Minimally invasive randomization for collecting unbiased preferences from clickthrough logs

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 1406-1412

  Radlinski, Filip ^a   Joachims, Thorsten ^a  

^a Department of Computer Science and School of Operations Research and Information Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLICKTHROUGH LOGS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE RANDOMIZATION; PERSONALIZING SEARCH ENGINES;

FEEDBACK; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; PERSONNEL TRAINING; SEARCH ENGINES;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 33750724722     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Chu, W., and Keerthi, S. S. 2005. New approaches to support vector ordinal regression. In Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
2. Cohen, W. W.; Shapire, R. E.; and Singer, Y. 1999. Learning to order things. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 10:243-270.
3. Crammer, K., and Singer, Y. 2001. Pranking with ranking. In Proceedings of the conference on Neural Information Processing System (NIPS).
4. Fox, S.; Karnawat, K.; Mydland, M.; Dumais, S.; and White, T. 2005. Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM Transations on Information Systems 23(2): 147-168.
5. Freund, Y.; Iyer, R.; Schapire, R. E.; and Singer, Y. 1998. An efficient boosting algorithm for combining preferences. In Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
6. Granka, L.; Joachims, T.; and Gay, G. 2004. Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in www search. In Poster Abstract, Proceedings of the Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR).
7. Granka, L. 2004. Eye tracking analysis of user behaviors in online search. Master's thesis, Cornell University.
8. Herbrich, R.; Graepel, T.; and Obermayer, K. 2000. Large margin rank boundaries for ordinal regression. In et al., A. S., ed., Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, 115-132.
9. Hinkelmann, K., and Kempthorne, O. 1994. Design and Analysis of Experiments: Volume 1: Introduction to Experimental Design. John Wiley & Sons.
10. Joachims, T.; Granka, L.; Pang, B.; Hembrooke, H.; and Gay, G. 2005. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR).
11. Joachims, T. 2002. Optimizing search engines using click-through data. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD).
12. Kelly, D., and Teevan, J. 2003. Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: A bibliography. SIGIR Forum 32(2).
13. Kemp, C., and Ramamohanarao, K. 2002. Long-term learning for web search engines. In Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Principles and Pratice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (PKDD), 263-274.
14. Miller, C. S., and Remington, R. W. 2004. Modeling information navigation: Implications for information architecture. Human-Computer Interaction 19:225-271.
15. Radlinski, F., and Joachims, T. 2005. Query chains: Learning to rank from implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD).
16. Teevan, J.; Dumais, S. T.; and Horvitz, E. 2005. Beyond the commons: Inversitating the value of personalizing web search. In Workshop on New Technologies for Personalized Information Access (PIA 2005).
17. Voorhees, E. M. 2004. Overview of TREC 2004. In Proceedings of the 13th Text REtrieval Conference.
18. White, R. W.; Ruthven, I.; and Jose, J. M. 2005. A study of factors affecting the utility of implicit relevance feedback. In Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR).
19. Yu, S.; Yu, K.; and Tresp, V. 2005. Collaborative ordinal regression. In Proceedings of the NIPS 2005 Workshop on Learning to Rank.