Theory-based categorization under speeded conditions

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1102-1111

  Luhmann, Christian C ^a,c   Ahn, Woo Kyoung ^b   Palmeri, Thomas J ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CATEGORIZATION; CAUSAL ATTRIBUTION; CONCEPT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KNOWLEDGE BASE; LEARNING; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; THEORY; TIME; UNITED STATES; VELOCITY;

EID: 33750817017     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193256     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. AHN, W.-K., KIM, N. S., LASSALINE, M. E., & DENNIS, M. J. (2000). Causal status as a determinant of feature centrality. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 361-416.
2. BARAFF, E., & COLEY, J. D. (2003, July). Thinking about music: Novice and expert inductive reasoning. Poster presented at the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston.
3. BLOOM, P. (1996). Intention, history, and artifact concepts. Cognition, 60, 1-29.
4. BROOKS, L. R., NORMAN, G. R., & ALLEN, S. W. (1991). The role of specific similarity in a medical diagnostic task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 278-287.
5. CHAIGNEAU, S. E., BARSALOU, L. W., & SLOMAN, S. A. (2004). Assessing the causal structure of function. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 601-625.
6. COLEY, J., SHAFTO, P., STEPANOVA, O., & BARAFF, E. (2005). Knowledge and category-based induction. In W.-K. Ahn, R. L. Goldstone, B. C. Love, A. B. Markman, & P. Wolff (Eds.), Categorization inside and outside the laboratory: Essays in honor of Douglas L. Medin (pp. 69-86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7. EGETH, H. E. (1966). Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 245-252.
8. GENTNER, D., & TOUPIN, C. (1986). Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science, 10, 277-300.
9. GLUCK, M. A., & BOWER, G. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 227-247.
10. GOLDSTONE, R. L., & MEDIN, D. L. (1994). Time course of comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 29-50.
11. JOHANSEN, M. K., & PALMERI, T. J. (2002). Are there representational shifts during category learning? Cognitive Psychology, 45, 482-553.
12. KAHNEMAN, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720.
13. KOEHLER, J. J. (1996). The base-rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 19, 1-53.
14. LAMBERTS, K. (1998). The time course of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 695-711.
15. LIN, E. L., & MURPHY, G. L. (1997). Effects of background knowledge on object categorization and part detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1153-1169.
16. LOVE, B. C., ROUDER, J. N., & WISNIEWSKI, E. J. (1999). A structural account of global and local processing. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 291-316.
17. MCRAE, K. (2005). Semantic memory: Some insights from feature-based connectionist attractor networks. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 45, pp. 41-86). San Diego: Academic Press.
18. MEDIN, D. L., & EDELSON, S. M. (1988). Problem structure and the use of base-rate information from experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 68-85.
19. MEDIN, D. L., & SHOBEN, E. J. (1988). Context and structure in conceptual combination. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 158-190.
20. MURPHY, G. L., & MEDIN, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316.
21. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 510-520.
22. PALMERI, T. J., & BLALOCK, C. (2000). The role of background knowledge in speeded perceptual categorization. Cognition, 77, B45-B57.
23. REHDER, B. (2003a). Categorization as causal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 27, 709-748.
24. REHDER, B. (2003b). A causal-model theory of conceptual representation and categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 1141-1159.
25. RIPS, L. J. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 21-59). New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. ROSCH, E., & MERVIS, C. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.
27. SLOMAN, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
28. SLOMAN, S. A., LOVE, B. C., & AHN, W. (1998). Feature centrality and conceptual coherence. Cognitive Science, 22, 189-228.
29. SMITH, E. E., & SLOMAN, S. A. (1994). Similarity- versus rule-based categorization. Memory & Cognition, 22, 377-386.
30. TVERSKY, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
31. WILLIAMS, P., & TARR, M. J. (n.d). RSVP: Experimental control software for Mac OS [Computer software]. Retrieved July 10, 2002, from www.tarrlab.org/.
32. WISNIEWSKI, E. J., & MEDIN, D. L. (1994). On the interaction of theory and data in concept learning. Cognitive Science, 18, 221-281.