Bottom-up planning and the future of planning education in India

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 185-194

  Chettiparamb, Angelique ^a,b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Kerala Institute of Local Administration in Thrissur   (India)

Author keywords

Bottom up planning; India; Planning education

Indexed keywords

BOTTOM-UP APPROACH; EDUCATION POLICY; EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; PLANNING PRACTICE;

ASIA; EURASIA; INDIA; KERALA; SOUTH ASIA;

EID: 33750727324     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X06289239     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Acharya, Shravan Kumar. 2003. Globalization, human settlement and planning education in India. Conference paper presented at the 7th International Congress of Asian Planning Schools Association, 13 September, Hanoi.
2. Afshar, Farokh. 1990. Inequalities, Western roots and implementation problems: Three challenges to a one world planning education. In Breaking the boundaries-A one world approach to planning education, edited by B. Sanyal. New York: Plenum Press.
3. Amirahmadi, Hooshang. 1990. Incongruities between the theory and perception of regional development in less developed countries: Towards bridging the gap. In Breaking the boundaries-A one world approach to planning education, edited by B. Sanyal. New York: Plenum Press.
4. Beauregard, Robert A. 1998. Writing the planner. In Journal of Planning Education and Research 18: 93-101.
5. Beauregard, Robert A. 2001. The multiplicities of planning. In Journal of Planning Education and Research 20: 437-439.
6. Booher, Davide E., and Judith E. Innes. 2002. Network power in collaborative planning. In Journal of Planning Education and Research 21: 221-236.
7. Chathukulam, Jos, and M. S. John. 2002. Five years of participa-tory planning in Kerala - Rhetoric and reality. In Economic and Political Weekly, 7 December: 4, 917-926.
8. Chettiparamb, Angelique. 1999. Proceedings of "Learning by Doing" workshop on district spatial plan - Trichur. Trichur, India: Kerala Institute of Local Administration.
9. Chettiparamb, Angelique. 2005a. Fractal spaces in planning and governance. Town Planning Review 76 (3): 317-340.
10. Chettiparamb, Angelique. 2005b. Re-conceptualising public participation in planning - A view through autopoieisis. Paper presented in the AESOP conference in Vienna, 13-17 July 2005.
11. Chettiparamb, Angelique. 2005c. Complexity theory and planning - Methodological implications. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, School of City and Regional Planning, Cardiff University, United Kingdom.
12. Committee on Decentralisation of Powers. 1997. Final Report. Government of Kerala.
13. Economic Review. 2001. Trivandrum, Kerala: Kerala State Planning Board.
14. Economic Review. 2002. Trivandrum, Kerala: Kerala State Planning Board.
15. Economic Review. 2003. Trivandrum, Kerala: Kerala State Planning Board.
16. Economic Review. 2004. Trivandrum, Kerala: Kerala State Planning Board.
17. Edelenbos, J., and M. van Eeten. 2001. The missing link: Processing variation in dialogical evaluation. Evaluation 7 (2): 204-210.
18. Forester, John. 1989. Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19. Friedmann, John. 1993. Toward a non-Euclidean mode of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 59 (4): 482-485.
20. Friedmann, John. 1995. Teaching planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14 (3): 156-162.
21. Friedmann, John. 1998. The new political economy of planning: The rise of civil society. In Cities for citizens, edited by M. Douglass and J. Friedmann. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
22. Friedmann, John, and Carol Kuester. 1994. Planning education for the late twentieth century: An initial inquiry. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14 (1): 55-64.
23. Fuentes, C. 1982. Writing in time. Democracy 2 (1): 61-74.
24. Harper, Thomas L., and Stanley M. Stein. 1995. Out of the post-modern abyss: Preserving the rationale for liberal planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14: 233-244.
25. Harris, Neil. 1999. Working away from home: Philosophical understanding in the development of planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19: 93-97.
26. Healey, Patsy. 1980. The development of planning education in the UK and its relevance as a model for other countries. Ekistics 285 (November/ December): 416-420.
27. Healey, Patsy. 1996. The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. In Environment and Planning B 23: 217-234.
28. Innes, Judith E., and David E. Booher. 1999. Consensus building and complex adaptive systems - A framework for evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 65 (4): 412-423.
29. Isaac, Thomas T. M., and Richard W. Franke. 2000. Local democracy and development-People's planning for decentralized planning in Kerala. India: Left Word.
30. Jessop, Bob. 2003. Governance and metagovernance: On reflexivity, requisite variety, and requisite irony. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University, Department of Sociology. Retrieved 30 January 2006 from http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/sociology/papers/ jessop-governance-and-metagovernance.pdf.
31. The Kerala Municipality Act and Rules. 2004. Kochi, India: Em Tee En Publications.
32. The Kerala Panchayat Law Manual. 2004. Kochi, India: Em Tee En Publications.
33. Muller, John. 1992. From survey to strategy: Twentieth century developments in Western planning method. Planning Perspectives 7: 125-155
34. Qadeer, Mohammed A. 1990. External precepts and internal views: The dialectic of reciprocal learning in Third World urban planning. In Breaking the boundaries - A one world approach to planning education, edited by B. Sanyal. New York: Plenum Press.
35. Samyojitha Jilla Padhathi - Ernakulam Jilla. 2002. Jilla Aasoothrana Samiti, Ernakulam (Malayalam) Integrated District Plan-Ernakulam (2002) District Planning Committee, Ernakulam.
36. Sandercock, Leonie. 1995. Voices from the borderlands: A mediation on a metaphor. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14: 77-88.
37. Sandercock, Leonie. 2000. Towards cosmopolis. Chichester: John Wiley.
38. Sanyal, Bishwapriya. 1990. Large commitments to large objectives: Planning education for the twenty-first century. In Breaking the boundaries - A one world approach to planning education, edited by B. Sanyal. New York: Plenum Press.
39. Sharma, Rashmi. 2003. Kerala's decentralisation - Idea in practice. Economic and Political Weekly 6 September: 3, 832-850.
40. Thomas, Huw, and Francesco Lo Piccolo. 2004. Research ethics and planning: A framework for discussion. Conference paper presented at the AESOP 2004 Congress, 3 July, Grenoble.
41. Zetter, Roger. 1980. Imported or indigenous planning education: Some observations on the needs of developing countries. Ekistics 285 (November/December): 410-415.