Comment on J.U. Klügel's: Problems in the application of the SSHAC probability method for assessing earthquake hazards at Swiss nuclear power plants, in Engineering Geology, vol. 78, pp. 285-307

Engineering Geology

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 86-88

  Wang, Zhenming ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEISMIC HAZARD;

EID: 28944440405     PISSN: 00137952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.09.011     Document Type: Note

References (17)

1. C.A. Cornell Engineering seismic risk analysis Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 58 1968 1583-1606
2. C.A. Cornell Probabilistic analysis of damage to structures under seismic loads In: D.A. Howells I.P. Haigh C. Taylor (Eds.) Dynamic Waves in Civil Engineering: Proceedings of a Conference Organized by the Society for Earthquake and Civil Engineering Dynamics 1971 John Wiley New York 473-493
3. A. Frankel Comments on an article, "Should Memphis Build for California's Earthquakes?" EOS, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 84 2003 271-273
4. A. Frankel How can seismic hazard around the New Madrid Seismic Zone be similar to that in California? Seismological Research Letters 75 2004 575-586
5. Frankel, A., 2005, Reply to "Comment on 'How Can Seismic Hazard around the New Madrid Seismic Zone be similar to that in California? by Arthur Frankel," by Zhenming Wang, Baoping Shi, John D. Kiefer: Seismological Research Letters vol. 76, p. 472-475.
6. A. Frankel C. Mueller T. Barnhard D. Perkins E. Leyendecker N. Dickman S. Hanson M. Hopper National seismic hazard maps: Documentation June 1996 U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-532 1996 110 pp.
7. A.D. Frankel M.D. Petersen C.S. Mueller K.M. Haller R.L. Wheeler E.V. Leyendecker R.L. Wesson S.C. Harmsen C.H. Cramer D.M. Perkins K.S. Rukstales Documentation for the 2002 update of the national seismic hazard maps U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-420 2002 33 pp.
8. J.U. Klügel Problems in the application of the SSHAC probability method or assessing earthquake hazards at Swiss nuclear power plants Engineering Geology 78 2005 285-307
9. R.K. McGuire FORTRAN computer program for seismic risk analysis U.S. Geological Survey Open-File vol. 76-67 1976
10. R.K. McGuire Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: Closing the loop Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 85 1995 1275-1284
11. National Research Council (NRC) Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis, Report of the Panel on Seismic Hazard Analysis 1988 National Academy Press Washington, D.C. 97 pp.
12. L. Reiter When are ground motion estimates too high? Seismological Research Letters 74 2004 282
13. Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis Committee (SSHAC) Recommendations for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis: Guidance on Uncertainty and Use of Experts: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, NUREG/CR-6372 1997 81 pp.
14. Wang, Z., 2005, Reply to "comment on 'Comparison between probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and flood frequency analysis' by Zhenming Wang and Lindell Ormsbee" by T.L. Holzer: EOS, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, v. 86, p. 303.
15. Wang, Z. Ormsbee, L., 2005. Comparison between probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and flood frequency analysis: EOS, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, vol. 86, p. 45, 51-52.
16. Wang, Z., Woolery, E.W., Shi, B., Kiefer, J.D., 2003, Communicating with uncertainty: A critical issue with probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: EOS, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, vol. 84, p. 501, 506, 508.
17. Z. Wang E.W. Woolery B. Shi J.D. Kiefer Comment on "How Can Seismic Hazard around the New Madrid Seismic Zone Be Similar to that in California?" by Arthur Frankel Seismological Research Letters 76 2005 466-471