Third-party prospective evaluation of patient outcomes after dynamic graciloplasty

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 93, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1402-1410

  Tillin, T ^a,c   Cannon, K ^b   Feldman, R A ^a   Williams, N S ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DYNAMIC GRACILOPLASTY; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL CARE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING SYSTEM; STOMA; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANAL CANAL; CHRONIC DISEASE; COLOSTOMY; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33750946180     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5393     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Byrne CM, Pager CK, Rex J, Roberts R, Solomon MJ. Assessment of quality of life in the treatment of patients with neuropathic fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 1431-1436.
2. Sailer M, Bussen D, Debus ES, Fuchs KH, Thiede A. Quality of life in patients with benign anorectal disorders. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1716-1719.
3. Leigh RJ, Turnberg LA. Faecal incontinence: the unvoiced symptom. Lancet 1982; i: 1349-1351.
4. Rintala R, Mildh L, Lindahl H. Fecal continence and quality of life for adult patients with an operated high or intermediate anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg 1994; 29: 777-780.
5. Crowell MD, Schettler-Duncan VA, Brookhart K, Barofsky I. Fecal incontinence: impact on psychosocial function and health-related quality of life. Gastroenterology 1998; 114: A738 (Abstract).
6. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, Interventional Procedures Programme. Interventional Procedure Overview of Sacral Nerve Stimulation for Faecal Incontinence. http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/ip/123overview.pdf [May 2003].
7. Wade B. A Stoma is for Life: a Study ofStoma Care Nurses and their Patients. Scutari Press: Harrow, 1989.
8. Thomas C, Madden F, Jehu D. Psychological effects of stomas - I. Psychosocial morbidity one year after surgery. J Psychosom Res 1987; 31: 311-316.
9. White CA, Unwin JC. Post-operative adjustment to surgery resulting in the formation of a stoma: the importance of stoma-related cognition. Br J Health Psychol 1998; 3: 85-93.
10. MacDonald LD, Anderson HR. Stigma in patients with rectal cancer: a community study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1984; 38: 284-290.
11. Bekkers MJ, van Knippenberg FC, van den Borne HW, Poen H, Bergsma J, vanBergeHenegouwen GP. Psychosocial adaptation to stoma surgery: a review. J Behav Med 1995; 18: 1-31.
12. Bekkers MJ, van Knippenberg FC, van Dulmen AM, van den Borne HW, van Berge Henegouwen GP. Survival and psychosocial adjustment to stoma surgery and nonstoma bowel resection: a 4-year follow-up. J Psychosom Res 1997; 42: 235-244.
13. Makela JT, Turku PH, Laitinen ST. Analysis of late stomal complications following ostomy surgery. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1997; 86: 305-310.
14. Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK. Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 916-920.
15. Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 784-793.
16. Williams NS. Surgery of anorectal incontinence. Lancet 1999; 353(Suppl 1): SI31-SI32.
17. Chapman AE, Geerdes B, Hewett P, Young J, Eyers T, Kiroff G et al. Systematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 138-153.
18. Kind P, Hardman G, Macran S. UK Population Norms for the EQ5D. Discussion Paper 172. University of York, Centre for Health Economics: York, 1999.
19. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Backett EM, Williams J, Papp E. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1980; 34: 281-286.
20. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361-370.
21. Tillin T, Chambers M, Feldman R. Outcomes of electrically stimulated gracilis neosphincter surgery. Health Technol Assess 2005; 9: 1-102.
22. Oliveira L, Pfeifer J, Wexner SD. Physiological and clinical outcome of anterior sphincteroplasty. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 502-505.
23. Mander BJ, Williams NS. The electrically stimulated gracilis neo-anal sphincter. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1997; 9: 435-441.
24. Madoff RD, Rosen HR, Baeten CG, LaFontaine LJ, Cavina E, Devesa M et al. Safety and efficacy of dynamic muscle plasty for anal incontinence: lessons from a prospective, multicenter trial. Gastroenterology 1999; 116: 549-556.
25. Wexner SD, Baeten C, Bailey R, Bakka A, Belin B, Belliveau P et al. Long-term efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2002; 45: 809-818.
26. Rongen MJ, Uludag O, El Naggar K, Geerdes BP, Konsten J, Baeten CG. Long-term follow-up of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 716-721.
27. O'Brien PE, Skinner S. Restoring control: the Acticon Neosphincter artificial bowel sphincter in the treatment of anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1213-1216.
28. Lehur PA, Roig JV, Duinslaeger M. Artificial anal sphincter: prospective clinical and manometric evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1100-1106.
29. Mundy L, Merlin TL, Maddern GJ, Hiller JE. Systematic review of safety and effectiveness of an artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 665-672.