Telemedicine in veterinary practice

Journal of the South African Veterinary Association

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 75-78

  Mars, M ^a   Auer, R E J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Animal; E mail; Telecare; Telemedicine; Videoconferencing

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ANIMAL CARE; COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONSULTATION; DATA BASE; DATA STORAGE DEVICE; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDLINE; PEER REVIEW; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TELEMEDICINE; VALIDITY; VETERINARY MEDICINE; WEB BROWSER;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 33750705956     PISSN: 10199128     EISSN: 22249435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4102/jsava.v77i2.348     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Anonymous 2005 Livestock Health and Production Review 8: 11-13
2. Boydell P 2000 IT and the changing face of referral work. In Practice 22: 280-281
3. Boydell P 2000 Telemedicine - a vision of the future. In Practice 22: 409-413
4. Brauchli K, O'Mahony D, Banach L, Oberholzer M 2005 iPath - A telemedicine platform to support health providers in low resource settings. Studies In Health Technology and Informatics 114: 11-17
5. Campbell W E 1996 Collecting, archiving, and sharing of digitized medical information. Seminars Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (Small Animals) 11: 93-95
6. Cook C, Murdoch L Kennedy C, Taylor P, Johnson K, Godoumov R 2004 Teleophthalmology and Vision 2020 in South Africa. South African Medical Journal 94: 750-751
7. Corr P 1998 Teleradiology in KwaZulu-Natal. A pilot project. South African Medical Journal 88: 48-49
8. Corr P, Couper I, Beningfield S J, Mars M 2000 A simple telernedicine system using a digital camera. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 6: 233-236
9. Dodman N H, Smith A, Holmes D 2005 Comparison of the efficacy of remote consultations and personal consultations for the treatinent of dogs which are aggressive towards their owners. The Veterinary Record 156: 168-170
10. Gulube S M, Wynchank S 2001 Telemedicine in South Africa: success or failure? Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 7, Suppl. 2: 47-49
11. Hebert P, Latouche J S, Menard M, Papageorges M 2001 Telecytology. Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice 16: 122-124
12. Jack D C 1999 The legal implications of veterinary telemedicine and telecare. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 5, Suppl. 1: S80-S84
13. Jithoo R, Govender P V, Corr P, Nathoo N 2003 Telemedicine and neurosurgery: experience of a regional unit based in South Africa. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 9: 63-66
14. Jochman-Edwards C M, Tilley L P Lichtenberger M, Smith F W K, Kirby R 2002 Electrocardiographic findings in miniature schnauzers with syncope. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care 12: 253-259
15. Kodama M 2000 Creating New Services based on the formation of a strategic community with customers: a case study of innovation involving IT and multimedia technology in the field of veterinary medicine. Creativity and Innovation Management 9: 171-184
16. Leung D 1999 Apropos telemedicine. Canadian Veterinary Journal 40: 318-320
17. Marr C M 2001 Advances in equine ultrasonography. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 17: 305-317
18. Martinelli M 2001 Digital imaging advances and the future. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 17: 275-295
19. Papageorges M 2001 Regulations and other issues. Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice 16: 127-129
20. Papageorges M 2001 Veterinary telemedicine. Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice 16: 87-89
21. Papageorges M, Hanson J, Girard E 1998 Telesonography may solve ultrasonography dilemma. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 212: 948
22. Papageorges M, Hanson J, Girard E, Leveille R 2001 Teleradiology. Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice 16: 115-116
23. Papageorges M, Hanson J, Girard E, Leveille R, Hebert P Latouche J S, Menard M 2001 How to make telemedicine work. Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice 16: 111-114
24. Papageorges M, Hebert P 2001 Choosing your telemedicine system. Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice 16: 107-110.
25. Papageorges M, Hebert P 2001 Other telemedicine applications. Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice 16: 125-126
26. Papageorges M, Hebert P 2001 Telemedicine using standard Internet technologies (telemedicine for less than $1,000). Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice 16: 102-106
27. Papageorges M, Hebert P 2001 Understanding image-capture devices. Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice 16: 95-101.
28. Papageorges M, Hebert P 2001 What's ahead? Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice 16: 130-131.
29. Papageorges M, Hebert P, Hanson J, Girard E, Leveille R, Feleciano, J 2001 Telesonography. Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice 16: 117-121
30. Papageorges M, Tilley L 2001 Why telemedicine? Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice 16: 90-94
31. Pollock R V 2001 Advances in information technology. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 17: 263-274. 32
32. Reyers F 2004 Telepathology, telemedicine and teleconsulting. VetNews July: 9-10
33. Robertson T A 1999 Telemedicine - creating the virtual veterinary hospital. Compendium on Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian 21: 128-133
34. Rosen M P, Levine D, Carpenter J M, Frost L, Hulka C A, Western D L, McArdle C R 1999 Diagnostic accuracy with US: remote radiologists' versus on-site radiologists' interpretations. Radiology 210: 733-736
35. Taleb A C, Bohm G M, Avila M, Wen C L 2005 The efficiency of telemedicine for ophthalmology triage by a general practitioner. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 11: 83-85
36. Yagi Y, Gilbertson J R 2005 Digital imaging in pathology: the case for standardization. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 11: 109-116