메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 643-647

Peer reviewing for the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: What does it take?

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; FAMILY MEDICINE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; TRAINING;

EID: 33750943640     PISSN: 15572625     EISSN: 15587118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.19.6.643     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (3)

References (9)
  • 1
    • 33745904755 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer review process of the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
    • Neale AV, Bowman MA. Peer review process of the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:209-10.
    • (2006) J Am Board Fam Med , vol.19 , pp. 209-210
    • Neale, A.V.1    Bowman, M.A.2
  • 3
    • 27944469182 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Conflict of interest: Can we minimize its influence in the biomedical literature?
    • Neale AV, Schwartz KL, Bowman MA. Conflict of interest: can we minimize its influence in the biomedical literature? J Am Board Fam Pract 2005;18:411-3.
    • (2005) J Am Board Fam Pract , vol.18 , pp. 411-413
    • Neale, A.V.1    Schwartz, K.L.2    Bowman, M.A.3
  • 5
    • 0034096422 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to write a case report
    • McCarthy LH, Reilly REH. How to write a case report. Fam Med 2000;32:190-5.
    • (2000) Fam Med , vol.32 , pp. 190-195
    • McCarthy, L.H.1    Reilly, R.E.H.2
  • 6
    • 2042458387 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): A patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature
    • Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD, et al. Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. J Am Board Fam Pract 2004;17:59-67.
    • (2004) J Am Board Fam Pract , vol.17 , pp. 59-67
    • Ebell, M.H.1    Siwek, J.2    Weiss, B.D.3
  • 7
    • 0035901583 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The CONSORT Statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials
    • Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman, DG. The CONSORT Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:657-62.
    • (2001) Ann Intern Med , vol.134 , pp. 657-662
    • Moher, D.1    Schulz, K.F.2    Altman, D.G.3
  • 8
    • 33644792767 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reporting of non-inferiority and equivalence randomized trials: An extension of the CONSORT statement
    • CONSORT Group
    • Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Popock SJ, Evans SJ, CONSORT Group. Reporting of non-inferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA 2006;295:1152-60.
    • (2006) JAMA , vol.295 , pp. 1152-1160
    • Piaggio, G.1    Elbourne, D.R.2    Altman, D.G.3    Popock, S.J.4    Evans, S.J.5
  • 9
    • 0033610734 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses
    • Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet 1999;354:1896-900.
    • (1999) Lancet , vol.354 , pp. 1896-1900
    • Moher, D.1    Cook, D.J.2    Eastwood, S.3    Olkin, I.4    Rennie, D.5    Stroup, D.F.6


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.