Motion-based autonomous grounding: Inferring external world properties from encoded internal sensory states alone

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 936-941

  Choe, Yoonsuck ^a   Smith, Noah H ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL AGENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL STIMULI; NATURAL IMAGES; SEMANTIC GROUNDING;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; BRAIN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INVARIANCE; SEMANTICS; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 33750711361     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Arbib, M. A. 2003. Schema theory. In Arbib, M. A., ed., The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2nd edition. 993-998.
2. Bowling, M.; Ghodsi, A.; and Wilkinson, D. 2005. Action respecting embedding. In Proc. of the 22nd Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, 65-72.
3. Brooks, R. A. 1991. Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 47:139-159.
4. Cassandra, A. R.; Kaelbling, L. P.; and Littman, M. L. 1994. Acting optimally in partially observable stochastic domains. In Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1023-1028. AAAI Press.
5. Choe, Y., and Bhamidipati, S. K. 2004. Autonomous acquisition of the meaning of sensory states through sensory-invariance driven action. In Ijspeert, A. J.; Murata, M.; and Wakamiya, N., eds., Biologically Inspired Approaches to Advanced Information Technology, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3141, 176-188. Berlin: Springer.
6. Cohen, P. R., and Beal, C. R. 1999. Natural semantics for a mobile robot. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Science.
7. Daw, N. 1995. Visual Development. New York: Plenum.
8. Edelman, S. 1999. Representation and Recognition in Vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Freeman, W. J. 1999. How Brains Make Up Their Minds.
10. London, UK: Wiedenfeld and Nicolson Ltd. Reprinted by Columbia University Press (2001).
11. Harnad, S. 1990. The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42:335-346.
12. Lashley, K. S. 1951. The problem of serial order in behavior. In Jeffress, L. A., ed., Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior. New York: Wiley. 112-146.
13. Llinás, R. R. 2001. I of the Vortex. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Marder, E., and Calabrese, R. L. 1996. Principles of rhythmic motor pattern production. Physiological Reviews 76:687-717.
15. Misra, N. 2005. Comparison of motor-based versus visual representations in object recognition tasks. Master's thesis, Department of Computer Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
16. Mitchell, T. M. 1997. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill.
17. O'Regan, J. K., and Noë, A. 2001. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(5):883-917.
18. Philipona, D.; O'Regan, J. K.; Nadal, J.-P.; and Coenen, O. J.-M. D. 2004. Perception of the structure of the physical world using unknown multimodal sensors and effectors. In Thrun, S.; Saul, L.; and Schölkopf, B., eds., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16, 945-952. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Philipona, D.; O'Regan, J. K.; and Nadal, J.-P. 2003. Is there something out there? Inferring space from sensorimotor dependencies. Neural Computation 15:2029-2050.
20. Pierce, D. M., and Kuipers, B. J. 1997. Map learning with uninterpreted sensors and effectors. Artificial Intelligence 92:162-227.
21. Rizzolatti, G.; Fadiga, L.; Gallese, V.; and Fogassi, L. 1996. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor neurons. Cognitive Brain Research 3:131-141.
22. Watkins, C. J. C. H., and Dayan, P. 1992. Q-learning. Machine Learning 8(3):279-292.
23. Weng, J. 2004. Developmental robotics: Theory and experiments. Int. J. of Humanoid Robotics 1:199-236.
24. Yuste, R.; MacLean, J. N.; Smith, J.; and Lansner, A. 2005. The cortex as a central pattern generator. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 2:477-483.