The influence of operator changes on orthodontic treatment times and results in a postgraduate teaching environment

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 159-167

  McGuinness, Niall J ^a   McDonald, James P ^b  

^a Merlin Park University Hospital   (Ireland)

^b VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL STUDENT; EDUCATION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; MANPOWER; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PATIENT CARE; PEER REVIEW; STANDARD; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; DENTAL SERVICE, HOSPITAL; EPISODE OF CARE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; ORTHODONTICS; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STUDENTS, DENTAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0032038877     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/20.2.159     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. DeGuzman L, Bahiraei D, Vig K W, Vig P S, Weyant R J, O'Brien K 1995 The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion and treatment difficulty. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 107: 172-176
2. Fink D F, Smith R J 1992 The duration of orthodontic treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 102: 45-51
3. Fox N A 1993 The first 100 cases: a personal audit of orthodontic treatment assessed by the PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) Index. British Dental Journal 174: 290-297
4. Kelly B M 1994 An investigation into the treatment times and treatment standards in specialist orthodontic practice in the General Dental Service. MSc Thesis, University of London
5. Kelly B M, Springate S D 1996 Specialist orthodontics in the General Dental Service. British Dental Journal 180: 209-215
6. Kerr W J S, Buchanan I B, McNair F I, McColl J H 1994 Factors influencing the outcome and duration of removable appliance treatment. European Journal of Orthodontics 16: 181-186
7. McGuinness N J, Stephens C D 1993 Holograms and study models assessed by the PAR (Peer Assessment Rating) index of malocclusion - a pilot study. British Journal of Orthodontics 20: 123-129
8. McGuinness N J, Stephens C D 1994 An introduction to indices of malocclusion. Dental Update 21: 140-144.
9. O'Brien K, Shaw W C, Roberts C T 1993 The use of occlusal indices in assessing the provision of orthodontic treatment by the hospital orthodontic service of England and Wales. British Journal of Orthodontics 20: 25-35
10. Richmond S et al. 1992 The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. European Journal of Orthodontics 14: 125-139
11. Richmond S, Andrews M 1993 Orthodontic treatment standards in Norway. European Journal of Orthodontics 15: 7-15
12. Richmond S, Shaw, W C, Stephens C D, Webb W G, Roberts C T, Andrews M 1993 Orthodontics in the general dental services of England and Wales: a critical assessment of standards. British Dental Journal 174: 315-329
13. Shaw W C, Richmond S, O'Brien K, Brook P, Stephens C D 1991 Quality control in orthodontics: indices of orthodontic treatment need and treatment standards. British Dental Journal 170: 107-112