-
1
-
-
0032538362
-
-
Lucet, D.; Gall, L.; Mioskowski, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2580.
-
(1998)
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
, vol.37
, pp. 2580
-
-
Lucet, D.1
Gall, L.2
Mioskowski, C.3
-
2
-
-
28444443366
-
-
(a) Kim, H.-J.; Kim, H.; Alhakimi, G.; Jeong, E. J.; Thavarajah, N.; Studnicki, L.; Koprianiuk, A.; Lough, A. J.; Suh, J.; and Chin, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16370.
-
(2005)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.127
, pp. 16370
-
-
Kim, H.-J.1
Kim, H.2
Alhakimi, G.3
Jeong, E.J.4
Thavarajah, N.5
Studnicki, L.6
Koprianiuk, A.7
Lough, A.J.8
Suh, J.9
Chin, J.10
-
3
-
-
28844457279
-
-
(b) Kim, H.-J.; Kim, W.; Lough, A. J.; Kim, B. M.; Chin, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16776.
-
(2005)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.127
, pp. 16776
-
-
Kim, H.-J.1
Kim, W.2
Lough, A.J.3
Kim, B.M.4
Chin, J.5
-
4
-
-
0000295576
-
-
Aldrich-Wright, J. R.; Vagg, R. S.; Williams, P. A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1997, 166, 361.
-
(1997)
Coord. Chem. Rev.
, vol.166
, pp. 361
-
-
Aldrich-Wright, J.R.1
Vagg, R.S.2
Williams, P.A.3
-
5
-
-
0003089611
-
-
(a) Fenton, R. R.; Stephens, F. S.; Vagg, R. S.; Williams, P. A. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1995, 236, 109.
-
(1995)
Inorg. Chim. Acta
, vol.236
, pp. 109
-
-
Fenton, R.R.1
Stephens, F.S.2
Vagg, R.S.3
Williams, P.A.4
-
6
-
-
0002468991
-
-
(b) Fenton, R. R.; Stephens, F. S.; Vagg, R. S.; Williams, P. A. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1991, 182, 67.
-
(1991)
Inorg. Chim. Acta
, vol.182
, pp. 67
-
-
Fenton, R.R.1
Stephens, F.S.2
Vagg, R.S.3
Williams, P.A.4
-
7
-
-
3242789479
-
-
(c) Emseis, P.; Hibbs, D. E.; Leverett, P.; Reddy, N.; Williams, P. A. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2004, 357, 3251.
-
(2004)
Inorg. Chim. Acta
, vol.357
, pp. 3251
-
-
Emseis, P.1
Hibbs, D.E.2
Leverett, P.3
Reddy, N.4
Williams, P.A.5
-
8
-
-
0037153844
-
-
Aldrich-Wright, J. R.; Fenton, R. F.; Greguric, I. D.; Hambley, T. W.; Williams, P. A. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2002, 4666.
-
(2002)
J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
, pp. 4666
-
-
Aldrich-Wright, J.R.1
Fenton, R.F.2
Greguric, I.D.3
Hambley, T.W.4
Williams, P.A.5
-
9
-
-
33750857185
-
-
note
-
2 = 1.014.
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
33750892743
-
-
note
-
In principle, the stereoselectivity may be due to counter anion or solvent effects or due to crystal packing. However, we find that the stereoselectivity does not change significantly when the solvent (methanol to dmso) or the counter anion (triflate to chloride or bromide) is changed. Since the sense of stereoselectivity in solution and in solid state is the same, crystal packing is unlikely to be a major factor in determining the stereoselectivity.
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
0034804120
-
-
(a) Costas, M.; Tipton, A. K.; Chen, K.; Jo, D.; Que, L., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6722.
-
(2001)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.123
, pp. 6722
-
-
Costas, M.1
Tipton, A.K.2
Chen, K.3
Jo, D.4
Que Jr., L.5
-
12
-
-
0037124676
-
-
(b) Costas, M.; Que, L., Jr. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2179.
-
(2002)
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
, vol.41
, pp. 2179
-
-
Costas, M.1
Que Jr., L.2
-
13
-
-
0037955666
-
-
(a) Murphy, A.; Dubois, G.; Stack, T. D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5250.
-
(2003)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.125
, pp. 5250
-
-
Murphy, A.1
Dubois, G.2
Stack, T.D.P.3
-
14
-
-
4544258386
-
-
(b) Murphy, A.; Pace, A.; Stack, T. D. P. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3119.
-
(2004)
Org. Lett.
, vol.6
, pp. 3119
-
-
Murphy, A.1
Pace, A.2
Stack, T.D.P.3
-
15
-
-
0344586205
-
-
(c) Schoumacker, S.; Hamelin, O.; Pécaut, J.; Fontecave, M. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 8110.
-
(2003)
Inorg. Chem.
, vol.42
, pp. 8110
-
-
Schoumacker, S.1
Hamelin, O.2
Pécaut, J.3
Fontecave, M.4
-
16
-
-
0002537121
-
-
Proudfoot, E. M.; Mackay, J. P.; Vagg, R. S.; Vickery, K. A.; Williams, P. A.; Karuso, P. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1623.
-
(1997)
Chem. Commun.
, pp. 1623
-
-
Proudfoot, E.M.1
Mackay, J.P.2
Vagg, R.S.3
Vickery, K.A.4
Williams, P.A.5
Karuso, P.6
-
17
-
-
33750849363
-
-
note
-
A small amount of the homochiral complex is visible in Figure 2b. This is because commercial (S,S)-dpen is contaminated with its enantiomer and the homochiral complex is more stable than the heterochiral complex. Although commercial (R,R)-dpen is also contaminated with its enantiomer, the heterochiral complex is not visible in Figure 2a because it is less stable than the homochiral complex. Figure 2c can also be generated with enantiopure host and racemic guest.
-
-
-
-
18
-
-
33750881760
-
-
note
-
Comparable selectivity is found when dmso is used as solvent instead of methanol.
-
-
-
-
19
-
-
18444403156
-
-
(a) Wang, D.; Fu, A.; He, J. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. E 2004, E60, m1915.
-
(2004)
Acta Crystallogr., Sect. E
, vol.E60
-
-
Wang, D.1
Fu, A.2
He, J.3
-
22
-
-
25444471909
-
-
Wavefunction, Inc.: Irving, CA
-
DFT computation was performed using Spartan '04 Windows; Wavefunction, Inc.: Irving, CA, 2004.
-
(2004)
Spartan '04 Windows
-
-
-
23
-
-
33750887642
-
-
note
-
Although the computations are used here for qualitative trends, the observed stereoselectivity (1.0 kcal/mol) for formation of the ternary complex in Figure 1 is in good agreement with the computed stereoselectivity (1.2 kcal/mol). Molecular mechanics and PM3 semiempirical computations also show the same trend (Supporting Information).
-
-
-
-
24
-
-
33750880721
-
-
note
-
1H NMR increases dramatically from the lowering of both levels of stereoselectivity.
-
-
-
|