Invasion biology as a community process: Messages from microbial microcosms

Conceptual Ecology and Invasion Biology: Reciprocal Approaches to Nature

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 343-367

  Warren, Philip H ^a   Law, Richard ^b   Weatherby, Anita J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^c OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750939372     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4925-0_16     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. Anderson, R. M. and May, R. M. (1991) Infectious diseases of humans. Oxford University Press Oxford, UK.
2. Bailey, N. T. J. (1964) Elements of stochastic processes. Wiley, New York, U. S. A.
3. Burkey, T. V. (1997) Metapopulation extinction in fragmented landscapes: using bacteria and protozoa communities as model ecosystems. Am. Nat. 150, 568-591.
4. Byers, J. E. and Noonburg, E. G. (2003) Scale dependent effects of biotic resistance to biological invasion. Ecology 84, 1428-1433.
5. Carpenter, S. R. (1996) Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology. Ecology 77, 677-680.
6. Carpenter, S. R. (1999) Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology: reply. Ecology 80, 1085-1088.
7. Case, T. J. (1990) Invasion resistence arises in strongly interacting species-rich models of competition communities. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 9610-9614.
8. Case, T. J. (1995) Surprising behavior from a familiar model and implications for competition theory. Am. Nat. 146, 961-966.
9. Crawley, M. J. (1986) The population biology of invaders. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 314, 711-731.
10. Crawley, M. J. (1989) Chance and timing in biological invasions, pp. 407-423 In: Drake, J. A., Mooney, H. A., di Castri, F., Groves, R. H., Kruger, F. J., Rejmanek, M. and Williamson, M. (eds.) Biological invasions: a global perspective. SCOPE 3 7. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
11. Davis, M. A, Grime, J. P. and Thompson, K. (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol. 88, 528-534.
12. Davis, M. A. and Pelsor M. (2001) Experimental support for a resource-based mechanistic model of invasibility. Ecol. Lett. 4, 421-428.
13. Diamond, J. and Case, T. J. (1986) Overview: introductions, extinctions, exterminations and invasions, pp. 65-79 In: Diamond, J. and Case, T. J. (eds.) Community Ecology. Harper and Row, New York, U. S. A.
14. Dick, J. T. A., Platvoet, D. and Kelly D. W. (2002) Predatory impact of the freshwater invader Dikerogammarus villosus (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59, 1078-1084.
15. Dickerson, J. E. and Robinson, J. D. (1984) The assembly ofmicroscopic communities: patterns of species importance. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 103, 164-171.
16. Dickerson, J. E. and Robinson, J. V. (1985) Microcosms as islands: a test ofthe MacArthurWilson equilibrium theory. Ecology 66, 966-980.
17. Dickerson, J. E. and Robinson, J. V. (1986) The controlled assembly of microcosmic communities: the selective extinction hypothesis. Oecologia 71, 12-17.
18. Drake, J. A. (1990a) Communities as assembled structures: do rules govern pattern? Trends Ecol. Evol. 5, 159-164.
19. Drake, J. A. (1990b) The mechanics of community assembly and succession. J. Theor. Biol. 147, 213-234.
20. Drake, J. A. (1991) Community-assembly mechanics and the structure of an experimental species ensemble. Am. Nat. 137, 1-26.
21. Drake, J. A., Flum, T. E., Witteman, G. J., Voskuil, T., Holyman, A. M., Creson, C, Kenny, D. A., Huxel, G. R., Larue, C. S. and Duncan, J. R. (1993) The construction and assembly of an ecological landscape. J. Anim. Ecol. 62, 117-130.
22. Drake, J. A., Huxel, G. R. and Hewitt, C. L. (1996) Microcosms as models for generating and testing community theory. Ecology 77, 670-677.
23. Drake, J. A., Mooney, H. A., di Casti, F., Groves, R. H., Kruger, F. J., Rejmanek, M. and Williamson, M. (ed.) (1989) Biological invasions: a global perspective. SCOPE 3 7. John Wiley and Sons Chichester, UK.
24. Drenner, R. W. and Mazumder, A. (1999) Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology. Ecology 80, 1081-1085.
25. Dukes, J. S. (2001) Biodiversity and invasibility in grassland microcosms. Oecologia 126, 563-568.
26. Elton, C. S. (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Menthuen, London, UK.
27. Estes, J. A., Williams, M. T. and Doak, D. F. (1998) Killes whale predation on sea otters linking oceanic and nearshore ecosystems. Science 282, 473-476.
