Bridging theory and practice in planning: A story from Auckland

Australian Planner

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 202-206

  Gunder, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2942545077     PISSN: 07293682     EISSN: 21506841     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07293682.2002.9982320     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alexander, TM. 1995. “ ‘Educating the Democratic Heart,’ ”. In The New Scholarship on Dewey, Edited by: Garrison, J. 75–91. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Alexander, ER. 2000. ‘Rationality Revisited: Planning Paradigms in a Post‐Postmodernist Perspective’. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19: 242–256.
3. Allmendinger, P. 2001. Planning in Postmodern Times, London: Routledge.
4. Baum, H. 1997. ‘Teaching Practice,’. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17: 21–29.
5. Bourdieu, P. 1998. Practical Reason, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
6. Derrida, J. 1976. Of Grammatology, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7. Dreyfus, H. 1995. “ ‘Heidegger on Gaining a Free Relation to Technology,’ ”. In Technology and the Politics of Knowledge, 99–107. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
8. Flyvbjerg, B. 1992. ‘Aristotle, Foucault and Progressive Phronesis: Outline of an Applied Ethics for Sustainable Development’. Planning Theory, 7/8: 65–83.
9. Flyvbjerg, B. 1998. Rationality & Power, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
10. Flyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making Social Science Matter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Forester, J. 1995. “ ‘The Rationality of Listening, Emotional Sensitivity, and Moral Vision,’ ”. In Explorations in Planning Theory, 204–224. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers.
12. Foucault, M. 1973. The Birth of the Clinic, London: Tavistock.
13. Foucault, M. 1997. “ ‘What is Enlightenment?’ ”. In Michel Foucault Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, 303–320. London: Penquin.
14. Friedmann, J. 1987. Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action, NJ: Princeton University Press, Princeton.
15. Gunder, M. 1998a. ‘Planning Beyond the Fetish of Modem Ideology,’. Australian Planner, 35(2): 68–76.
16. Gunder, M. ‘Teaching Planning as Ethical Action,’. Australian & New Zealand Association of Planning Schools Annual Conference Proceedings. July3–51998, Brisbane, Australia. pp. 31–40. The University of Queensland & Griffith University.
17. Gunder, M. 2000a. “ ‘Urban policy formation under efficiency: The case of Auckland City Councils’ Britomart project,’ ”. In Environmental Planning & Management in New Zealand, 294–308. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
18. Gunder, M. ‘Do We Risk Obscuring the Good Through Teaching Effective and Efficient 21st Century Planning Process?’. Proceedings of the 2000 Meeting of Australian and New Zealand Planning Schools. Palmerston North. pp. 21–30. Massey University.
19. Gunder, M, and Mouat, C. 2002. ‘Symbolic Violence and Victimisation in Planning Processes: A Reconnoitre of the New Zealand Resource Management Act’. Planning Theory, 1(2): 125–146.
20. Habermas, J. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, Boston: Beacon Press.
21. Harvey, D. 1995. “ ‘The Environment of Justice,’ ”. In The Urbanization of Injustice, 65–99. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
22. Harris, N. 2000. ‘Practice Through a Lens: A Metaphor for Planning Theory,’. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(3): 309–315.
23. Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, London: MacMillan.
24. Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and Time, London: SCM Press. orig. 1927
25. Heidegger, M. 1977. “ ‘The Question Concerning Technology,‘ ”. In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, 3–35. New York: Garland.
26. Hillier, J. 1995. ‘The Unwritten Law of Planning Theory: Common Sense,’. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(4): 292–296.
27. Hillier, J. 1997. “ ‘Foucault's Gaze’ ”. In Foucault the Legacy, 139–154. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
28. Hillier, J. 2002. Shadows of Power: An Allegory of Prudence in Land Use Planning, London: Routledge.
29. Kant, I. 1990. “ ‘What is Enlightenment,’ ”. In Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals and What is Enlightenment, 83–90. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers.
30. Lacan, J. 1977. Écrits: A Selection, NY: Norton.
31. MacIntyre, A. 1990. Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
32. Ozawa, C, and Seltzer, E. 1999. Taking Our Bearings: Mapping a Relationship Among Planning Practice. Theory, and Education,‘ Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18: 257–266.
33. Pløger, J. 2001. ‘Public participation and the art of governance’. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28: 219–241.
34. Reed, ES. 1996. The Necessity of Experience, London: Yale University Press.
35. Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, NY: Cambridge University Press.
36. Sager, T. 1994. Communicative Planning Theory, Aldershot: Avebury.
37. Sandercock, L. 1995. ‘Voices from the Borderlands: A Mediation on a Metaphor,’. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14: 77–88.
38. Sandercock, L. 1999. ‘A Portrait of Postmodern Planning: Anti‐Hero and/or Passionate Pilgrim?’. Plan Canada, 39(2): 12–15.
39. Schön, DA. 1988. Educating the Reflective Practitioner, London: Jossey‐Bass.
40. Singer, P. 1997. Hegel, German Philosophers, 105–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Smith, GB. 1996. Nietzsche, Heidegger and the Transition to Postmodernity, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
42. Yiftachel, O. 1998. ‘Planning and Social Control: Exploring the Dark Side,’. Journal of Planning Literature, 12(4): 395–406.