Cultivating peer review

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1113-1115

  Dellavalle, Robert P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENTIALITY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; LETTER; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RESEARCH ETHICS;

AUTHORSHIP; CONFIDENTIALITY; DISSENT AND DISPUTES; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW; PUBLISHING; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;

EID: 33750845368     PISSN: 01909622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.05.015     Document Type: Letter

References (16)

1. Rennie D. Guarding the guardians: a conference on editorial peer review. JAMA 256 (1986) 2391-2392
2. Spier R. The history of the peer-review process. Trends Biotechnol 20 (2002) 357-358
3. Smith R. Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. J R Soc Med 99 (2006) 178-182
4. Altman L. For science's gatekeepers, a credibility gap. New York Times. May 2, 2006;Science Times section:1.
5. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Information for authors. Available from: URL:http://www.journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/ymjd/authorinfo. Accessed April 27, 2006.
6. McNutt R.A., Evans A.T., Fletcher R.H., and Fletcher S.W. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial. JAMA 263 (1990) 1371-1376
7. Evans A.T., McNutt R.A., Fletcher S.W., and Fletcher R.H. The characteristics of peer reviewers who produce good-quality reviews. J Gen Intern Med 8 (1993) 422-428
8. Ross J.S., Gross C.P., Desai M.M., Hong Y., Grant A.O., Daniels S.R., et al. Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. JAMA 295 (2006) 1675-1680
9. American Journal of Epidemiology. Instructions to authors. Available from: URL:http://www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/aje/for_authors/general.html. Accessed April 27, 2006.
10. American Sociological Review. Instructions to authors. Available from: URL:http://www2.asanet.org/journals/asr/submission.html. Accessed April 27, 2006.
11. Journal of Adolescent Health. Instructions to authors. Available from: URL:http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505765/authorinstructions. Accessed April 27, 2006.
12. Godlee F. Making reviewers visible: openness, accountability, and credit. JAMA 287 (2002) 2762-2765
13. Walsh E., Rooney M., Appleby L., and Wilkinson G. Open peer review: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 176 (2000) 47-51
14. BMJ. Our peer review process. Available from: URL:http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/advice/peer_review.shtml. Accessed April 27, 2006.
15. BMC dermatology publication and peer review processes. Available from: URL:http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcdermatol/ifora/#peerreview. Accessed April 27, 2006.
16. Jellinek N.J., Desousa R.A., and Bernhard J.D. The clinical influence of the JAAD. J Am Acad Dermatol 50 (2004) 470-474