28. Flux, J. E. (1994) World distribution, pp. 8-21 In: Thompson, H. V. and King, C. M. (eds.) The European rabbit: the history and biology of a successful invader. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
29. Fukami, T. and Morin, P. J. (2003) Productivity-biodiversity relationships depend on the history of community assembly. Nature 424, 423-426.
30. Goel, N. S. and Richter-Dyn, N. (1974) Stochastic models in biology. Academic Press New York, U. S. A.
31. Gray, A. J. and Crawley, M. J. and Edwards, P. J. (ed.) (1987) Colonization, succession and stability. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
32. Hector, A., Dobson, K., Minns, A., Bazeley-White, E. and Lawton, J. H. (2001) Community diversity and invasion resistance: an experimental test in a grassland ecosystem and a review of comparable studies. Ecol. Res. 16, 819-831.
33. Herbold, B. and Moyle, P. B. (1986) Introduced species and vacant niches. Am. Nat. 128, 751-760.
34. Hobbs, R. J. (1989) The nature and effects of disturbance relative to invasions. Ch. 17 pp. 389-405 In: Drake, J. A., Mooney, H. A., di Castri, F., Groves, R. H., Kruger, F. J., Rejmánek, M. and Williamson, M. (ed.) Biological invasions: a global perspective. SCOPE 3 7. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
35. Hodgson, D. J., Rainey, P. B. and Buckling, A. (2002) Mechanisms linking diversity, productivity and invasibility in experimental bacterial communities. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B269, 2277-2283.
36. Holt, A. R., Warren, P. H. and Gaston, K. J. (2002) The importance ofbiotic interactions in abundance-occupancy relationships. J. Anim. Ecol. 71, 846-854.
37. Holyoak, M. and Lawler, S. P. (1996) Persistence of an extinction prone predator-prey interaction through metapopulation dynamics. Ecology 77, 1867-1879.
38. Holyoak, M. and Lawler, S. P. (1996) The role of dispersal in predator-prey metapopulation dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol. 65, 640-652.
39. Hopper, K. R. and Roush, R. T. (1993) Mate finding, dispersal, number released, and the success of biological control introductions. Ecol. Entomol. 18, 321-323.
40. Huston, M. A. (1997) Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110, 449-460.
41. Jiang, L. and Morin, P. J. (2004) Productivity gradients cause positive diversity-invasibility relationships in microbial communities. Ecol. Lett. 7, 1047-1057.
42. Jessup, C. M., Kassen, R., Fordel, S. E., Kerr, B., Buckling, A., Rainey, P. B. and Bohannan, B. J. M. (2004) Big questions, small worlds: microbial model systems in ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 189-197.
43. Kola, C. S. and Lodge, D. M. (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 199-204.
44. Law, R. and Morton, R. D. (1996) Permanence and the assembly of ecological communities. Ecology 77, 762-775.
45. Law, R., Weatherby, A. J. and Warren, P. H. (2000) On the invasibility ofpersistent protist communities. Oikos 88, 319-326.
46. Lawler, S. P. (1998) Ecology in a bottle: using microcosms to test theory, pp. 236-253 In: Resetarits, W. J. and Bernado, J. (eds.) Experimental ecology: issues and perspectives. Oxford University Press, New York.
47. Levine, J. M. (2000) Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local processes to community patterns. Science 288, 852-854.
48. Levine, J. M. and D'Antonio, C. M. (1999) Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87, 15-26.
49. Lonsdale, W. M. (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80, 1522-1536.
50. Mack, R. N. (1996) Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. Biol. Conserv. 78, 107-121.
51. Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, M. W., Evans, EL, Clout, M. and Bazazz, F. A. (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Applic. 10, 689-710.
52. McGrady-Steed, J., Harris, P. M. and Morin, P. J. (1997) Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability. Nature 390, 163-165.
53. Mitchell, C. E. and Power, A. G. (2003) Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421, 625-627.
54. Parker, I. D., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Goodell, K., Wonham, M., Kareiva, P. M., Williamson, M. H., Von Holle, B., Moyle, P. B., Byers, J. E. and Goldwasser, L. (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol. Invasions 1, 3-19.
55. Petchey, O. L., McPhearson, P. T., Casey, T. M. and Morin, P. J. (1999) Environmental warming alters food web structure and ecosystem function. Nature 402, 69-72.
56. Petersen, J. E. and Hastings, A. (2001) Dimensional approaches to scaling experimental ecosystems: Designing mousetraps to catch elephants. Am. Nat. 157, 324-333.
57. Pimentel, D., Lach, L., Zuniga, R. and Morrison, D. (2000) Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience. 50, 53-65.
