Working Away From Home: Philosophical Understanding in the Development of Planning Theory

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 93-97

  Harris, Neil ^a  

^a Cardtff Unzverszty ^*  (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84990350895     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9901900109     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alexander, E.R. 1984. After rationality, what? A review of responses to paradigm breakdown. Journal of the American Planning Association 50(1) 62-69.
2. Allen, J. 1996. Our town: Foucault and knowledge-based politics in London. In Explorations in Planning Theory, eds. S.J. Mandelbaum, L. Mazza, and R.W. Burchell, 328-344. New Brunswick, N.J.: Center for Urban Policy Research.
3. Bolan, R.S. 1980. The practitioner as theorist: The phenomenology of the professional episode. Journal of the American Planning Association 46(3):261-274.
4. Brown, A. 1994. Being a researcher. In Studies in Qualitative Methodology Issues in Qualitative Research. Vol. 4, ed. R. Burgess, 29-51. London, U.K.: JAI Press.
5. Campbell, S., and S. Falllstelll, eds. 1996. Readings in Planning Theory. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
6. Davidoff, P. 1965. Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31(4):331-338.
7. Flyvbjerg, B. 1998. Empowering civil society: Habermas, Foucault and the question of conflict. In Cities for Citizens: Planning and the Rise of Civil Society in a Global Age, eds. M. Douglass and J. Friedmann, 185-211. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons.
8. Flyvbjerg, B., and T. Richardson. 1998. In Search of the Dark Side of Planning Theory. Paper presented to the Oxford Brookes Planning Theory Conference, Oxford, England. 2-4 April 1998.
9. Forester, J. 1980. Critical theory and planning practice. Journal of the American Planning Association 46(3):275-286.
10. Forester, J. 1989. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.
11. Forester, J. 1990. Reply to my critics. Planning Theory Newsletter 4:43-60.
12. Forester, J. 1993. Critical Theory, Public Policy and Planning Practice. Toward a Critical Pragmatism. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
13. Forester, J. 1998. Rationality, dialogue, and learning. What community and environmental mediators can teach us about the practice of planning. In Cities for Citizens. Planning and the Rise of Civil Society in a Global Age, eds. M. Douglass, and J. Friedmann, 213-225. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons.
14. Friedmann, J. 1996. Two centuries of planning theory: An overview. In Explorations in Planning Theory, eds. S.J. Mandelbaum, L. Mazza, and R.W. Burchell, 10-29. New Brunswick, N.J.: Center for Urban Policy Research.
15. Friedmann, J., and M. Douglass, 1998. Editors' introduction. In Cities for Citizens. Planning and the Rise of Civil Society in a Global Age, eds. M. Douglass and J. Friedmann, 1-6. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons.
16. Giddens, A. 1985. Reason without revolution? Habermas's Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. In Habermas and Modernity, ed. R.J. Brenstein, 95-121. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press in association with Basil Blackwell, London.
17. Graham, E. 1997. Philosophies underlying human geography research. In Methods in Human Geography: A Guide for Students Doing Research Projects, eds. R. Flowerdew and D. Martin, 6-30. Harlow, U.K.: Longman.
18. Habermas, J. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Translated by Thomas McCarthy Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press.
19. Habermas, J. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Translated by Thomas McCarthy Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press.
20. Hillier, J. 1993. To boldly go where no planners have ever. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 11(1):89-113.
21. Hoch, C. 1996. A pragmatic inquiry about planning and power. In Explorations in Planning Theory, eds. S.J. Mandelbaum, L. Mazza, and R.W. Burchell, 30-44. New Brunswick, N.J.: Center for Urban Policy Research.
22. Innes de Neufville, J. 1983. Planning theory and practice: Bridging the gap. Journal of Planning Education and Research 3(1):35-45.
23. Mandelbaum, S.J. 1996. Introduction. In Explorations in Planning Theory, eds. S.J. Mandelbaum, L. Mazza, and R.W. Burchell, xi-xix. New Brunswick, N.J.: Center for Urban Policy Research.
24. Mandelbaum, S.J., L. Mazza, and R.W. Burchell, eds. 1996. Explorations in Planning Theory. New Brunswick, N.J.: Center for Urban Policy Research.
25. McLoughlin, J.B. 1987. Studying planning in practice. An expedition to an academic outback. Australian Planner 25(4):9-13.
26. Milroy, B.M. 1990. Critical capacity and planning theory. Planning Theory Newsletter 4:12-18.
27. Poulton, M.C. 1991. The case for a positive theory of planning. Part 1: What is wrong with planning theory? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 18(2):225-232.
28. Richardson, T. 1996. Foucauldian discourse: Power and truth in urban and regional policy making. European Planning Studies 4(3):279-292.
29. Sager, T. 1993. Paradigms for planning: A rationality-based classification. Planning Theory Newsletter 9:70-118.
30. Sager, T. 1994. Communicative Planning Theory. Aldershot, U.K.: Avebury.
31. Taylor, N. 1994. Environmental issues and the public interest. In Values and Planning, ed. H. Thomas, 87-115. Aldershot, U.K.: Avebury.
32. Taylor, N. 1998. Urban Planning Theory since 1945. London: Sage.
33. Teitz, M.B. 1996. American planning in the 1990s: Evolution, debate and challenge. Urban Studies 33(4/5):649-671.