995).
46. Wall v. Mattituck-Cutchogue School District, 945 F. Supp. 501 (E.D.N.Y. 1996).
47. Walpole Public Schools, 16 EHLR 701 (SEA Mass. 1990).
48. Waltham Public Schools, 23 IDELR 168 (SEA Mass. 1995).