58. Pimm, S. L. (1989) Theories of predicting success and impact of introduced species. pp. 351-367 In: Drake, J. A., Mooney, H. A., di Casti, F., Groves, R. H., Kruger, F. J., Rejmanek, M. and Williamson, M (ed.) Biological invasions: a global perspective. SCOPE 3 7. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
59. Post, W. M. and Pimm, S. L. (1983) Community assembly and food web stability. Math. Biosci. 64, 169-192.
60. Rejmanek, M. (1989)Invasibility of plant communities. Ch. 16 pp. 369-388. In: Drake, J. A., Mooney, H. A., di Casti, F., Groves, R. H., Kruger, F.J., Rejmanek, M and Williamson, M. (ed.) Biological invasions: a global perspective. SCOPE 3 7. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
61. Robinson, J. V. and Dickerson J. E. (1984) Testing the invulnerability of laboratory island communities to invasion. Oecologia 61, 169-174.
62. Robinson, J. V. and Dickerson, J. E. (1987) Does invasion sequence affect community structure? Ecology 68, 587-595.
63. Robinson, J. V. and Edgemon, M. A. (1988) An experimental evaluation of the effect of invasion history on community structure. Ecology 69, 1410-1417.
64. Sakai, A. K., Allendorf, F. W., Holt, J. S., Lodge, D. M., Molofsky, J., With, K. A., Baughman, S., Cabin, R. J., Cohen, J. E., Ellstrand, N. C, McCauley, D. E., O'Neil, P., Parker, I. M., Thompson, J. N. and Weller, S. G. (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32, 305-332.
65. Shea, K. and Chesson, P. (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 170-176.
66. Shea, K. and Possingham, H. P. (2000) Optimal release strategies for biological control agents: an application ofstochastic dynamic programming to population management. J. Appl. Ecol. 37, 77-86.
67. Sher, A. A. and Hyatt, L. A. (1999) The disturbed resource-flux invasion matrix: a new framework for patterns of plant invasion. Biol. Invasions 1, 107-114.
68. Simberloff, D. (1981) Community effects of introduced species, pp. 53-83 In: Nitecki, M. H. (ed.) Biotic crises in ecological and evolutionary time. Academic Press, New York, USA.
69. Simberloff, D. (1989) Which insect introductions succeed and which fail? Ch. 3 pp. 61-75 In: Drake, J. A., Mooney, H. A., di Casti, F., Groves, R. H., Kruger, F. J., Rejmanek, M. and Williamson, M. (ed.) Biological invasions: a global perspective. SCOPE 3 7. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
70. Stampe, E. and Daehler, C. C. (2003) Mycorrhizal species identity affects plant community structure and invasion: a microcosm study. Oikos 100, 362-3 72.
71. Thompson, K., Hodgson, J. G. and Grime, J. P. and Burke M. J. W. (2001) Plant traits and temporal scale: evidence from a 5-year invasion experiment using native species. J. Ecol. 89, 1054-1060.
72. Torchin, M. E., Lafferty, K. D., Dobson, A. P., McKenzie, V. J. and Kuris, A. M. (2003) Introduced species and their missing parasites. Nature 421, 628-630.
73. Vitousek, P. M. and Walker, L. R. (1989) Biological invasion by Myrica faya in Hawaii: plant demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystem effects. Ecol. Monogr. 59, 247-265.
74. Wardle, D. A. (2001) Experimental demonstration that plant diversity reduces invasibility: Evidence of a biological mechanism or a consequence of sampling effect? Oikos 95, 161-170.
75. Warren, P. H. (1996) Dispersal and destruction in a multiple habitat system: and experimental approach using protist communities. Oikos 77, 317-325.
76. Warren, P. H., Law, R. and Weatherby, A. J. (2003) Mapping the assembly of protist communities in microcosms. Ecology 84, 1001-1011.
77. Weatherby, A. J. (2000) Species coexistence and community assembly in protist microcosms, unpublished PLD thesis. University of Sheffield, UK.
78. Weatherby, A. J., Warren, P. H. and Law, R. (1998) Coexistence and collapse: an experimental investigation of the persistent communities of a protist species pool. J. Anim. Ecol. 67, 554-566.
79. Weiher, E. and Keddy, P. (eds.) (1999) Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
80. Williamson, M. (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall London, England.
81. Zimmermann, C. R., Fukami, T. and Drake, J. A. (2003) An experimentally-derived map of community assembly space. In: Minai, A. and Bar-Yam, Y. (eds.) Unifying themes in complex systems II: Proceedings of the second international conference on complex systems. New England Complex Systems Institute. Perseus Press.