Diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia (FEA) after stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) of the breast: What is the best management: Systematic surgery for all or follow-up?;Lésions de métaplasie cylindriques atypiques (MCA) diagnostiquées par macrobiopsies assistées par aspiration: Opportunité d'une exérèse chirurgicale?

Journal de Radiologie

Volumn 87, Issue 11 C1, 2006, Pages 1671-1677

  David, N ^a   Labbe Devilliers, C ^a   Moreau, D ^a   Loussouarn, D ^b   Campion, L ^c  

^a CENTRE RENÉ GAUDUCHEAU   (France)

^b CHU de Nantes   (France)

^c Département d'Informatique Médicale Centre René Gauducheaux

Author keywords

Breast; Breast flat epithelia plane; Breast vacuum assisted biopsy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST SURGERY; CELL HYPERPLASIA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOTHELIAL DYSFUNCTION; FLAT EPITHELIUM ATYPIA; FOLLOW UP; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAMMOGRAPHY; RISK FACTOR; VACUUM ASSISTED BIOPSY;

EID: 33750951275     PISSN: 02210363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0221-0363(06)74145-2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Agence Nationale d'Accréditation et d'Évaluation en Santé (ANAES). Recommandation pour la pratique clinique. Conduite à tenir devant une image mammographique infra-clinique anormale. 1999, Paris.
2. Schmitt SJ, Vincent-Salomon A. Columnar cell lesions of the breast. Adv Anat Pathol 2003;10:113-24.
3. Nasser SM. Columnar cell lesions: Current Classification and Controversies. Semin Diagn Pathol 2004;21:18-24.
4. Fraser JL, Raza S, Chorny K, et al. Columnar alteration with prominent apical snouts and secretions: A spectrum of changes frequently present in breast biopsies performed for microcalcifications. Am J Surg Pathol 1998;22:1521-7.
5. Shabaan AM, Sloane JP, West CR, et al. Histopathologic types of benign breast lesions and the risk of breast cancer: case-control study. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:421-30.
6. Eusebi V, Forchini MP, Cook MG, et al. Long-term follow up of in situ carcinoma of the breast with special emphasis on clinging carcinoma. Semin Diagn Pathol 1989;6:165-73.
7. Schnitt SJ. Flat epithelia plane - classification, pathologic features and clinical significiance. Breast Cancer Res 2003;5:263-8.
8. Goldstein NS, O'Malley BA. Cancerization of small ecstatic ducts of the breast by ductal carcinoma in situ cells with apocrine snouts: A lesion associated with tubular carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 1997;107:561-6.
9. Page DL, Kasami M, Jensen RA. Hypersecretory hyperplasia with atypia in breast biopsy. What is the proper level of clinical concern? Pathol Case Rev 1996;1:36-40.
10. Vincent-Salomon A. La métaplasie cylindrique : un diagnostic fréquent en pathologie mammaire ! Ann Pathol 2003; 23:593-6.
11. Berg WA. Image-guided breast biopsy and management of high-risk lesions. Radio Clin N Am 2004;42:935-46.
12. Jacobs TW, Conolly JL, Schnitt SJ. Non malignant lesions in breast core biopsies To excise or not to excise. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:1095-110.
13. Rosen PP. Columnar cell hyperplasia in associated with lobular carcinoma in situ and tubular carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23:1561.
14. Goldstein NS, Lacerna M, Vicini F. Cancerization of lobules and atypical ductal hyperplasia adjacent to ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Am J Clin Pathol 1998;10:357-67.
15. American College of Radiology. Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 3 rd .ed. Reston, Va: American college of Radiology ed.1998.
16. Jackman RJ, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision? Radiology 2002;224:548-54.
17. Bonneau C, Lebas P, Michenet P. Cicatrice et lésions de déplacement. Étude anatomopathologique de 31 pièces opératoires après macrobiopsies à l'aiguille de 11 gauge pour des foyers de microcalcifications du sein. Ann Pathol 2002;22:441-7.
18. Oyama T, Maluf H, Koerner F. Atypical cystic lobules: an early stage in the formation of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. Virchows Arch 1999;435:413-21.
19. Weidner N. Malignant breast lesions that may mimic benign tumors. Semin Diagn Pathol 1995;12:2-13.
20. Eusebi V, Feudale E, Foschini MP, et al. Long-term follow up of in situ carcinoma of the breast. Semin Diagn Pathol 1994;11:223-35.
21. Bijker N, Peterse JL, Duchateau L, et al. Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma-in-situ: analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10 853. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2263-71.
22. Bonnett M, Wallis T, Rossmann M, et al. Histopathologic analysis of atypical lesions in image guided core biopsies. Mod Pathol 16:154-60
23. Bibeau F, Chateau MC, Masson B. Prise en charge des lésions mammaires infracliniques par macrobiopsies assistées par le vide. Ann Pathol 2003;23:582-92.
24. Guerra-Wallace MM, Christensen WN, White RL. A retrospective study of columnar alteration with prominent apical snouts and secretions and the association with cancer. Am J Surg 2004; 188:395-8.
25. Brogi E, Tan LK. Findings at excisional biopsy (EBX) performed after identification of columnar cell change (CCC) of ductal epithelium in breast core biopsy (CBX). Mod Pathol 2002;15:29A-30A.
26. Harigopal M, Yao DX, Hoda SA, et al. Columnar cell alteration diagnosed on mammotome core biopsy for indeterminate microcalcifications: Results of subsequent mammograms and surgical excision. Mod Pathol 2002;15:36A.
27. Nasser SM, Fan MJ. Does atypical columnar cell hyperplasia on breast core biopsy warrant follow up excision? Mod Pathol. 2003;16:42A.
28. Plantade R, Hammou JC, Fighiera M, Aubanel D. Scotto A, gueret S. Sous-estimation du cancer du sein par les macrobiopsies stéré otaxiques 11-gauge assistées par le vide. J Radiol. 2004;85:391-401.
29. Balu-Maestro C, Ettore F, Chapellier C, Peyrottes I, Leblanc-Talent P. Quand se méfier des resultants des micromacrobiopsies guides mammaires ? J Radiol. 2006;87:265-73.