Problems with forehead reflectance pulse oximetry

Respiratory Care

Volumn 51, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 715-716

  Barker, Steven J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTERIAL BLOOD; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD ANALYSIS; BLOOD SAMPLING; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; OXYGEN SATURATION; PEDIATRICS; PERFUSION; PULSE OXIMETER; PULSE OXIMETRY; RELIABILITY; RESPIRATORY CARE; SENSOR; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SURGICAL PATIENT; CHILD; FOREHEAD; INSTRUMENTATION; MONITORING; NOTE; OXIMETRY; TIME;

CHILD; FOREHEAD; HUMANS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; OXIMETRY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33750852546     PISSN: 00201324     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Berkenbosch JW, Tobias JD. Comparison of a new forehead reflectance pulse oximeter sensor with a conventional digit sensor in pediatric patients. Respir Care 2006;51(7):726-731.
2. Barker SJ, Le N, Hyatt J. Failure rates of transmission and reflectance pulse oximetry for various sensor sites. J Clin Monit 1991;7:102-103.
3. Barker SJ. A comparison of forehead and earlobe pulse oximeter sensors in the operating room. New York State Society of Anesthesiologists. 57th Postgraduate Assembly, New York; December 13, 2003.
4. Severinghaus JW, Naifeh KH, Koh SO. Errors in 14 pulse oximeters during profound hypoxia. J Clin Monit 1989;5(2):72-81.
5. Barker SJ. "Motion-resistant" pulse oximetry: a comparison of new and old models. Anesth Analg 2002;95(4):967-972.
6. Poets CF, Urschitz MS, Bohnhorst B. Pulse oximetry in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU): detection of hyperoxemia and false alarm rates. Anesth Analg 2002;94(1 Suppl):S41-S43.
7. Ogino MT. The advantages of a new technology pulse oximeter in neonatal care. Neonatal Intensive Care 2002;15(1):24-27.