pH, Ionic strength and flow velocity effects on the NOM filtration with TiO2/ZrO2 membranes

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 325-331

  de la Rubia, Ángeles ^a   Rodríguez, Manuel ^a   Prats, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Ceramic membrane; Humic substances; Ultrafiltration; Zeta potential

Indexed keywords

CERAMIC MATERIALS; MOLECULES; PH EFFECTS; ULTRAFILTRATION;

CERAMIC MEMBRANE; HUMIC SUBSTANCES; ZETA POTENTIAL;

TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

EID: 33750943477     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2006.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Fane A.G. Membranes for water production and wastewater reuse. Desalination 106 (1996) 1-9
2. Yuan W., and Zydney A.L. Humic acid fouling during micro filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 157 (1999) 1-12
3. Gorenflo A., Velázquez-Padrón D., and Frimmel F.H. Nanofiltration of a German groundwater of high hardness and NOM content: performance and costs. Desalination 151 (2002) 253-265
4. Ruohomäki K., Väisänen P., Metsämuuronen S., Kulovaara M., and Nyström M. Characterization and removal of humic substances in ultra- and nanofiltration. Desalination 118 (1998) 273-283
5. Teixeira M.R., and Rosa M.J. pH adjustment for seasonal control of UF fouling by natural waters. Desalination 151 (2002) 165-175
6. Lee S., and Cho J. Comparison of ceramic and polymeric membranes for natural organic matter (NOM) removal. Desalination 160 (2004) 223-232
7. Nazzal F.F., and Wiesner M.R. pH and ionic strength effects on the performance of ceramic membranes in water filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 93 1 (1994) 91-103
8. Bodzek M., and Konieczny K. Comparison of various membrane types and module configurations in the treatment of natural water by means of low-pressure membrane methods. Sep. Pur. Technol. 14 (1998) 69-78
9. Jones K.L., and O'Melia C.R. Ultra filtration of protein and humic substances: effect of solution chemistry on fouling and flux decline. J. Membr. Sci. 193 (2001) 163-173
10. Childress A.E., and Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 119 (1996) 253-268
11. Ghosh K., and Schnitzer M. Macromolecular structures of humic substances. Soil Sci. 129 5 (1982) 266
12. Martín A., Martínez F., Malfeito J., Palacio L., Prádanos P., and Hernández A. Zeta potential of membranes as a function of pH optimization of isoelectric point evaluation. J. Membr. Sci. 213 (2003) 225-230
13. Hong S., and Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 132 (1997) 159-181
14. 2-ultrafiltration membranes. Surf. Interface Anal. 25 (1997) 593-595
15. Carrère H., Schaffer A., and René F. Cross-flow filtration of guar gum solutions. Experimental results. Sep. Pur. Technol. 14 (1998) 59-67
16. Nyström M., Pihlajamäki A., and Ehsani N. Characterization of ultrafiltration membranes by simultaneous streaming potential and flux measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 87 (1994) 245-256
17. Khayet M., Velázquez A., and Mengual J.I. Direct contact membrane distillation of humic acid solution. J. Membr. Sci. 240 (2004) 123-128
18. Singh S., Khulbe K.C., Matsuura T., and Ramamurthy P. Membrane characterization by solute transport and atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 142 1 (1998) 111-127
19. Szymczyk A., Pierre A., Regginiani J.C., and Pagetti J. Characterisation of the electrokinetic properties of plane inorganic membranes using streaming potential measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 134 (1997) 59-66
20. Zaho Y., Xing W., Xu N., and Wong F.K. Effect of inorganic salt on ceramic membrane micro filtration of titanium dioxide suspension. J. Membr. Sci. 254 (2005) 81-88
21. Costa A.R., and de Pinho M.N. Effect of membrane pore size and solution chemistry on the ultrafiltration of humic substances solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 255 (2005) 49-56