Long-term learning for web search engines

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2431, Issue , 2002, Pages 263-274

  Kemp, Charles ^a   Ramamohanarao, Kotagiri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; SEARCH ENGINES; WEBSITES;

DOCUMENT TRANSFORMATION; LONG-TERM LEARNING; RETRIEVAL PERFORMANCE; RIGOROUS EVALUATION; SUCCESSFUL SEARCH; TEST COLLECTION;

WORLD WIDE WEB; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 84864860474     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45681-3_22     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Vo Ngoc Anh and Alistair Moffat. Improved retrieval effectiveness through impact transformation.In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Australasian Database Conference, Melbourne, Australia, in press. 268
2. Doug Beeferman and Adam Berger. Agglomerative clustering of a search engine query log.In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 407-416, Boston, 2000.ACM Press. 271
3. Richard K. Belew. Adaptive information retrieval: Using a connectionist representation to retrieve and learn about documents.In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 11-20, Cambridge, MA, 1989.ACM Press. 264
4. Justin Boyan, Dayne Freitag, and Thorsten Joachims. A machine learning architecture for optimizing web search engines.In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Internet-Based Information Systems.1996. 264
5. T. Brauen. Document vector modification.In Gerard Salton, editor, The SMART Retrieval System : Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, pages 456-484. Prentice Hall, NJ, 1971. 265, 266, 267, 268, 269
6. Chris Buckley.Implementation of the SMART information retrieval system.Technical Report 85-686, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1985. 269
7. Chris Buckley and Ellen M. Voorhees. Evaluating evaluation measure stability. In Proceedings of the Twenty Third Annual International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 33-40, Athens, Greece, 2000.ACM Press. 268
8. Hsinchun Chen. Machine learning for information retrieval: Neural networks, symbolic learning, and genetic algorithms. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 46(3):194-216, 1995. 264
9. The Direct Hit popularity engine technology: A white paper, 1999. Available from www.directhit.com/about/products/technology-whitepaper.html. 263
10. S. Friedman, J. Maceyak, and S. Weiss. A relevance feedback system based on document transformations.In Gerard Salton, editor, The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, pages 447-455.Prentice Hall, NJ, 1971. 265
11. Norbert Fuhr and Chris Buckley. A probabilistic learning approach for document indexing. Information Systems, 9(3):223-248, 1991. 264
12. M. Gordon. Probabilistic and genetic algorithms for document retrieval. Communications of the ACM, 31(10):1208-1218, 1988. 264
13. B. Jansen, A.Spink, J. Bateman, and T. Saracevic. Real life information retrieval: A study of user queries on the web. SIGIR Forum, 32(1):5-17, 1998. 271
14. K. L. Kwok. A neural network for probabilistic information retrieval. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 21-30, Cambridge, MA, 1989. 264
15. David D. Lewis.Learning in intelligent information retrieval.In Lawrence A. Birnbaum and Gregg C.Collins, editors, Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop, pages 235-239, Evanston, IL, 1991.Morgan Kaufmann. 264
16. M. Maron and J. Kuhns. On relevance, probabilistic indexing and information retrieval. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 7(3):216-244, July 1960. 265
17. Benjamin Piwowarski. Learning in information retrieval: a probabilistic differential approach.In Proceedings of the Twenty Second Annual Colloquium on Information Retrieval Research, Cambridge, England, April 2000. 264
18. J. Rocchio, Jr. Relevance feedback in information retrieval.In Gerard Salton, editor, The SMART Retrieval System : Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, pages 313-323.Prentice Hall, 1971. 265
19. Gerard Salton. Automatic text processing: the transformation, analysis, and retrieval of information by computer.Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1989. 264
20. J. Savoy and D. Vrajitoru. Evaluation of learning schemes used in information retrieval. Technical Report CR-I-95-02, Faculty of Sciences, University of Neuchâtel, 1996. 266, 267, 268, 269
21. Craig Silverstein, Monika Henzinger, Hannes Marais, and Michael Moricz. Analysis of a very large AltaVista query log.Technical Report 1998-014, Systems Research Center, Digital Equipment Corporation, Palo Alto, California, October 1998. 271
22. Ami t Singhal, Chris Buckley, and Mandar Mitra. Pivoted document length normalization. In H-P Frei, D.Harman, and P.Schäuble, editors, Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 21-29, New York, 1996.ACM Press. 265
23. Karen Sparck Jones. Automatic indexing. Journal of Documentation, 30:393-432, 1974. 271
24. Justin Zobel and Alistair Moffat. Exploring the similarity space. SIGIR Forum, 32(1):18-34, 1998. 264, 265