The value of a structured planning practicum program: Insights from experience

Australian Planner

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 74-82

  Coiacetto, Eddo ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750721394     PISSN: 07293682     EISSN: 21506841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07293682.2004.9982357     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baum, H. 1997. ‘Teaching practice’. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17(1): 21–28.
2. Baum, H. 1996. ‘Why the rational paradigm persists: Tales from the field’. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 15(2): 127–134.
3. Bolan, R. 1980. ‘The practitioner as theorist’. APA Journal, 46(3): 261–274.
4. Brooks, KR, Nocks, BC, Farris, JT, and Cunningham, MG. 2002. ‘Teaching for practice: Implementing a process to integrate work experience in an MCRP curriculum’. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(2): 188–200.
5. Campbell-Evans, G, and Maloney, C. 1997. ‘An alternative Practicum curriculum: Exploring roles and relationships’. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 25(1): 35–52.
6. Gunder, M. 2002. “Bridging theory and practice in planning education: A story from Auckland’. Australian Planner, 39(4): 202–206.
7. Hillier, J. 1995. ‘The unwritten law of planning: Common sense’. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(4): 292–296.
8. Hoch, C. 1994. “ ‘The rational protocol and political conflict’ ”. In What Planners Do: Power politics and persuasion, Edited by: Hoch, C. 45–74. Chicago: American Planning Association.
9. Hughes, C. 1998. ‘Practicum learning: Perils of the authentic workplace’. Higher Education Research and Development, 17(2): 207–227.
10. Innes, J. 1995. ‘Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice’. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(3): 183–188.
11. Minnery, J. 2000. ‘"Go, and do thou likewise”: Planning practice in planning education’. Australian Planner, 37(1): 39–46.
12. Royal Australian Planning Institute. 1999. “ ‘Code of Professional Conduct’ ”. In Member Handbook 12–15.
13. Ryan, G, Toohey, S, and Hughes, C. 1996. The purpose, value and structure of the Practicum in higher education: A literature review’. Higher Education, 31(3): 355–377.
14. Sandercock, L. 1997. ‘The planner TAMED’. Australian Planner, 34(2): 90–95.
15. Sandercock, L. 1999. ‘Boys in market space, girl from outer space? A rejoinder to Sorensen and Auster’. Australian Planner, 36(4): 223–225.
16. Schon, D. 1987. Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions, San Francisco: Josey–Bass.
17. Schön, D. 1983. The reflective practitioner, NY: Basic Books.
18. Schon, D. 1982. “Some of what a planner knows: A case study of knowing in practice’. APA Journal., 48(3): 351–364.
19. Sorensen, T, and Auster, A. 1999a. Theory and practice in planning: Further apart than ever?’. Australian Planner, 36(3): 146–149.
20. Sorensen, T, and Auster, A. 1999b. ‘Boys in market space, girl from outer space? A rejoinder’. Australian Planner, 36(4): 226–227.
21. Watson, V. 2002. ‘Do we learn from planning practice? The contribution of the practice movement to planning theory’. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(2): 178–187.