Gaze cues influence the allocation of attention in natural scene viewing

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2056-2064

  Langton, Stephen R H ^a   O'Donnell, Christopher ^b   Riby, Deborah M ^a   Ballantyne, Carrie J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; ENVIRONMENT; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

ATTENTION; CUES; ENVIRONMENT; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33750907184     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210600917884     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Angelone, B. L., Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (2003). The relationship between change detection and recognition of centrally attended objects in motion pictures. Perception, 32, 947-962.
2. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
3. Eastwood, J. D., Smilek, D., & Merikle, P. M. (2001). Differential guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1004-1013.
4. Fox, E., Lester, V., Russo, R., Bowles, R. J., Pichler, A., & Dutton, K. (2000). Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently? Cognition and Emotion, 14, 61-92.
5. Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it!: Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 490-495.
6. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 223-233.
7. Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 498-504.
8. Hollingworth, A. (2003). Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 388-403.
9. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 113-136.
10. Langton, S. R. H., & Bruce, V. (1999). Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others. Visual Cognition, 6, 541-567.
11. Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 501-506.
12. McConkie, G. W., & Currie, C. B. (1996). Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 563-581.
13. O'Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A., & Clarke, J. J. (1999). Change-blindness as a result of "mudsplashes". Nature, 398, 34.
14. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
15. Rensink, R. A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17-42.
16. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
17. Ro, T., Russell, C., & Lavie, N. (2001). Changing faces: A detection advantage in the flicker paradigm. Psychological Science, 12, 94-99.
18. Sadr, J., Jarudi, I., & Sinha, P. (2003). The role of eyebrows in face recognition. Perception, 32, 285-293.
19. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261-267.
20. Smilek, D., Birmingham, E., Cameron, D., Bischof, W., & Kingstone, A. (2006). Cognitive ethology and exploring attention in real-world scenes. Brain Research, 1080, 101-119.